Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
With our pen being overworked and in shambles, going longer into games has been great for ERod, but in almost every other category of measurement, he is doing worse than 2018 (and in some, 2017 as well):

 

ERA

4.19 2017

3.82 2018

 

 

ERA+

109

116

107

 

WHIP

1.28

1.26

1.32

 

FIP

3.97

3.65

4.03

 

IP/GS

5.7 (4th on team)

5.4 (4th on team)

5.9 (leads team)

 

QS%

50% (5th on team)

30% (4th on team)

37% (4th on team)

 

Run Support/GS

3.5

5.9

7.8

 

Team winning %

54%

83%

74%

 

Strange the team won more with ERod last year, despite scoring 2 more runs for him this year!

 

Not sure there is much strange about it. You can blame Manfred for our inability to use year to year stats to measure growth or even effectiveness any longer. What would Erods stats be if they had not changed the baseball yet again?

 

The fact is ERod's Change has turned into a real weapon for him. The problem is that it does not buy a pitcher much playing Manfred-ball. more K's maybe for what that is worth.

Edited by jung
  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Not sure there is much strange about it. You can blame Manfred for our inability to use year to year stats to measure growth or even effectiveness any longer. What would Erods stats be if they had not changed the baseball yet again?

 

The fact is ERod's Change has turned into a real weapon for him. The problem is that it does not buy a pitcher much playing Manfred-ball. more K's maybe for what that is worth.

 

Good points, but the Manfred ball does not explain everything.

 

AL ERA

4.38 2017

4.27 2018

4.56 2019

 

FIP

4.39

4.23

4.56

 

WHIP

1.33

1.31

1.34

 

ERod

 

ERA

4.19 2017 (0.19 below AL ERA)

3.82 2018 (0.45 below)

4.43 2019 (0.13 below)

 

WHIP

1.28 (.05 below)

1.26 (.05 below)

1.32 (.02 below)

 

FIP

3.97 (0.22 below)

3.65 (0.68 below)

4.03 (0.53 below)

 

The adjustments do help ERod look better, but all the major numbers, except IP/GS are worse than 2018 after adjusting to league averages.

Posted
Good points, but the Manfred ball does not explain everything.

 

AL ERA

4.38 2017

4.27 2018

4.56 2019

 

FIP

4.39

4.23

4.56

 

WHIP

1.33

1.31

1.34

 

ERod

 

ERA

4.19 2017 (0.19 below AL ERA)

3.82 2018 (0.45 below)

4.43 2019 (0.13 below)

 

WHIP

1.28 (.05 below)

1.26 (.05 below)

1.32 (.02 below)

 

FIP

3.97 (0.22 below)

3.65 (0.68 below)

4.03 (0.53 below)

 

The adjustments do help ERod look better, but all the major numbers, except IP/GS are worse than 2018 after adjusting to league averages.

Nothing explains everything, but the ball is supercharged and it is ruining the statistical integrity of the game.
Posted
Nothing explains everything, but the ball is supercharged and it is ruining the statistical integrity of the game.

 

I agree. The HR numbers are way out of whack, but league ERA has not risen all that much, and ERod's HR/9 number is not that much higher than recent years or his career number.

 

1.3 2019 and 2016

1.2 career and 2017

1.1 in 2018

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...