Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
  2. User Name
    Both Hal and Hank already came out and emphatically denied these reports.....which means there may be something to them.
  3. User Name
    "What it looks like" right now matters little. It's an 8-start sample, and he's been serviceable at the back-end of the rotation. How does that look like failure?
  4. User Name
  5. User Name
    Isn't that the whole point of a 4th/5th OF? It's a guy who's not good enough to be a regular (In Jones' case, he can't hit righties anymore) but who has enough tools to play in specific situations (lefties in Jones' case.
  6. User Name
    8 starts. You can be certain most of Bard's problems are mental and mechanical. The stuff is there. 47 IP as a starter is indicative of nothing.
  7. User Name
  8. User Name
    That's what the YES boards are for.
  9. User Name
  10. User Name
    Yes, but Hughes has had a lot more time to prove himself. I bet you've been a big Hughes supporter regardless of his early struggles, hence your current point. Bard's speed could still rebound. And the slider should come back. Apples and oranges. He's had a couple starts after being stretched out for the first time in years. Not nearly enough time to call the experiment a "failure". Wait and see.
  11. User Name
    "Or below" "afterthought" what? He's a fifth OF. My point is that you're making such a huge effort to put the guy down, when there's really not a lot to put down. He is what he is.
  12. User Name
    Hughes has been on the league as a starter for years, Bard has less than 10 starts. Apples and oranges. Also, apparently you do need it since you're justifying yourself, but whatever. Post away. No wonder you got a chart describing your posts.
  13. User Name
    What is it with you and Nava? He's not that good bro. Get over it.
  14. User Name
    DFTT.
  15. User Name
  16. User Name
    Why the big buzz over a 5th OF? He does one thing well, which is getting on base, and has improved his D. An adequate replacement. Btw Jacko, your schtick is getting really really annoying, no offense.
  17. User Name
  18. User Name
    It's just flabbergasting how some people can think that: A) Less than 10 starts is enough to judge whether or not the Bard "experiment" will or won't pay dividends. B ) The idea that just because the guy hasn't flashed "exceptional stuff" he will never be a decent starter, even though we know he has great stuff. Are you serious?
  19. User Name
    The f*** does Limbaugh have to do with the shittiness of last night's OF and getting owned by a guy that's sucked ass all year? Focus on baseball plz.
  20. User Name
    So you openly admit to trolling? You're my internet hero.
  21. User Name
  22. User Name
    Hey, i know the reality of the pitching woes of this team. I just don't pretend to know more about the business of baseball than those who manage teams for a living. The reason i'm not bitching and moaning is because there's actually a lot of room for internal improvement on this team. The bullpen has been lights-out for more than a month (our supposed weak link) while the team's two best pitchers still haven't hit their stride. And after all, the division, held by the sure-to-regress Orioles, is still up for grabs. Being a "realist" is looking at things from a "realistic" angle, not whining incessantly.
  23. User Name
  24. User Name
    I was on vacation outside of the country. When i got back, i had a lot of catching up to do at work, and had just started stronglift 5x5, so not a lot of leisure time other than watching the Sox and NBA playoffs.
  25. User Name
    I highly doubt the Tigers would sell low on Scherzer. As evidenced by Sunday's outing, when he's on, he's Verlander on.
×
×
  • Create New...