Please justify the point in bold. I don't see why you would arbitrarily drop such a large portion of the data.
It's interesting that you state an interest in seeing the effect of the steroid era without including any years from the tail end of that era in your data chain. Of course, if you did, that's where you see the recent trend. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that you've come rushing in to defend Jacko so frequently lately, and you came in half-cocked again. Maybe it's something else, either way, it's wrong.
Again, no investigation of your own, and a solid lapping up of the ideas of others. If you had looked into this, you would have seen Palodios' errors, but you weren't looking for a correct answer, only self-serving affirmation.
Newton once said he was able to see so far (in the advancement of science) by standing on the shoulders of giants (the scientists that preceded him). I guess you are content to stand on the shoulders of midgets (Sterling and Palodios).