Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

BSN07

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,980
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by BSN07

  1. The guy makes Julian Tavares look sane
  2. They can not trade that clown quick enough imo.
  3. He looks like he's made some strides with the bat. He's not Tulo, but there is some measure of optimism that he could hit above the Mendoza line.
  4. I thought we sorted that out like 2 hours ago?
  5. Remy and Orsillo are a great duo with good chemistry, like you said, probably one of the better tandems in the league of broadcasting. I'm not advocating they split them up. I just hope if Remy decides to retire the consider Ecks because he brings a different energy to the booth that I thought flowed well with Orsillo when he was filling in.
  6. A wise man once said " you don't wrestle with a pig, you both end up muddy, but the pig enjoys it..."
  7. Ya Lavs hasn't done much to push Salty. I fully expect him back in AAA to start the season or if someone offers the right piece I wouldn't be shocked to see him moved.
  8. Blasphemy! The King will surely have your head for this infraction upon the crown!
  9. Just throwing this out there but Angels are looking for a back up catcher. Red Sox are probably a logical partner with their C depth. Ross can't be traded until June 1 without permission. That wouldn't make a lot of sense. Lavs and Salty both could possibly be available. Especially with Vazquez showing he's probably a ML C at least behind the dish. But he's in AA for a reason. They could be interested in Salty as it wouldn't be a long term commitment. I really don't know what the Angels have that could help?
  10. Ecks will have to develop his secondary stuff before being able to produce in the booth for a whole season
  11. I will admit I missed the post on the previous page. And it would have probably helped a bit explaining the next one. I knew it seemed off for some reason. Now I know why.
  12. Ok I'm going to need an explanation then. Is anyone else seeing this? Am I in the twilight zone or something?
  13. I don't see the reason in starting the season with plan B(Bradley) in the OF if there isn't a reason to think plan A(Gomes platoon, Ellsbury and Victorino) isn't going to work.
  14. No I don't fault Boras at all. He is the best at what he does. The man is a genius from an agent stand point. But I don't forget that as soon as one of my teams players joins his agency.
  15. So if he can't hack it, they send him down for two weeks and try again? Do I have that correct?
  16. I don't disagree that he is better then the two. But to make an impact that is so above and beyond what they can provide for two weeks would have to be Trout like. And you have decades of watching baseball, how often does that happen? Yes, I'm window licking special.
  17. I haven't seen anything about them adding a 3rd person. I think this is just something they have been doing to change it up in ST. I really enjoyed when they had the Pittsburgh guys in there. There seemed to be a good flow between the two sides that was not there with Rice last night. I'm hoping Ecks is being groomed to take over for Remy at some point. One of the best things is Ecks has that ability to make Orsillio go off on one of his uncontrollable fits of laughter at any point, which is always good stuff
  18. I'm not saying Nava and Sweeney are world beaters. Just they can hold down the fort for a couple weeks. You know, like most 4th and 5th OF's have to occasionally do time to time in Majors over the course of a season. And the fact you admire nothing about me will not cause me to lose sleep at night. I'm not even sure why you had to add that in there after a reasonable post. Do you have some sort of douche clause that doesn't allow you to do otherwise?
  19. If he's great he's gone. If he sucks he's gone. If he is ok and takes a Bourn type contract then maybe he stays. That about sums it up.
  20. Ya he was boring. I wish the let Ecks do more ST games.
  21. Ciriaco had back spasms
  22. Excited to see Marrero today
  23. Ya I can't think of a recent group that has that defensive upside. I haven't seen much of Vazquez, but everything I'm reading seems to be positive. I wouldn't expect him this year though with the amount of Catchers in front of him.
  24. It just makes no sense to me. They are basically telling me that no one on the current roster ahead of Bradley can provide league average production for two weeks in April. I find that very hard to believe. Another thing I can't understand is why they would want to give up a whole guaranteed season for those two weeks. Scott Boras is his agent. No one in their right mind should ever bank on being able to sort out an extension with any kind of Boras Agent. Especially when the player is as talented as almost everyone thinks he will be. Is it possible? Yes. But it would be the exception to the rule. And to me, to avoid all of that, I can wait two weeks. Now if it goes past the deadline and we get into May and there is an obvious role for him and he doesn't get called up, I will be right there with the rest wondering "why isn't he up yet?"
×
×
  • Create New...