Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Why did the Black Sox take so much heat for throwing the World Series, BTW? All they had to do was explain that it was a "subset of losing"...
  2. Yeah, you two make a cute little tag team.
  3. OK, they're all subsets of sucking. I guess the next question is, so what? If you don't think intentionally losing is a big difference from unintentionally losing, so be it. I disagree, obviously.
  4. But the Angels have just been making bad decisions for a number of years now. There are always going to be losers in this zero sum game. And the Red Sox have been in that class themselves far too much over the last dozen years...
  5. The only season I can think of that the Red Sox have ever tanked was 2020. And it seemed like the perfect time to do it, with a 60-game season and Sale and E-Rod and Cora out and rest of the post-2019 shitstorm... But I'll always have kind of a queasy feeling about that season and getting Mayer with the #4 pick. We've had other losing seasons of late, but this was the only one that felt like they were fine about it.
  6. It's not so much offensive as misleading. To me it seems like an attempt to gloss over the huge difference-maker known as "intent"...
  7. I hate tanking, I'd rather have an expensive flop, and I think a lot of other fans feel the same way.
  8. "This is just a subset of that" would be downright offensive in many instances. "Being tortured and murdered is just a subset of dying." "Terminal cancer is just a subset of being sick." Nobody says these things.
  9. Well, for starters I don't think much of the list of reasons. You somehow left out boxers throwing fights because they're paid or otherwise coerced to do so. And how is being overmatched throwing a fight?
  10. You really seem to hate the idea that there's a big difference between trying to compete but sucking, and trying to suck. Is throwing a fight in boxing different from trying to win but getting beat? Is throwing a fight a "subset of losing"?
  11. The idea of that kind of tanking is that you do get better, ya know.
  12. Because he's a slippery one. As are you, on this issue. Brothers in arms, huh?
  13. No, it isn't exactly what you said. Your whole point seems to be there isn't much difference between trying and sucking, and tanking. You've even suggested fans don't care either way.
  14. Thank you. It's not that complicated.
  15. Yes, shockingly enough, I do think a lot of fans care whether their team is trying to compete or not.
  16. Not saying always, of course. Saying it was for the Cubs and the Astros.
  17. What does that even mean, subset of sucking? Tanking is deliberately sucking. It's massively different from trying and sucking.
  18. They struck gold twice. No, that does not support your point.
  19. Of course. It was a gradual process.
  20. No, it isn't. Tanking is a deliberate strategy.
  21. Agreed, those 2 are perfect examples. But mvp seems to be denying that the Astros tanked.
  22. So you're going to keep omitting #2 pick Bregman? "Not spending" can certainly be an integral part of tanking...
  23. Theo's Cubs did the same. It was blatant in both cases and it worked.
  24. Yeah, there's not much difference between not trying to win and trying not to win.
×
×
  • Create New...