Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

CrespoBlows

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by CrespoBlows

  1. Guzman could probably play 1st, or they could shift Longoria over from 3B. Bankston could probably help as well.
  2. They should go get Michael Turner.
  3. Bonds hit 742 in the 1st inning.
  4. Don't think he would have made that play.
  5. Manningham and Monk would have been top 10 had they been eligible.
  6. I thought you were refering to the overall draft class. Oh, and a reach by San Diego with Davis.
  7. That solves this mystery.
  8. Alan Branch could probably go #23 to KC.
  9. Good pick, might draw some Florida fans to watch the Jaguars, and he can step in right now.
  10. Nelson?
  11. They'll probably take a WR.
  12. Wasn't it the 3rd game of the 2005 season?
  13. ATL - James COL - Francis
  14. I try, but I sometimes will miss an inning when I drop a deuce, grabbing a meal, etc.. You know, the stuff that can't be put off.
  15. You can't possibly watch every inning, every play, of Coco Crisp's performance. We use stats to help us out. They are a measure of performance. This is so f***ing stupid. If Coco Crisp is such an amazing fielder, why does every fielding metric have him as below average in CF? He's a great LF, but he's not a good CF. It's really that simple. I mean, even watching the guy play, he makes bad reads, doesn't have ANY arm, and throws with little accuracy. Even your dumbass can admit that. David Eckstein makes great plays, and I'm pretty sure Wes Helms has too, but you don't rate a player on making great plays. You don't want us to use stats, yet you use one right here? It also happens to be the worst stat to use for a fielder.
  16. They are faulty, but they seem to be accurate. I think EVERYONE on the board would agree that Pena is a 50X better CF, then he is a RF, and that shows up in the stats, too. CF - +9 RF - (-)14 Coco Crisp has the same trend. I remember many people touting him as a GG LF in Cleveland, which was probably correct. LF - +20 CF - (-)19
×
×
  • Create New...