Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    86,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    262

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. That's why the Rays moved on from Renfroe. He was going to get paid more than he'd reasonably earn in FA.
  2. Is 12 at bats over the course of 11 games a good sample?
  3. I guess it still depends on the pitcher. Jalen Beeks works almost exclusively with an opener and in 2019, he only pitched 4 games with 5+ innnings pitched. If he was a true starter, he could have only been credited for 4 wins at most. However, he earned 6 wins that year due to how they factor in relief wins. In fact, Beeks had zero wins in games in which he actually started the opening frame. Over time, the better pitchers are more likely to get wins regardless of when they start the game as long as their overall innings pitched isn't dramatically impacted.
  4. Unfortunately, Tomase's article has NO new details. For someone with access to management, you think he'd be able to get some quotes about where this stands.
  5. And I might run into Christina Hendricks on the way home.
  6. Extremely unlikely as he's only had one season above 900 OPS.
  7. A hard line drive off the monster is just as visually pleasing to me.
  8. He's had off an on again wrist issues. It's possible he doesn't opt out.
  9. 1. Ben was too stingy with the trades. 2. Bloom hasn't been here long enough or had the right timing to trade from his farm system.
  10. But.... not only did they win, THEY WON A TEAM RECORD 108 GAMES.
  11. I like the razzle dazzle.
  12. https://twitter.com/redsoxstats/status/1459229486256476164 Whatever it takes.
  13. If they both would sign 28x6, it'd be a good enough deal.
  14. I guess A in theory, but it's too high AAV and too many years. He won't get that.
  15. No, I've said I want Devers and Xander through 2027, not 2030.
  16. I don't like either option.
  17. Hmm, I thought they offered 300M to him?
  18. Tampa's payroll plus Sale, plus Bogey, plus Devers is still under the lux tax.
  19. The recency effect wants me to see Stanton hit at Fenway for 81 games a year.
  20. Somedays, I wish I was an electrician or plumber instead, but then I wouldn't have this winning personality.
  21. With Betts, it had nothing to do with salary cap space since there was no way they would re-sign him. For Bogey, you're just saying that it's better to allocate his salary dollars to other players. That's a fine option if that's what you want. I specifically want Bogaerts and Devers here through 2027.
  22. Because it's only for one year. It's like trading one year of a 4 fWAR guy for 4 years of a 1 fWAR guy.
  23. Do we know what their price range is?
  24. Are they more likely to extend Xander during 2022 than they were with Correa in 2021?
×
×
  • Create New...