Yeah, the most significant inmormant they had for this investigation was Radomsky (sp), who was a clubhouse assistant with the Mets for over a decade. Per the terms of his plea agreement for his own criminal case for distributing steroids he had to cooperate and assist with the Mitchell investigation.
In 2003 when they had the survey drug testing, about 100 players tested positive. The report is only expected to name between 60 and 80 throughout the whole duration of the "Steroid era." It just point out that while yes, there will be lots of names named, there are a lot of wrongdoers who won; be named here. This, from what i've heard the past day or so, wasn't the most well-done investigation. MLB spent $16 mil to just victimaze a select group of players who they were able to target, offering practically no background or reasons for why certain players were on the list. A few people who were asked to be interviewed stated that during the interview they were repeatedly asked to speculate, or guess, on which players they THINK may have been using, making it clear the the motive here was for Mitchell to just get names out there. Rather than hastily looking to expose x number of players, you would think that after so much time there would be more to this thing. I guess we just have to wait and see come tomorrow to find out what really went down with these millions over the past almost 2 years. I think, however, that if all we get from this report is between 60 and 80 names, and nothing more delving into background or explanations that the investigation was a failure, and only doen to present what looks like a strong effort to crack down and find out what went on.