Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    Can the Red Sox Mimic the Braves?


    Maddie Landis

    Thanks to team-friendly extensions and a willingness to move on when before fan favorites hit their decline phase, Atlanta is now six years into a sustained run of excellence. Can the Red Sox follow their lead?

    Red Sox Video

    From 2014 to 2017, the Braves were a mediocre team, mustering losing records in four consecutive seasons. The 2017 Atlanta Braves finished third in the National League East with a 72-90 record. The following season, they reversed their record to 90-72 and claimed their first division title in five years. Under the helm of their new general manager, Alex Anthopolous, the Braves ushered in a new era of sustained success, netting six division titles from 2018 to 2023, including back-to-back 100-win seasons in 2022 and 2023. 

    The Braves have utilized three key strategies to achieve sustainable success:

    1. A strong core of prospects emerging in subsequent seasons.
    2. Sustainable financial management.
    3. A demonstrated willingness to part ways with homegrown talent.

    Talent Pipeline

    The Braves have built a consistent pipeline of talent that’s been a key factor in their sustained success. 

    Looking at 2026 and beyond, Jose Perdomo (SS), Hurston Waldrep (RP), and Drake Baldwin (C) are amongst the next wave of prospects to contribute to the team. The steady influx of homegrown impact talent gives the team valuable internal resources, reduces the need for free-agent signings, and provides financial flexibility.

    Financial Sustainability

    Despite being a large market team, the Braves spend their money wisely. According to Cot's Contracts, Atlanta's 2025 payroll is currently the ninth-highest in baseball. The Braves' core has been built around buying out their homegrown players' arbitration years and retaining them during their prime. 

    Only 2.1% of the Braves' 2025 roster is arbitration-eligible, the lowest percentage in the league.

    • 2B: Ozzie Albies (28), seven years, $35 million from 2019-2025 with 2026-27 club options
    • 3B: Austin Riley (27), 10 years, $212 million from 2023-2032 with 2033 club option
    • OF: Ronald Acuña Jr. (27), eight years, $100 million from 2019-2026 with 2027-28 club options
    • OF: Michael Harris II (23), eight years, $72 million from 2023-2030 with 2031-32 club options
    • SP: Spencer Strider (26), six year, $75 million from 2023-2028 with 2029 club option

    When you consider these players' performances, their contracts look like bargains. Generally speaking, MLB players reach their peak performance between the ages of 27 and 29, with a typical decline starting around age 30. The Braves' core is secured through their prime years, and their extensions also account for potential aging curves. Factoring in club options, Albies' contract ends at age 30, Acuña's at age 30, Harris's at age 31, and Strider's at age 30. 

    Moreover, the Braves are quick to pounce on extensions with players they acquired via trade.

    • 1B: Matt Olson (30), eight years, $168 million from 2022-2029
    • C: Sean Murphy (30), six years, $73 million from 2023-2028 with a 2029 club option
    • SP: Reynaldo López (31), three years $30 million from 2025-2027
    • RP: Raisel Iglesias (35), four years, $58 million from 2022-2025

    Aside from shortstop and one or two outfield positions, their starting nine and rotation have been set since 2022. Since their core is retained throughout the next decade, the Braves aren’t connected to premier free agents in the offseason. Who needs Juan Soto when you have Acuña at home?

    The Braves have shown a demonstrated willingness to part ways with homegrown talent either via free agency or trades. Consider the following moves: 

    • March 2022: Traded Cristian Pache, Shea Langeliers, Joey Estes, and Ryan Cusick for Matt Olson (27)
    • March 2022: Freddie Freeman (33), signed a six-year, $162-million contract with the Dodgers
    • December 2022: Dansby Swanson (29), signed a seven-year, $177-million contract with the Cubs
    • December 2022: William Contreras (25), acquired Sean Murphy
    • November 2024: Travis d’Arnaud (35): signed a two-year, $12-million contract with the Angels
    • December 2024: Max Fried (30): signed an eight-year, $218-million contract with the Yankees

    The Braves have a history of letting homegrown talent walk, but they consistently fill those spots with younger, often comparable (if not better) players. They were happy to let Freddie Freeman walk with the younger, cheaper Matt Olson available. Dansby Swanson was another key departure, but the Braves were able to redirect resources toward extending players like Olson, Austin Riley, and Sean Murphy. In December 2022, the Braves moved William Contreras, who they viewed more as a designated hitter, for Sean Murphy, a defense-first catcher. Subsequently, the Braves had the best catching tandem in the league with Travis d’Arnaud and Sean Murphy.

