Is the argument that fans don't appreciate Drew as a player or is the issue that he is over paid. Two different issues. In the first issue, you are defending Drew. In the second, you are defending the FO. Whether or not the FO has done a bad job in negotiating a contract resulting in overpayment doesn't affect my opinion about the player's ability. Coming into this season, there was a very valid argument that the FO had overpaid on the contract. I think that argument is becoming less valid. There are other players on the team who I think are overpaid, but who I like having on the team. So, what is the argument here counselor. Are you defending the FO or Drew? They are not the same issue. I like Drew, and I hate when he is not in the lineup, because he is a really good player, but I tend towards thinking that it was a bad contract for the FO. I think ARod is overpaid, but would love having him on my team. Criticism of the contract is not criticism of the player. You are confusing the two issues.