Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. As I said, Speier pointed out that there are other penalties in withheld revenue-sharing money. All money.
  2. Those penalties are negligible. Your Budgie license is hereby revoked.
  3. Huh? If the luxury tax payments are the smallest part of it, what's the big deal about re-setting?
  4. I think a lot of it has to do with the lux tax structure and the fact that Year 3 is deadly. Alex Speier also pointed out that there are other penalties in withheld revenue-sharing money for teams who go over the threshold 3 years in a row.
  5. I'm referring more to the entertainment here on the forum.
  6. One thing that gets overlooked a bit about trading Mookie is that it will actually save the team $40 million or so, including the tax, assuming that if we kept Mookie we'd be over the limit by about $20-25 million.
  7. I want the Clay man too. Though I admit a lot of it is for entertainment purposes.
  8. One of your better humor efforts.
  9. Al Hartz drives the truck and has for a long time. Just found that out this morning.
  10. Yep. He'll be back in NE.
  11. LOL. And I promise I will never again disparage the team doctors.
  12. Hey Lawrence, remember when you said this?
  13. You are too much, Lawrence.
  14. That's the $400 million question.
  15. I'll say this, if it comes to Mookie being a free agent and we're in on it, as a fan I'll certainly be hoping we have the highest bid.
  16. But you probably won't like the $35 million AAV for those last 6 years so much, when those years inevitably arrive.
  17. Peter Gammons @pgammo Three different NL folks today predicted Betts-to-L.A. is "inevitable." Consensus deal:Alex Verdugo, Inf Jeter Downs, pitcher, maybe A prospect. Think P is LH Caleb Ferguson, 95 MPH FB/CB guy, 113-39 K-BB in 93.1 IP, eventual starter.
  18. That's a whole other debate.
  19. So what you're really saying is that the people who run the teams are stupid, and that an opt-out might save the team from its own stupidity through sheer luck.
  20. It's the old prizefighter syndrome. They don't quit till it's too late. Why? Because combat is their life.
  21. And in the case that the player could get more money on the open market, you'd be better off having him because you'd be able to trade him. Thus it's a fallacy that the player opting out benefits you.
  22. Well, I agree with 700hitter (I think) - all things equal, opt outs are not a plus for the team.
  23. 700hitter's point comes into effect if the guy has a strong year before the opt-out decision. Then you would be hoping for him to opt in, because in theory he'd be tradeable for at least as much as what was left on his contract.
  24. I didn't say that. mvp said we were similar to 2018.
  25. They're trying to trade Price too, of course.
×
×
  • Create New...