    Going into the 2024 season, the Braves needed an everyday outfielder. They traded Jackson Kowar and Cole Philips to the Mariners for Jarred Kelenic, Marco Gonzalez, and Evan White. This wasn’t the flashiest move for the Braves, but it filled a need for the team, and they secured a young, cost-controlled outfielder for the future. This offseason the Braves chose not to pursue Travis d’Arnaud and Max Fried. Both players are aging, and they have a considerable number of pitching prospects and Drake Baldwin who can take over d’Arnaud’s role as backup catcher in the future.

    Is it possible for other teams, like the Red Sox, to mimic the Braves' sustained success? The Red Sox' current roster construction model closely aligns with the Braves' strategies, suggesting that a similar approach could lead to long-term success.

    Talent Pipeline 

    Roman Anthony and Kristian Campbell are expected to make their major league debuts this year. If he has an outstanding year in Worcester, Marcelo Mayer could also see some big-league action later in the season. Beyond 2025, David Sandlin (friend of the Talk Sox podcast) and Jhostynxon Garcia could join the team in 2026. Though he isn’t a homegrown prospect, Grissom is akin to a new player for the Red Sox this year.

    While conducting research for this piece, I noticed that Braves infielders usually have one to two “bad” seasons before finding their stride:

    • Dansby Swanson slashed .246/.322/.348, 77 OPS+, and 0.9 bWAR during his first two seasons. 
    • Ozzie Albies’ WAR jumped from 1.3 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2018. 
    • Austin Riley had a negative WAR from 2019 to 2020 before he produced a 6.3 WAR season in 2021. 

    Given the trend of Braves infielders taking a couple of seasons to fully develop, Grissom could be the key difference-maker, potentially turning the team from a .500 record into a wild-card contender. At the very least, he should have a shot to be the starting second baseman this year. He partook in the annual Story camp and looks healthier than he did last year. Some players face growing pains at the major league level. Many Red Sox fans wrote off Jarren Duran before his breakout 2024 season. During his rookie year, Casas looked like a lost cause before posting monster numbers during the second half of the season.

    Sustainable Financials

    The Red Sox currently have a cost-controlled core to build around. 

    • Rafael Devers (28): 10-year, $313.5 million from 2024-2033
    • Brayan Bello (25): 6-year, $55 million from 2024-2029 with a 2030 club option
    • Ceddane Rafaela (24) - 8-year, $50 million from 2024-2031, with a 2032 club option

    Factoring in club options, Devers' contract ends at age 37, Bello’s contract ends at age 31, and Rafaela’s at age 32, so the Red Sox have control of these players through their prime.

    The team has a plethora of young talent that can be signed to reasonable cost-controlled deals. Triston Casas, Tanner Houck, and Garret Crochet are extension targets. If Roman Anthony hits the ground running after he’s called up, he’s also in the mix for an extension. Since the Red Sox haven’t gone after premier free agents, such as Corbin Burnes and Max Fried, this offseason, they have money to allocate toward extending Crochet. 

    The Red Sox spent money for the sake of it and are now stuck with Masataka Yoshida, who doesn’t fit with the team’s current roster construction. Signing Alex Bregman might lead to another Yoshida conundrum. The Red Sox have a lot of right-handed second-base depth with Vaughn Grissom, Romy Gonzalez, and Kristian Campbell. All of whom hit left-handed pitchers better than Bregman in recent years.

     

    AD_4nXcqgbRtjfX99PTnhWOLZMxL4vIL02LF9XNoGQmRkdErkr1nrRI2eFFZ_NGtjCyrnAAythNxM7CSXDBjIdmjaM69GoGckjjGl6BgVpwInoC3GzBFCuNMpPTgxjQJ3SDoCeFnTpeV?key=N-wFTiQE6-rxKaXAHAjz85wY

    Money is finite, and I’d rather see the Red Sox leverage their second base depth for the 2025 season rather than commit to a long-term contract with Bregman. The funds for his contract could be better spent on player extensions.

    Parting Ways With Homegrown Talent

    The Red Sox traded Kyle Teel, Braden Montgomery, Chase Meidroth, and Wikelman González to the White Sox for Crochet. Amongst this group of prospects, Teel is the closest to his major league debut. Meidroth was blocked by the aforementioned group of second baseman and Montgomery and González’s major league ETA isn’t imminent. Starting pitching, especially a left-handed option, was a known need for the team, and the Red Sox nabbed the frontline trade target of the 2024-2025 offseason. On the same day the Red Sox traded Teel, they acquired Carlos Narváez, a defense-first catcher, to help offset the loss. 

