Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

cp176

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,751

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by cp176

  1. cp176
    I'm pretty sure that Pomeranz is gone but I don't discount his 17 wins for us last year. It will be a long time before anything other than personal sentiment dictates whether this trade was right or wrong. Hindsight I guess. I will eat the boiled crow when and if Espinoza gets to his 20th major league win. JBJ sure isn't much of a problem for us. Never was really. I don't even remember who it was hollering about trading him. It still might happen I guess but if it does I bet it will be for an all around upgrade.
  2. cp176
    I would be stunned if Devers was not on the playoff roster. I like Phillips and Kinsler as well. they both can catch the ball and throw the ball but still not keeping Devers on the playoff roster? Nope - I don't see that one at all. Maybe I guess but I don't see it.
  3. cp176
    Hey I'm not particularly upset by any of this. Certainly not with you. I hope JBJ finishes his career in Boston. Guess I'm just having a bad advanced stat kind of day. I love the fact that our team does not feel restricted by what the stat pushers say is inevitable - age,past performance, age ...
  4. cp176
    You see this is exactly why I think that a constant barrage empowering stat geeks ( whoever the f*** they might be ) is not only overblown but foolish at best. The Red Sox likely will never have to worry about being in a situation like this so even discussing a topic like this is a major league fool's errand. I get the fact that you are a JBJ super fan. Many of us are just not to the same extent. All of a sudden out of virtually nowhere we are now discussing the likelihood of keeping JBJ over a top of the line MVP candidate - ludicrous. If people want to use all of the advanced stats in the universe to in some weird way justify never signing anyone with this person's unbelievable talent, so be it. Oh my goodness - He is over 30 - average at best in the field - makes too much money - etc. etc. etc. I'm really happy that our ownership and GM do not adhere to some of the most totally f***ed up theories that I have heard in my lifetime. I'm also really glad that I am a simple average fan and a member of a vast majority who really could care less about the minutia represented by the advanced stat deluge.
  5. cp176
    Oh good one Slash! Nice one.
  6. cp176
    I guess that it is a good thing Moon that the reality of his situation really calls for no hypotheticals. He has made no demands other than being up front about his desire to play some in the outfield. I don't think that is going to change. I guess I could pose a question that is about as likely to happen as yours - If you could only keep one of the two JBJ or JD, which would it be? That is a no brainer for me.
  7. cp176
    There really wasn't any doubt about it in my mind. I agree with you about the staying healthy part. He has been one of the very best hitters in the game for a while now when healthy. No one should have been in actual doubt as to what he would likely do. It is of course great to see the numbers that he has put up. Although I would have been satisfied with less, I'm not surprised by them at all.
  8. cp176
    I agree with you that these types of contracts make no sense . (to us) The owners with pockets this deep I don't think particularly care what the statistics say when the opportunity to sign a top of the rotation arm presents itself. Once again, this is a discussion that we have had. I don't see John Henry buying into the philosophy of not signing an ace because of fear that it might cost money on the back end of a contract. With respect to a top of the line closer, oh well, if he decides to pay the man I guess we will just have to accept it. I'm not going to question how he chooses to spend his money.
  9. cp176
    I view momentum much like I do confidence. Is there a way to measure how confidence in what you do might make you better at your job? Confidence can be shaken by lots of things for instance a hostile crowd. Just had a talk with an outstanding former college athlete - 4 year football guy at a pretty good school. Momentum which leads to increased confidence is for real. I'm going to side with what almost every athlete and coach I have talked to about things like this believe in. Oh and they aren't people who believe the world is flat either. lol
  10. cp176
    Right again - Coaches and players would certainly agree. People who have practical experience in athletics at any level probably would agree with you. Because it can't be measured does not mean that it can't happen.
  11. cp176
    I'll say it again - that post should not have been made here at all.
  12. cp176
    I'm thinking that I agree with you. Momentum is a curious thing. I believe in making sure that your players are rested too but too much time off can sometimes be just as harmful as too little time off. Oh - also once again I'll say that the playoff season has become much too long for me. I'm easily bored I guess lol
  13. cp176
    All very true but naysaying and worrying really are big parts of who many of us are. I am fairly sure that this team is and will be just fine but I do worry about losing momentum as we move forward. Understand that I get the fact that there is little to no significance placed on positive momentum by many here because it can't be measured. Works for me though - i don't believe that it is soley about talent particularly at the highest level.
  14. cp176
    I'm not sure how you guys seem to get away with the political innuendo.
  15. cp176
