For the record, the way I'm doing the scoring is to assign point values to each rankings, and then tally up the points in the end. The difference is that I'm doing it DIRECTLY proportional to the rankings (ie 1st = 1 point, 2nd = 2 points....13th = 13 points, 14th = 14 points) rather than INVERSELY proportional (ie 1st = 14 points, 2nd = 13 points....13th = 2 points, 14th = 1 point) because doing it directly will punish those that don't vote.
For example, by doing it directly proportional to the rankings, the person with the lowest amount of points wins. When people vote, since they aren't voting for themselves, they are still helping themselves because they give themselves 0 points (since they can't vote for themselves) and the team that they put in 1st still gets 1 point, so by voting, the people help themselves out. Therefore, by scoring the votes directly proportional to the rankings, it gives people an incentive to vote, since they get punished if they don't vote.
Whereby if I scored it inversely proportional to the rankings, people would have an incentive to NOT vote, since the people with the highest amount of points would win, and people would gain 0 points from voting since they can't vote for themselves, and they'd be giving the last place person at least 1 point.
Therefore the people who haven't voted yet are hurting themselves, and that should hopefully get the remaining votes in. I'll post the results either as soon as the 15th power rankings come in, or sometime tomorrow morning.