Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. 1. Sure 2. Not a chance. Verdugo brought enough baggage of his own.
  2. Hey, we all like trade proposals where we fleece the other team.
  3. The idea of them trading Devers on top of trading Mookie is unspeakably absurd.
  4. These aren't penalties we're talking about. They're adjustments.
  5. Why's that?
  6. But Kimmi, is there loyalty on the other side, from the front office? Let's not forget that they traded Mookie - and Price. For business (payroll) reasons. They also said goodbye to Porcello, Holt et cetera. There's no loyalty going either way.
  7. It's pretty simple and makes perfect sense, actually. We were benefitting from an AAV that was lower than JD's actual salary in 2018 and 2019. If he opts out we get stuck with an adjustment in the year he opts out. The only 'penalty' is in the luxury tax calculations, which of course are totally separate from the actual payroll.
  8. So Cot's has us at 16.4 million below the cap. However, there is one little issue - the JDM opt-out. I'm 99.99% sure that if JD opts out at the end of this year, we will get hit with an adjustment of 5.25 million, representing the difference between what he was actually paid by us over 3 years -23.75 * 3 = 71.25, and the original AAV of 22 * 3 = 66.
  9. Just trying to torment you a bit, Jax. You'd do the same for us.
  10. Those are fair comments. But the whole premise of being part of a 'team' or above the 'team' is shaky. We're talking about a hard cold business where players are constantly being traded, cut, left dangling in free agency et cetera. They're treated like commodities. As are general managers and managers who are being fired and replaced all the time. I'm not trying to sing the blues for the players here, I'm just talking about the realities of the 'team' concept.
  11. I know, that was awful.
  12. What does that mean, really? On the field he has always given it 100%. And apparently he also has strong leadership qualities, according to comments Alex Speier recently made on Twitter-Speier learned this when researching his book on the 2018 team. I do understand how you feel about Mookie's drive for the money, but I think as far as on the field goes, he is an exemplary team player.
  13. And Cole's numbers improved dramatically when he went from Pitt to Houston. Another interesting subplot to follow this season.
  14. I was a little surprised that Theo gave up on him so quickly and ate all that money, but I assumed he had his reasons.
  15. But in the '04 postseason he was rock solid and error-free for 14 games, and hit a little too.
  16. The hitting played into it too. I think it all started with the contract. 4 years for 40 million was a fair chunk in those days. Expectations were probably set a little high. I wasn't one of the people calling him Rent-a-Wreck. Just trying to explain it.
  17. Another thing with Renteria was that Cabrera played so well for us in '04 and people were puzzled that Theo didn't just re-sign him. Later came the stories about OCab's off-field antics.
  18. Probably because Nomar more than compensated with the stick...before 2004, that is.
  19. I think what killed Renteria with Sox fans was the errors.
  20. Great movie, great book.
  21. Trout is hardly the first star player whose marketability has been hurt by playing on crappy teams though?
  22. But on the flip side there's Clemens, and his 'remarkable career renaissance' after going to the Jays...
  23. Maris. The exploits of McGwire and Sosa, and then Bonds, became a bad joke in retrospect, when we knew they were juiced.
×
×
  • Create New...