Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

RedSoxRooter

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by RedSoxRooter

  1. Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh :lol:
  2. Well, FOULKES COMIN' IN BABY!!!!!! WOOHOOO!!!!
  3. Pap is up. Man, Foulke really must not be right.
  4. Seanez sucks. Didn't Theo get rid of him once before????
  5. You think they'll have enough trust in Foulke tonight to pitch him???? :dance:
  6. Now that Clement has shaved off that thing on his face, he looks a little like Bruce Hurst.
  7. I use MS Paint. The block brush OWNS.
  8. A lefty comes in. hmmm. You think Wily Mo gets in the game sometime?
  9. Clement will have a solid year this year - the whole year. You'll see.
  10. the math skills came in handy in rounding the numbers up and down.
  11. Newsflash folks, almost every MLB player - especially it's stars - does currently do steroids. Our friendly Sox stars as well. It is and has been a part of the game for at least 20 years. I'm convinced.
  12. suck it, yankee fan. suck it.
  13. Just for shits and giggles, I decided to go back to Foulke's horrid 2005 and put together what his final line would have been if played the entire season based on the number of games he played in 2004. The multiplier is 1.65 (or pretty close) So his numbers were this: 2004 72 G, 83 IP, 63 H, 22 R, 20 ER, 8 HR, 15 BB, 79 K, 5 W, 3 L, 32 SV, 7 BLSV, 2.17 ERA 2005 71 G, 75 IP, 87 H, 50 R, 50 ER, 13HR, 30 BB, 56 K, 8 W, 8 L, 25 SV, 7 BLSV, 5.91 ERA I don't know what's more impressive, the 50 runs in 75 innings, walking twice as many batters as '04, or that he'd have the same amount of blown saves. :dunno: (I'm not really making a point here, just showing off my amazing math skills)
  14. Welcome to the site. So let me get this straight, you live in Montana and the first MLB game you're going to is in Tampa Bay??? Not quite the introduction you probably would want, but hey, you may see a fight or three.
  15. That's actually a very good point. Tito probably would have used Foulke if the game wasn't Beckett's first start with the team - and an emotional one at that. To lose last nights game would have been much worse for Foulke in Boston than if Pap had lost it.
  16. I'd keep Foulke as the closer and use Papelbon as the backup plan - just like Tito intends to do. If they can get Foulke back to his old self then that will be one hell of a bullpen (once they dump Saenez and Riskie). I think it's entirely too early in the season to promote a guy who has exactly 1 career save as your closer. Honestly, I'm more worried about the offense than the Foulke/Papelbon debate.
  17. nice! 9-4
  18. what is it, 6-4 Oakland?
  19. I think I just... yup. I just s*** myself.
  20. That's great to hear. Jsinger - that's just such a badass avatar.
  21. Tex, same here. I think we missed the postgame. Mike Adams will probably be on next.
  22. I dread Chicago. That's gonna suck. You can put that on the scoreboard.
  23. Not comparing Papelbon to Rivera, but I used to say the same damn thing about him. I thought it was a waste to use him as a closer. Shows how much I know.
  24. Well, we better hope Paps can do the job.
  25. STOP CALLING HIM THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...