Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    Mookie Betts 2.0: Rafael Devers Trade Continues Harrowing Red Sox Tradition

    For the second time in five years, the Boston Red Sox have told their fans that the franchise's ego is more important than winning.

    Brandon Glick
    Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

    Mookie Betts. Xander Bogaerts. Rafael Devers.

    The last three faces of the historic Boston Red Sox franchise, all World Series champions, are now playing out the remainder of their primes for the big dogs in the NL West. It's hard to talk about this with any semblance of emotional and analytical clarity, because the value that trio of superstars brought to Boston extended so far beyond the walls of Fenway.

    The Betts deal, which has been panned ad nauseam for the last half-decade, at least made an iota of sense if you squinted hard enough. An MVP winner in the final year of his deal, the Red Sox's competitive window with their current core had expired (supposedly), and thus, instead of paying him a record amount, the team flipped him for a bundle of prospects and MLB-ready pieces with upside. Even at the time, the return was thought to be weak — and it certainly hasn't aged well — but from a team-building perspective, the logic was understandable, even if the execution was so deeply flawed.

    This... this is harder to explain. Devers' contract doesn't expire until after the 2033 season, when the third baseman/designated hitter will be 36. He was the last remaining core pillar of that 2018 team, an in-his-prime slugger with superstar bonafides. In case 162-game averages of 33 home runs, 107 RBIs, and a 128 OPS+ aren't enough to make you swoon, he has a career .955 OPS in 26 postseason games, all played before he turned 25 years old.

    The San Francisco Giants, who have famously struggled for years to attract legitimate stars to their team, have now had one fall directly in their laps for a laughable acquisition cost. They benefit tremendously from a bizarre situation, one which only is made weirder by the fact that the Red Sox swept the rival New York Yankees mere hours before officially completing the deal. Against the Yankees and Tampa Bay Rays, the team has gone 7-2 over their last nine, a stretch that has them back over .500 and in spitting distance of a Wild Card spot.

    This deal raises so, so many questions, both now and in the future. What does this mean for Alex Bregman's future, now that the team has opened up third base and plenty of salary over the long haul? How did the Red Sox get such a light haul for one of the sport's most recognizable players? What will the locker room reaction be to losing the team's premier star? Is the front office safe if the team falters in the second half?

    However, no question is more important than this: what will Roman Anthony, Marcelo Mayer, Kristian Campbell, and every future star free agent think of the team's willingness to put its own ego over loyalty to its biggest stars? Even if Devers really did want out of Boston — which is rooted in the fractured relationship the front office has with him over the very public posturing during his position change to DH — this doesn't look good, no matter how the PR team will try to spin it. This is the Luka Dončić trade of baseball, and Craig Breslow is Nico Harrison. 

    The 2025 season is now no longer the team's top priority, despite their recent flirtation with winning. The future is here, if only because the front office and ownership are forcing everyone to look forward. Grief — especially grief born of losing someone you've come to cherish — is never easy to handle, even in a large, communal setting.

    At least Red Sox fans can say they already know the feeling.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    39 minutes ago, Maxbialystock said:

    That sounds pro-Devers and I have absolutely no problem with it.  I'm fine with the trade, but am positive Breslow lied to Devers and generally screwed him over.  The Giants should do the opposite.  

    again, I don't think Breslow is a liar.  He's not the one who made that promise to Dever. 

    If someone hired me to run an organization, and I go in with a plan I try to execute it.  If that goes against someone else plan before me I certainly try to handle it in a decent way but if there's no middle ground.  I let that person go.  It's very telling that the F.O. is seemingly in Breslows corner in this.  As I've said before, I'm sure it could have been handled differently but at the end of the day sometimes parting ways is just the right thing to do. 

    It's like when a relationship ends.  Sometimes people outgrow each other, it's not like there always has to be one definitive bad guy and that's where I think a lot of people are getting hung up here.  Someone has to be the bad guy, we all love someone to blame. 

    9 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    again, I don't think Breslow is a liar.  He's not the one who made that promise to Dever. 

    If someone hired me to run an organization, and I go in with a plan I try to execute it.  If that goes against someone else plan before me I certainly try to handle it in a decent way but if there's no middle ground.  I let that person go.  It's very telling that the F.O. is seemingly in Breslows corner in this.  As I've said before, I'm sure it could have been handled differently but at the end of the day sometimes parting ways is just the right thing to do. 

    It's like when a relationship ends.  Sometimes people outgrow each other, it's not like there always has to be one definitive bad guy and that's where I think a lot of people are getting hung up here.  Someone has to be the bad guy, we all love someone to blame. 

