I don't think the team should start trading guys just because we're having a disappointing, frustrating season.
I can see trading Porcello because his contract is expiring, that's about the only 'name' move I can see.
No offense, but of what possible use is this information? We all know it's highly unlikely at this juncture. Numbers like 11% and 8.2% could hardly be more meaningless.
11% suggests that if we get to play the next half-season 9 times, one of those times we'll win it!
I don't think very many fans worry about saving money for the owners. They worry about the front office not spending wisely because they know that hurts the quality of the team on the field.
Wrong.
They went over by about 2.5 million.
Their final tax bill was about 11.95 million.
First 20 million over @ 20% = 4 million
Next 20 million over @ 32% = 6.4 million
Last 2.5 million over @ 62.5% = 1.55 million
There is a pile of randomness in baseball.
It's time for me to recite what Mike Mussina said again. Mussina said that out of 32 starts, he would have 8 where everything was working, 8 where nothing was working, and 16 where something was working.
That may be a fair point. Of course what starters are asked to do, go 6-7 quality innings, is much different from what relievers are asked to do, so it's a bit of apples-oranges.