Alright, Example, fair enough. I have a crazy idea however: Let's try and pretend that no one was really disputing that Guzman was better than Green and that the conversation of the afternoon centered around two questions:
1: Is the marginal upgrade of Guzman over Green worth the contract cost
2: Is the marginal upgrade of Guzman over Green worth the opportunity costs associated with going into the offseason still bound to a mediocre SS on top of the money we'd owe Lugo. The specific opportunity in question was the opportunity to acquire Hanley Ramirez in trade, which would be made more problematic by an acquisition of Guzman. Would this team, with Guzman, be better than the team that we would have plus Hanley and minus the king's ransom of prospects he'd cost?