Right, I only made the point to show that Cano is a better offensive player than his 2008-2010 offensive sampling shows.
Anyway, here's my take on Cano's defense. I like UZR, and I think it's, generally, a reliable metric. But I just don't find its assessment in 2010 of Cano to be accurate. Here's how it breaks down:
Double Play Runs Above Average: 1.3
Range Runs Above Average: -7.5
Error Runs Above Average: 5.6
I don't want to act like my observational evaluation trumps UZR's objective evaluation. But having watched Cano play in about 150 games last year, I just can't agree with the idea that his range was that bad, or even bad at all.