Fenway now on the National Register of Historic Places

[Dojji]

I may bring crazy theories to the forum, but if I hadn't given up on "getting personal" every time I'm contradicted, I would have been banned awhile ago. Was banned from a couple sites and got warned repeatedly on this one before I cleaned up my act a bit.

 

Besides, spontaneously combusting every time the world doesn't agree with you just makes you a particularly irresistable bit of trollbait. I speak from personal experience.

[Emmz]

J_E:

 

Makes irrational, simplistic statement.

 

Back this up with unequivalent, even more irrational statement.

 

Trolls with u mad esque macros/witless comeback not applying to discussion.

 

Hates Rick Santorum LOL.

[Dojji]

I don't lose arguments' date=' I finish them.[/quote']

 

Two problems with that.

 

1: You don't, really. Otherwise there wouldn't be multiple threads in the last year, several pages of which are you and at least one other poster exchanging heavy artillery fire.

2: It's the proclamations of victory that you do after you "finish them" that gets you trolled here

 

Oh, and

 

3: Five of the last five biggest flamewars on this board have involved you. Think about that.

[ibot2much]

 

I don't lose arguments, I finish them, and with particularly trollish subjects, I make them go off crying about how "i'm so antagonistic" LOL.

 

Funny stuff again from the Bitter Old Babe

[Dojji]

J_E:

 

Makes irrational, simplistic statement.

 

Back this up with unequivalent, even more irrational statement.

 

Trolls with u mad esque macros/witless comeback not applying to discussion.

 

Hates Rick Santorum LOL.

 

Not sure I'm supposed to regard this as an argument, or a bit of antagonistic freeverse?

 

I tend to favor freeverse.

[Emmz]

I may bring crazy theories to the forum, but if I hadn't given up on "getting personal" every time I'm contradicted, I would have been banned awhile ago. Was banned from a couple sites and got warned repeatedly on this one before I cleaned up my act a bit.

 

Besides, spontaneously combusting every time the world doesn't agree with you just makes you a particularly irresistable bit of trollbait. I speak from personal experience.

 

You still do get personal, and I totally don't combust. I discuss the issues and it only gets to the next level when someone starts to call out my posting style or what not.

 

Example from this thread is a perfect example of people getting upset because I disagreed with someone. He then proceeded to say I haven't changed. Thats a personal attack when I was clearly not trying to be argumentative. You just took the chance to insert your own opinion of my posting style. Thats attacking a poster, not a post, and you do it in like all of your posts.

 

Thats personal.

[Emmz]

Not sure I'm supposed to regard this as an argument, or a bit of antagonistic freeverse?

 

I tend to favor freeverse.

 

I gave J_E his chance to have a legit discussion.

[Emmz]

Funny stuff again from the Bitter Old Babe

 

Hey, look who drops in for another snipe. And I'm bitter? LOL stalker.

[a700hitter]

They have standards for rim heights. Missing the point in typical JE fashion.

Has he had a single non-trolling post in one of the Sports threads in the past year or two? Seriously, he brings nothing to the table... nothing. Keep Shaughnessy, dump J_E.

[Emmz]

Two problems with that.

 

1: You don't, really. Otherwise there wouldn't be multiple threads in the last year, several pages of which are you and at least one other poster exchanging heavy artillery fire.

2: It's the proclamations of victory that you do after you "finish them" that gets you trolled here

 

Oh, and

 

3: Five of the last five biggest flamewars on this board have involved you. Think about that.

 

No one likes losing, I get that. And subjective all the way through. They've probably involved you too.

[a700hitter]

Funny stuff again from the Bitter Old Babe

She is definitely not old. You must be mistaking her for someone else.

[mvp 78]

Hey' date=' look who drops in for another snipe. And I'm bitter? LOL stalker.[/quote']

 

What's their definition of old? That part confuses me.

[Emmz]

Wait, why is it that only Dojji doesn'y like me? Last I checked I had a pretty good approval rating as a poster here. Dojji, can you say that?

