Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,801

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    I can see Napoli getting 2 clean years. 3 clean years would be pretty stupid on somebody's part.
  2. Bellhorn04
    That's true but Dempster's 4.57 was the one that was pretty close to what a lot of people expected.
  3. Bellhorn04
    I think they should make a serious effort to trade either Dempster or Peavy. It it's Dempster and they don't have to pay more a third of his salary, or if it's Peavy and they don't have to pay more than a couple million. Something like that. Then instead of $32 million they've got $40 million plus to spend. I have a strong feeling Dempster or Peavy will be moved.
  4. Bellhorn04
    OK, if you mean Peavy would be #4 on the Sox I agree.
  5. Bellhorn04
    Peavy had #3 stats last year.
  6. Bellhorn04
    Jeez Dojji, you're killing me with this dump Nava stuff. You were his biggest booster and he had a great season and you want to dump him. WTF? His OPS of .831 was 3rd highest for Sox regulars after Ortiz and Napoli.
  7. Bellhorn04
    I'd like to know where the 75-80 million posting fee estimate comes from. That just seems wrong. It'd be 50% more than the fee for Darvish, and by all accounts Tanaka is not as good as Darvish.
  8. Bellhorn04
    As much as I liked Drew this year, 36/3 is too much.
  9. Bellhorn04
    While Dempster ('the money') was on mopup duty.
  10. Bellhorn04
    Agreed.
  11. Bellhorn04
    75-80 million would be insane. Fee for Darvish, like Dice-K, was a little over 51 million.
  12. Bellhorn04
    There's a new penalty for going over the threshold. If a big market team like the Red Sox stays under the threshold they have to pay less in revenue sharing than they do if they go over. No idea how it's calculated but it's a significant chunk of money.
  13. Bellhorn04
    Yes, that was a huge problem this past season. They spent all that money on mid-range guys. And where did it get them?
  14. Bellhorn04
    They did fall short with the same guys last year.
  15. Bellhorn04
    You might need him in a park with a short right field fence to pull that off.
  16. Bellhorn04
    Nobody should sleep on Workman, and (sorry about this) Buchholz should sleep on nobody.
  17. Bellhorn04
    I know one thing - one of the world's thinnest books would be: 'Buy-low starters who have been big successes for the Red Sox.'
  18. Bellhorn04
    Now I'd like to see a list of the buy-low guys from the last few years that have actually paid off.
  19. Bellhorn04
    Yes. The Red Sox have Bodacious Ben.
  20. Bellhorn04
    I'm looking forward to watching him for years. Although his numbers weren't great this year he was one of the guys I always wanted to watch when he was at the plate.
  21. Bellhorn04
    What would you like to see them do about catcher next year?
  22. Bellhorn04
    And the manager was certainly a lot more balanced than the last one.
  23. Bellhorn04
    Not vastly underestimating, I don't think. Compare to Russell Martin's 2 years/$17 million. Martin is better defensively and not hugely worse offensively. Especially when Salty's OPS this year partially resulted from a high BABip.
  24. Bellhorn04
    I don't think the revenue sharing rebate is quite that much but I could be wrong. However much it is, keep in mind that the rebate is an annual thing so it will always be there as a disincentive to going over the $189 million.
  25. Bellhorn04
    I think they did last year, especially letting Swisher and Martin go and not replacing them with much. That was not the Yankee Way. They might get fed up with the thrifty s*** in a big hurry though.
×
×
  • Create New...