Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Um, couldn't you say the same thing about the Red Sox? Think about it?
  2. And generally the only way writers can figure that is by going with the guys whose teams had the biggest improvement in wins. When Tito was with the Red Sox I think the highest he finished in the voting was 3rd or 4th. But he had a big handicap because he inherited a 95-win team - tough to improve on. With Cleveland he inherits a 68-win team and bingo, wins the award. Silly IMO.
  3. Well, Cleveland did it with about half the payroll we did, so Francona is probably getting credit for that. Personally I don't care about any of the awards, but MOTY I especially don't care about.
  4. Yeah, that's pretty confusing jung. Drew's strength is his SLG, not his BA.
  5. More like 60% about pitching. The KC Royals had the best ERA and ERA+ in the league. And they're not the first team to lead the league in pitching and miss the playoffs.
  6. That seems a bit premature. Is his latest injury that impossible to recover from?
  7. He did play in 134 games this year.
  8. Latest payroll projections from Alex Speier: Guaranteed deals David Ortiz 17.00 John Lackey 16.50 Jake Peavy 16.50 Dustin Pedroia 13.30 Ryan Dempster 13.25 Shane Victorino 13.00 Jon Lester 9.37 Clay Buchholz 7.75 Jonny Gomes 5.00 Koji Uehara 4.25 Craig Breslow 3.13 David Ross 3.10 TOTAL GUARANTEED 122.15 Arbitration eligible Junichi Tazawa 2.00 Estimated Andrew Miller 1.75 Estimated Franklin Morales 1.75 Estimated Mike Carp 1.20 Estimated Team control Felix Doubront 0.58 Estimated Daniel Nava 0.57 Estimated Will Middlebrooks 0.55 Estimated Brandon Workman 0.50 Estimated Xander Bogaerts 0.50 Estimated Summary Guaranteed deals 122.15 Arbitration eligible 7.00 Estimated Team control 2.70 Estimated Depth callups 4.00 Estimated Trades 5.00 Estimated 40-man roster 1.20 Estimated Dodger subsidy 3.90 Medical benefits etc.10.80 Estimated Total 156.75 Notes: Bailey not included, projected as non-tender.
  9. I don't see how we can add cost in starting pitching without also subtracting cost in starting pitching.
  10. Yeah, I don't think they should eat more than that either.
  11. OK forget about Peavy...what about Dempster.
  12. But they would certainly have to move Dempster or Peavy to have room for Hudson or Haren.
  13. They may be a little strapped in the sense of staying under the $189 million. It all depends, of course, what they do about catcher/first base/shortstop.
  14. Sign me up.
  15. My preference would be Dempster. But if they can't move him maybe trade Peavy. Reasoning: Both are signed for only one year. Frees up $10 million or so for other needs. 2014 rotation still has Lester/Lackey/Buchholz/Doubront/Peavy or Dempster + prospects.
  16. I can see Napoli getting 2 clean years. 3 clean years would be pretty stupid on somebody's part.
  17. That's true but Dempster's 4.57 was the one that was pretty close to what a lot of people expected.
  18. I think they should make a serious effort to trade either Dempster or Peavy. It it's Dempster and they don't have to pay more a third of his salary, or if it's Peavy and they don't have to pay more than a couple million. Something like that. Then instead of $32 million they've got $40 million plus to spend. I have a strong feeling Dempster or Peavy will be moved.
  19. OK, if you mean Peavy would be #4 on the Sox I agree.
  20. Peavy had #3 stats last year.
  21. Jeez Dojji, you're killing me with this dump Nava stuff. You were his biggest booster and he had a great season and you want to dump him. WTF? His OPS of .831 was 3rd highest for Sox regulars after Ortiz and Napoli.
  22. I'd like to know where the 75-80 million posting fee estimate comes from. That just seems wrong. It'd be 50% more than the fee for Darvish, and by all accounts Tanaka is not as good as Darvish.
  23. As much as I liked Drew this year, 36/3 is too much.
×
×
  • Create New...