Bell, you are a great poster, and I think that you are about my age, so I have to ask whether you grew up under a rock when it comes to OBP. I undertand the punk ass kids thinking they invented OBP along with sex. LOL! But I can't understand how you think it is a new concept. My dad told me about it when I was a kid. Every great hitter that I ever heard talk about hitting stressed the importance of getting a good pitch to hit and taking their walks. GMs had basic math available to them in the 50's and 60's and they understood the importance of being a patient hitter. There just wasn't an obsession with OBP, because it is not the be all and end all in winning baseball. Sometimes the hitter needs to hack at a 3-1 pitch that is questionable if there are runners in scoring position with 2 out or when there is a man on third with 1 out and Joe McDoofus (AKA Bradley) is on deck and Steven Drew McDoofus is up after him. That would be winning smart baseball. Adding to your OBP there would be pointless. Situational baseball is still the best way to win games, but it doesn't build money stats and OBP has become a money stat rehgardless of production, I.e. Runs score and the popularly hated RBI. OBP has always been around as an important factor. It just wasn't cited as the bible. I laugh when people think that Billy Beane invented it. It is now an overdone statistic, because so much emphasis has been put on it that it is no longer a means to an end but rather the objective of a lot of players and GMs. The other thing that is ridiculously overdone is the shift. HOw's that working out for the genius Maddon this year.