    Jarren Duran is set to become a free agent in 2033, at the age of 33. The Red Sox should keep him during his arbitration years, but let him walk once he hits free agency. As he ages, his speed is likely to decline, and it's a huge piece of his game. It’s more prudent to invest in younger players instead.

    The Braves are the perfect model for roster construction, demonstrating controlled, sustainable success, and the Red Sox have the opportunity to emulate their approach. There’s a wave of prospects ready to join the Red Sox in the upcoming years. They have the financial flexibility to extend young talent like Crochet, Casas, and Anthony, allowing them to build upon their core of Devers, Bello, and Rafaela.

    The Red Sox should continue to spend their money wisely and avoid large free-agent signings when they have a ton of talent knocking at the door. However, that doesn’t mean they should refrain from investing in the team. After all, they’re one of the most valuable sports franchises. Locking up their young talent and filling roster holes with shrewd free agent signings is the best way to follow the Braves.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I think they have a strong core of young bats they can extend, but the pitching side is VERY light when compared to the Braves. It would be in the same vein of the Braves, but not really duplicating what they were able to do. Also, I wouldn't call Devers "cost controlled" when compared to Ozzie Albies in this model. 

    1 hour ago, mvp 78 said:

    I think they have a strong core of young bats they can extend, but the pitching side is VERY light when compared to the Braves. It would be in the same vein of the Braves, but not really duplicating what they were able to do. Also, I wouldn't call Devers "cost controlled" when compared to Ozzie Albies in this model. 

    They are "light" on top pitching prospects, when compared to the Braves and many other MLB farm systems, but I do think the turn-around has begun. While only 1 top 7 prospect is a pitcher (Perales at #4,) pitchers dominate the mid and lower levels of our prospect rankings list.

    After the top 7, 13 of the next 19 are pitchers. 18 of the bottom 36 are also pitchers. I think there is a good chance we see some of these guys jump in the rankings, while many will fall or stay even. (I'm not counting moving up due to top prospects graduating in 2025.)

    The addition of pitchers on the farm and the bigs goes beyond just prospects. Brez non-prospect pitcher additions also include: Crochet (younger than some ranked prospects,) Slaten, Criswell, Priester, Weissert, plus Buehler, Giolito, Sandoval, Chapman, Hendriks, Fulmer, Wilson and several others.

    They have a lot of guys that can start, but nobody that jumps off the page at you that needs to be extended: Dobbins, Early, Sandlin, Perales, Fitts, Priester, etc. I don't know if any of them project to be more than a 4 right now at best, so I wouldn't bother extending them as the $ isn't worth the injury risk. 

    6 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    They have a lot of guys that can start, but nobody that jumps off the page at you that needs to be extended: Dobbins, Early, Sandlin, Perales, Fitts, Priester, etc. I don't know if any of them project to be more than a 4 right now at best, so I wouldn't bother extending them as the $ isn't worth the injury risk. 

    Indeed. Maybe, after this year, we might have 1-3 that we start those sorts of debates about, 

    If Perales can finally get healthy, he could be one.

    Guys like Fitts, Priester, Dobbins, Early and Sandlin need to do things we have not seen them do, before. That does happen, sometimes, but usually there are some early signs of high skills, such as one to two nasty pitchers already developed.

    The younger pitchers have a more wide-open future outlook. Tolle is 22, but starts his first professional season in 2025.

    Valera, Cason and Reyes are just 18. Others are 19-20ish.

    3 hours ago, mvp 78 said:

    I think they have a strong core of young bats they can extend, but the pitching side is VERY light when compared to the Braves. It would be in the same vein of the Braves, but not really duplicating what they were able to do. Also, I wouldn't call Devers "cost controlled" when compared to Ozzie Albies in this model. 

    Aside from Fried, the Braves initial wave of prospects from 2017-2021 didn't include many pitchers.

    Their second wave of prospects contains more pitchers, ex. Spencer Strider and Bryce Elder (2022), AJ Smith-Shawver (2023),  Spencer Schwellenbach (2024) and Hurston Waldrep (2024).

    The Red Sox drafted 14 pitchers last year so I think the pitching prospects will come in time, possibly a couple of years after this current group.