    To not totally embrace the world of advanced metrics, does not necessarily mean that someone does not see their value either. It just isn't something that I am particularly interested in. For the most part, I am very content with what I see through observation coupled with some basic statistical evidence to formulate my own opinions. I like to share and discuss what I believe to be true. Many of the things that I absolutely believe in I truly believe cannot be statistically proven or disproven. I don't think that this makes me anti- Copernican not an anti Darwinist. I honestly feel that often times people become so adamant in their beliefs on both sides of the aisle that they choose to not believe in anything other than what they "know" to be true. It is entertainment - that is it.
  16. cp176
    Your comments and observations really do make an impression. It is interesting too because I am relying on my memory with respect to that catch. I like what I remember about it so much that I don't want to see it on video - if that makes any sense. Statistics at the highest level available are intrinsic to this game. That being said what I love about the game is what I remember about it. Sometimes I really don't want my mind changed by any type of replay. Was Evan's classic catch in right really that great? Do we see Mays's catch duplicated every year? We might but at the time these were incredible plays. You see baseball is very much about memories to me. I'm certainly no Yankees fan, but I would take the play of Bobby Richardson at second base even up with anyone's I have seen and for the record if the statistics could prove my belief wrong, I might not care. I love the memories. It is simply entertainment for me.
  17. cp176
    Oh - and thank you for responding. Obviously SK that was meant for you and not me.
  18. cp176
    I saw that catch by Jackson last year, I'm thinking that I might agree with you. Although I really did like Yaz's catch in '67 when Rohr was pitching for the no-no quite a bit. I'm pretty sure that you do understand where I am coming from here. I'm really not as interested in the advanced metrics that some hang their hats on. I love trying to defend my observations and feelings based upon what I have seen and what I see as opposed to quoting something so finite. I'm probably wrong but folklore is written by people like me. That is what baseball is to me. It is an incredible game. Take the human element and perspective out of it and not so much. I still like umpires. I didn't at one time but now I do. lol
  19. cp176
    So when Baseball America lists JBJ as the best defensive center fielder playing today, I should ignore this because they did not list the incredible number of statistical sources they used to come up with this rating? Just checking ...
  20. cp176
    I loved that story. It's easy to forget that these guys are human beings with families. They don't exist just for us to go on about. the story about Cora and his twins should help to put into perspective what is really important.
  21. cp176
    Wait wait Slasher - I'll go with you. We represent two posters who have some opposing thoughts and ideas who can still actually get along with each other most of the time. lol
  22. cp176
    I get the fact that everybody loves the long ball - well not everybody. Do people love the number of strikeouts just as much? Also, what did I just read - the average time now between batted balls in play is what 4 minutes - just a little too long for most. Many more pitchers just throwing as opposed to pitching. I think that it is things like these that are not making the game a better game. My question would be what's happening and what's causing it too happen? Not to mention once again an over emphasis on shifts. An over emphasis on analytics has led to these changes. If the "average" fan wants to watch a game like what we are seeing develop today - so be it. Also, yes I mentioned the word bunting an it obviously become a focal point of my statement. It shouldn't be. Whatever people think about the art of bunting it is and has been an integral part of the game along with all of the so called "small" ball concepts. I think that all of us want to see the best brand of baseball played that we can see, I don't really think that that is what we are seeing.
  23. cp176
    2. wasn't really just about the bunting but I do get the point. I think that I might be what I consider the average fan. Maybe the average fan of yesteryear. I post primarily from the heart. I understand that. I really don't care much about the advanced metrics. I also think that big money is the culprit of the game to some extent as well. I'm not saying that change is bad. In most cases it is good.
  24. cp176
    I don't like the following: 1. instant replay - which isn't instant 2. the potential concept of relying on robots to ultimately replace umpires 3. a homerun or a strikeout with a de-emplahsis on many of the things that some baseball fans still love such as bunting, hitting and running, and stealing bases. 4. pitdhers not pitching to conatact As the game changes, i don't think that it is the old folks that you have to worry about losing. Numbers have always been important to the game and will continue to be. If the numbers dictate change, I hope that they are the types of changes that the average fan wants to see. I don't think that the game is as entertaining as it once was and I don't think that I am alone in feeling that way.
  25. cp176
    Please don't misunderstand what I am saying. Talking about the numbers and making projections based upon them I doubt is turning anyone away from the game. It is when believing absolutely that the numbers tell all and the result lead to what some might consider to be negative change to the game that I think might affect interest. Attendance is down that we know.
×
×
  • Create New...