a700hitter

Except that Pavano was a much riskier propostion. He had had only one good year, and he'd had a history of arm ailments. BTW: Where do you think Pavano lands this year?

Isn't $10 million a little pricey for a physical and mental reclamation case?

I wouldn't hold my breath on this.

What you say is true, but why should we look to apply a system of equity to a bunch of juicers. You can never positively identify all the users. Does that mean that no one should get punished? Punish those who got caught. That's all that can be done. That should be a deterrent to those who didn't get caught and those who might think about using PEDs in the future. Pete Rose is probably not the only guy to bet on baseball while playing it, but his ass was banned for life, and he is a stark example of what happens when you get caught. The guys who got caught should get shunned. They took the risk got caught and are paying the price. The others who did not get caught are presumed innocent. Blame the Union that protected the players. If it had not been for their irrational stance on protecting users, more users would have been exposed and justice would be meted out to more than just a select group. Tough s*** for Clemens and the rest that got caught. I laugh that his attorneys are doing an investigation of others who might have testified before the Mitchell Committee as a way to impeach MCNamee's testimony. IIf you want to clear your client's name bring a defamation suit or STFU and go away. In the end, this charade will hurt Clemens more than if he were to come clean, because like Rose he will add the stigma of liar to his already tainted resume. Roger, you are in a hole. Stop digging.

I have heard the argument from Buster Olney, that since PED useage was so widespread it would be unfair to keep out those who were named but to vote for those who might have been using but were never named or caught in a drug test. It's a persuasive argument, but just like the law which is often selectively applied for a deterrent effect, I think the named players and those who failed tests should be excluded from consideration from the Hall. Is it selective justice? Yes, but as cheaters they are not deserving of fairness. They risked their careers by messing with the stuff and they lost their good names. They got caught, so they don't belong. Others got away with cheating, but hopefully future players will see what happened to Clemens, MGwire, and Bonds and will not use the protection of the Union to cheat.

I can remember Yaz being booed by the fans. Yes, Yaz, the one man wrecking crew of the Impossible Dream team and the last Triple Crown winner. There have been none in 40 years since. Never mind '67, Yaz was the one key player that helped transform the Red Six to perennial contenders from a second division team. RSN pays him homage today, but back then he got more negative press than Manny.

I think that it is very hard to quantify the value of having two tremendous stud hitters like Manny and Ortiz in the middle of a lineup. You may be able to find stats that show Manny's effect on Ortiz, based on when Manny is in or out of the lineup. However, I really believe that having a LHH and RHH like Ortiz and Manny creates a dynamic effect on the rest of the lineup that is very hard to quantify. Pitchers focus on those guys not hurting them. They often pitch around them and when they are not pitching around them they have to work extremely hard to get them out. This results in the rest of the lineup seeing more hittable strikes because they are putting the big boys on 1st or 1st and 2nd. It also results in less quality stuff to the remaining hitters, because a pitcher can't hump it up there every pitch. If they do, they can't go as many innings. That is another effect of Manny and Ortiz being in the middle of the lineup. Pitchers have to work so hard that they are done by the 5th inning. I realize that the supporting cast has something to do with this, and I believe that the FO has done a good job of tailoring a patient supporting cast to enhance the Manny-Ortiz effect. Is Manny declining? Maybe so, but even in decline he strikes fear in the hearts of pitchers and his combined effect with Ortiz makes the offense go. When this tandem breaks up, they'll need two solid hitters to replace what Manny brings this lineup. His equals--Pujols and Miggy Cabrera are locked up by other teams.

Although I would never compare Mantle to Dunn, Dunn does hit the ball as hard as anyone that I have ever seen. Also, I am not sure about the park advantage. The right field porch in Yankee Stadium was ridiculously short.

If you consider repeated denials interesting. Like Warner Wolfe said in response to Clemens' lawyers threat that to sue anyone that accuses Clemens of having used steroids. Either sue or shut up. If Roger is serious about clearing his name, let him testify before Congress or sue MLB and MCnamee. Otherwise, it is just propagandist blather. Baseless impassioned denials and personal attacks on McNamee mean nothing.

If you could hit with a glove, Darren Lewis would have been a Hall of Famer.

Kudos to Schilling for speaking out. Many others in baseball are probably thinking the same thing, but don't have the balls to say it publicly, because Clemens is a large intimidating man. Curt is bigger and he doesn't intimidate. He puts himself out there in a genuine way and takes plenty of knocks for being honest. Clemens has never been hon est or genuine. Schilling has a lifetime pass from me for pitching with in his sutured ankle in 2004.

Funny isn't it. One by one the other players are making admissions, including Roberts (against whom the evidence was the most tenuous), but Clemens who has the most pages dedicated to him of any player denies using. If he doesn't bring suit, he should just shut up. He'll probably try digging up dirt on his accuser to discredit him. Stoolies are almost always low-lives, but that doesn't mean their testimony isn't truthful. If Clemen's wants to clear his name, he has one option--- a legal action for libel/slander.

Don't hold your breath. His lawyer gave no indication that Clemens would take any legal action. In fact, he lamented that he had no forum in which to be heard to clear his name. Well that is just not true. He could sue, but he will not. His buddy's admission lend credence to the allegations of his accuser. Truth is a defense against libel or slander. Clemens will not spend millions to be exposed even more.

Good to see ya.

...and occasionally he'll start a fight with an umpire while sitting in the bullpen and get thrown out of the game. Does anyone remember that?

It's come up, but not in any formal report. It really doesn't matter who got named in t he report, except to those individuals who were named. They got burned, but too damn bad. The use of the stuff was rampant during those years. It was ridiculous when you started seeing middle infielders like Boone and Tejada growing 20 inch necks and hitting one-handed Home Runs to the opposite field. The whole era was dirty.

I will, but it's difficult. I am bored too. The only thing remotely interesting right now is whether the Dolphins win in OT... and they just did.

I think it stopped when players were getting hauled in to testify before a grand jury. That happened afte 2003. In 2004, there were a bunch of guys who went cold turkey. Giambi claimed that he had given up Big Macs. Hey, maybe he was referring to his mentor Mark MGwire. He used to be called Big Mac.

I'll bet you are glad that the Rocket took Joba under his wing.