    I think the "lie" was when Breslow told Devers that there was no truth in them trying to sign Bregman. 

    41 minutes ago, Bellhorn04 said:

    Heck no, we're all just guessing our asses off the way we always do.  

    Too true.  But I'm pretty sure Raffy was not told about losing the 3b position until spring training.  And I'm pretty sure that Cora sold him on DH, where Raffy wasn't as good as JDM or Big Papi, but he was still awfully good.   So my villain is Breslow and maybe Kennedy.

    But right now I really don't care because I agree with the trade and like where the Sox are.  They've won 6 straight without Bregman, without Abreu, and with not much help from Devers.  This 6 game winning streak is much needed and fantastic and all because of the pitching.  Anyone could have DH'd for Devers and the Sox still win all 6.   If the Giants taking over Raffy's salary allows Breslow to get another starter like Crochet, I'm all for it.  

    Time will tell us a lot more, as it always does.  

    30 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    again, I don't think Breslow is a liar.  He's not the one who made that promise to Dever. 

    If someone hired me to run an organization, and I go in with a plan I try to execute it.  If that goes against someone else plan before me I certainly try to handle it in a decent way but if there's no middle ground.  I let that person go.  It's very telling that the F.O. is seemingly in Breslows corner in this.  As I've said before, I'm sure it could have been handled differently but at the end of the day sometimes parting ways is just the right thing to do. 

    It's like when a relationship ends.  Sometimes people outgrow each other, it's not like there always has to be one definitive bad guy and that's where I think a lot of people are getting hung up here.  Someone has to be the bad guy, we all love someone to blame. 

    I support Breslow too.  I blame him for Devers being po'd, but that was probably going to happen anyway when Bregman took over at 3b.  I like Breslow more than Bloom, but some of that is because JH allowed him to go after both Bregman and Crochet.  Keeping Raffy as a DH was too expensive.  

    As others have said, the Giants are sure to learn from this and figure out a better way to get Devers to 1b.  

    3 hours ago, mvp 78 said:

    What do you mean that I "bulked up" Raffy's number? 

    His OPS is .905, not 1.000.  And it's been going down steadily since Bregman's injury.  I loved having him at DH, even for the whole season, but agree he would have to play 1b to justify the $330M.  

    Needing a great bat to replace Casas was absolute baloney because he was having a bad year before the injury.  

    I think it's fine to have enjoyed Raffy while he was with the Sox and to agree with the trade.  Breslow might be a fibber, but I like where this team is going.,  He screwed up on Sale, but Giolito, like Frankenstein, now seems to be alive.  I watched almost all of his pitches last night and thought his heater and breaking stuff were both working.  10 K's ain't hay, especially when 3 of them came with the bases loaded.  Now all the Sox need to do is keep hermits and torches away from him.  

    42 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    I think the "lie" was when Breslow told Devers that there was no truth in them trying to sign Bregman. 

    Yeah this, and - we want Bregman to play 2nd base.

    Stupid, unnecessary, and easily avoided. But after that, it's all Cora and mostly Devers.

    On 6/17/2025 at 3:02 PM, mvp 78 said:

    I think the "lie" was when Breslow told Devers that there was no truth in them trying to sign Bregman. 

    Devers has no right to know what Breslow is going to do with respect to making trades.  If he misled Devers at all due to his curiosity that was just smart baseball because leaking the Bregman deal could have ruined the deal.

     

    40 minutes ago, TedYazPapiMookie said:

    Devers has no right to know what Breslow is going to do with respect to making trades.  If he misled Devers at all due to his curiosity that was just smart baseball because leaking the Bregman deal could have ruined the deal.

     

    Devers, a guy being paid franchise altering money, has no right to know the plans about his future? That doesn’t make sense to me.

    7 hours ago, mvp 78 said:

    Devers, a guy being paid franchise altering money, has no right to know the plans about his future? That doesn’t make sense to me.

    It's not his job and he lacks the maturity to fulfill the role of team leader.  He leads by trying to achieve goals not by being a great example for younger players.  

    Breslow has been praised by many in the media for keeping a lid on his deals.  I don't understand what's so hard to understand.   

    Devers isn't a Yaz or a Williams who earned the respect of the franchise to have trades run by them.  Devers is just a slightly above average hitter with no defensive skills.  He never took the time to learn to speak English playing on an American baseball team.  Nothing about Devers was about team.  It was always about Devers.  I am so glad he is gone.  One more expulsion and this clubhouse might be cohesive like it should be.  Bregman and Crochet need to pick up where Mookie, Bogey and JD left off as the leaders.  Even they wouldn't be consulted by Breslow if he wanted to make a trade.  They haven't earned it.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...