Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,668

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    Cora issues or Bloom issues? Cora uses what Bloom gives him.
  2. Bellhorn04
    May it be so.
  3. Bellhorn04
    I trust Cora to do the right things. I don't trust anybody on Talksox to do so. :D
  4. Bellhorn04
    What about Brady? You don't think some guys have that ability to rise to an occasion, to flourish under pressure?
  5. Bellhorn04
    That's better than falling behind and not coming back, mind you.
  6. Bellhorn04
    I think with Houck it's lack of options. Whitlock they've really wanted to be a starter, but he keeps getting hurt.
  7. Bellhorn04
    And moon is one.
  8. Bellhorn04
    Does anybody really believe Brady was better in the clutch than Rodgers strictly because of luck?
  9. Bellhorn04
    Proof of clutch = Tom Brady vs. Aaron Rodgers.
  10. Bellhorn04
    I have no doubt. He looks like a champ.
  11. Bellhorn04
    Of course. It's just not as simple as some people would like to have it. Maybe some guys are a little more clutch than others. It's a mystery because it's about how the human mind works under stress and things like that. None of us have definitive answers.
  12. Bellhorn04
    Of course they don't.
  13. Bellhorn04
    The random sample thing does not disprove clutch's existence. It indicates that a sample like Schilling's MIGHT BE a result of randomness. But that's a whole different thing. It's generally impossible to prove a negative.
  14. Bellhorn04
    It's just a nutty game, man. So much stuff happens that no one could have possibly predicted.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Pitchers do have the advantage, ya know. That's why I think an example of a pitcher is better. But you've made it clear enough where you stand LOL
  16. Bellhorn04
    But that's what I'm saying: there's no difference between a crucial hit and a clutch hit, so there's no need for the word clutch. Schilling's record was virtually unblemished. Beckett's became blemished but was still pretty damn good. I don't see why it wouldn't be about the preponderance of data, just as it is with everything else.
  17. Bellhorn04
    It is one crazy game.
  18. Bellhorn04
    Betts = no Wong. You thought you had it covered by removing Dugo.
  19. Bellhorn04
    Cora is very selective about that, too. Last night Wong stayed in the game after Houck was done, faced 2 RH relievers, one with the Sox behind a run, one with the game tied, and of course he improbably homered both times.
  20. Bellhorn04
    Stanton is also an unqualified idiot, who inflicts injuries on himself.
  21. Bellhorn04
    Our W-L record is surely making Bloom look better these days...
  22. Bellhorn04
    It looks to me like McGuire will be catching Kluber and Pivetta, and the platoon is done with.
  23. Bellhorn04
    I think it's safe to say the Yankees have more money on the IL right now than any team in history-by a lot in fact.
  24. Bellhorn04
    Schilling is the best argument for clutch IMHO.
  25. Bellhorn04
    That's just a hit in a crucial situation. The word "clutch" adds nothing. (Just trying to start a pointless semantic debate here.)
×
×
  • Create New...