Actually, that doesn't really change much. Betts is still unproven to a large degree at the ML level. The main issue here is control time, and that's a valid argument, but the Strasburg tier of pitcher for two years offers a hell of a lot more certainty than a guy who has less than 200 AB's at the ML level.
Let me say though, that this doesn't contradict my idea that Betts is the best OF on the Sox roster right now. My point of contention is your usual overvaluing and rose-colored glasses view of Sox prospects. Betts may (and probably will) struggle, and then, most of the guys who wrote these articles will be second guessing themselves like they did with Bogaerts, who you similarly hyped last year using similar sources of support.
"Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it".
For the record, i'm not saying Betts won't eventually reach all-star levels of performance, i'm just saying he may not do it in 2015, or even 2016. You can't always just look at grading curves and aggregate values.
But hey, wave them pom-poms man.
Note: The pom-poms comment was made in jest