Which bullpen? The Red Sox? The Brewers? The Dodgers? All across the playoffs, many elite starters were pulled early in these playoffs and the bullpen did just fine. It's just that the '26 Red Sox bullpen with an injured Guerrero and a beleaguered Miller could not. If it was the July/August bullpen, the Sox may have had a better chance with that strategy.
When Masa was signed, most evaluators were very bearish on him and did not like the contract he was given. I haven't heard many people being down on Sato in a similar manner.
I don't feel super comfortable about Crochet's long term health either. I've already said the variance about him for next season is somewhere between season ending surgery in ST and CY.
I wouldn't mind if they spent towards the pen TBH. Slaten is permanently on the IL. I don't think Guerrero can be counted on for sure. Chapman is out of here soon. There isn't much MiLB reliever depth.
Almost everyone on here is. All I've been saying is that offense is missing two bats at the top of the lineup. Moon is asking for more bats. I think most of us are saying the same things TBH.
If you are using your 6th starter in a playoff game, you may not be reaching the WS anyway.
All the Sox WS winners had solid rotation health or supplemented at the deadline (Peavy, Eovaldi) and weren't relying on 6th-7th starters in the playoffs.
It's clear that people really have no idea what other rosters look like. Oh, the Brewers and Rays couldn't win if they had Bello at 5. They might not like his salary, but they'd take Bello the pitcher at 5.
It affects how good the depth the Sox is, because you are comparing it to other orgs. You can't just say "well, the depth stinks because I think it does."