I think that it is nice that we do see from time to time some players choosing to take a little less contract wise to stay put so to speak. I like seeing it but I still stop short of putting the proverbial halo around their heads. They all are being given "big money". If you sign a contract that guarantees you anything north of 10 million dollars and you don't think that this is enough to sustain you and yours for generations to come, there really is something wrong with you. Of course we as well as they want as much as we can get, but at what point is enough actually enough? I surely don't know how it all plays out but it sure looks to me that the people in the best positions to profit during these times are the owners. Current restrictive spending rules as well as a greater use of statistical data discouraging the signing of players over the age of 30 to anything resembling long term, seems to me to play right into the hands of the people who sign the big checks.