    I agree though that the pitching side is significantly lighter than the Braves... Amongst our current group of pitchers, we don't have big names that jump out like Strider or Fried. However, many frontline pitchers (Tarik Skubal and Zac Gallen off the top of my head) were drafted in later rounds.

    7 minutes ago, Maddie Landis said:

    Aside from Fried, the Braves initial wave of prospects from 2017-2021 didn't include many pitchers.

    Their second wave of prospects contains more pitchers, ex. Spencer Strider and Bryce Elder (2022), AJ Smith-Shawver (2023),  Spencer Schwellenbach (2024) and Hurston Waldrep (2024).

    The Red Sox drafted 14 pitchers last year so I think the pitching prospects will come in time, possibly a couple of years after this current group.

    I agree though that the pitching side is significantly lighter than the Braves... Amongst our current group of pitchers, we don't have big names that jump out like Strider or Fried. However, many frontline pitchers (Tarik Skubal and Zac Gallen off the top of my head) were drafted in later rounds.

    Strider was drafted by ATL in 2020, so if we count him as part of the "recent wave" of Braves pitching prospects, then can't we also count:

    Slaten, Fitts and Priester, although not in our system from day 1.

    Couldn't these guys be counted in the first wave 2017-2021? 
    Houck, Bello, Crawford, Whitlock (NYY system), Wink (KCR/BOS systems) and Perales

    55 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Indeed. Maybe, after this year, we might have 1-3 that we start those sorts of debates about, 

    If Perales can finally get healthy, he could be one.

    After this year, Perales will only have one option season left to figure out how to be a starter before having to be put on an MLB roster permanently. I think we are 50/50 that he's heading to the pen once he's fully rehabbed and in BOS plans. 

    53 minutes ago, Maddie Landis said:

    Aside from Fried, the Braves initial wave of prospects from 2017-2021 didn't include many pitchers.

    Their second wave of prospects contains more pitchers, ex. Spencer Strider and Bryce Elder (2022), AJ Smith-Shawver (2023),  Spencer Schwellenbach (2024) and Hurston Waldrep (2024).

    The Red Sox drafted 14 pitchers last year so I think the pitching prospects will come in time, possibly a couple of years after this current group.

    I agree though that the pitching side is significantly lighter than the Braves... Amongst our current group of pitchers, we don't have big names that jump out like Strider or Fried. However, many frontline pitchers (Tarik Skubal and Zac Gallen off the top of my head) were drafted in later rounds.

    Until the Sox start cranking out some legitimate starting prospects, I'm going to remain skeptical. Houck took 5 years to develop at the MLB level before becoming a DUDE everyone wanted to extend. Aside from him, there hasn't been much to write home about. I know there's been additional focus and Breslow cares about it more than any of us do, but I'm reticent to believe in a real pitching pipeline here due to team history. 

    I know they are very high on Tolle and I'll be watching his starts closely this year. Don't really have much to say about the other draftees since they didn't pitch in professional games last year. 8 of the 14 pitchers they drafted were after the 10th round and that's really just throwing stuff at the wall and see what sticks. Most likely some relief arms. 

    I'm not sure how moving away from scouting and moving towards metrics and driveline impacted their drafting effectiveness. Maybe they can pick up some more under the radar guys? Maybe it's just more of the same? IDK. 

    I actually think our pitching is closer to the braves than our offense.

    Last year, their top position player didnt play a position, he was a DH :0

    The year before they had 3 silver sluggers and Ozuna the fourth big bat , received MVP votes.

    Our hitting is not on this level. I was screaming about getting Ozuna years back.

    It shouldnt be too hard to get there.  The league is underrating the impact of DH's/1Bs who mash. All you have to do is stop obsessing about defense, pitching, all these other peripheral things and return to what we did when we were successfull.

    Prioritize hitting
     

    43 minutes ago, drewski6 said:

    I actually think our pitching is closer to the braves than our offense.

    Last year, their top position player didnt play a position, he was a DH :0

    The year before they had 3 silver sluggers and Ozuna the fourth big bat , received MVP votes.

    Our hitting is not on this level. I was screaming about getting Ozuna years back.

    It shouldnt be too hard to get there.  The league is underrating the impact of DH's/1Bs who mash. All you have to do is stop obsessing about defense, pitching, all these other peripheral things and return to what we did when we were successfull.

    Prioritize hitting
     

    Isn't that what we have been doing? Anthony, Campbell, Mayer, Teel, Montgomery....

    We have not drafted a pitcher, first, since 2016 (Jay Groome.)



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...