[Emmz]

She is definitely not old. You must be mistaking her for someone else.

 

He keeps using it as a troll tactic. Apparently 22 is the new 40.

[a700hitter]

He keeps using it as a troll tactic. Apparently 22 is the new 40.

and since 50 is the new 30, you are too old for me?

[ibot2much]

She is definitely not old. You must be mistaking her for someone else.

 

 

Do you know her? People can be anything they want to be on the internet and I have heard the "I"m 25" a couple of different times . Does that make it so? I haven't been here long so I am going by the quality of her posts and old and bitter is how she sounds.

[Dojji]

OK that's uncalled for. There's a difference between calling someone out in the hopes they fix the problem, and just plain antagonizing Emmz. Going after her age puts you on the other side of the line, that's a very sensitive subject for women, and I refuse to believe you don't know that.

 

So back off, thanks.

[ibot2much]

No it is not. You put your age out there repeatedly it is open for discussion. How many others need to tell us how old they are? I am supposed to care that this would "antagonize her"....maybe if she is lying it would.

 

But thanks for your input.

[Emmz]

Do you know her? People can be anything they want to be on the internet and I have heard the "I"m 25" a couple of different times . Does that make it so? I haven't been here long so I am going by the quality of her posts and old and bitter is how she sounds.

 

You follow me around the forums and snipe. Thats the epitome of bitter behavior. I'm going to go off of that and conclude you're a 47 year old virgin who lives in his own filth, sitting in a lazyboy that is now formed to your ass, naked eating cheetos and hasn't washed his scrote out since he had a date with that one chick who broke his heart 300 pounds ago.

 

Rational then? You keep picturing me as a hag, I really could care less what a shallow loser who sucks so hard that he needs to make conclusions about others in order to slap his pud.

[Dojji]

No it is not. You put your age out there repeatedly it is open for discussion. How many others need to tell us how old they are? I am supposed to care that this would "antagonize her"....maybe if she is lying it would.

 

But thanks for your input.

 

Well, if you want to poke a hornet's nest, I'm not liable if you get stung.

 

Seriously, there's no need to be nasty. It doesn't accomplish anything meaningful and in large doses it can get you banned.

[Emmz]

No it is not. You put your age out there repeatedly it is open for discussion. How many others need to tell us how old they are? I am supposed to care that this would "antagonize her"....maybe if she is lying it would.

 

But thanks for your input.

 

I don't, if someone asks I tell them. I don't need to justify anything to you, and I have never attempted to justify myself to you. You're welcome to view me in any light you want.

[Emmz]

I'm 2 years old. How does it feel to get your feelings hurt by a 2 year old, ibot?

[MANNYHOF24]

Every stadium has drunk fans. Fenway's no different. I just don't know where people get 'great atmosphere' out of that' date=' or anything at Fenway.[/quote']

 

Exactly... Fenway used to have a great atmoshphere for every game. I went to 5 games last year and for at least 4 of them fans didn't really seem like they were into the game. When I used to go around 03-04 Fenway truly was a great atmosphere every time I went, not so much anymore. It's still pretty fun to watch a game there though.

[onlybereaved]

Not mad at all. You I just laugh at because you're trying so hard to troll. You're delusional.

 

Agreed. Obvious, Troll is obvious.

 

I have seen 12 year old kids on BF3 forum who are better trolls than this guy, and he's a try-hard troll at that. Leave the trolling to someone who knows how to do it, JE.

 

Here's a lesson on trolling....

 

Eat f***. :harhar:

[Dojji]

No one likes losing' date=' I get that. And subjective all the way through. They've probably involved you too.[/quote']

 

Before I nearly got banned they did.

 

But I guess some of us are more capable of learning than others.

[MANNYHOF24]

They have standards for rim heights. Missing the point in typical JE fashion.

 

Your missing the point... I agree that dimensions should be the same for all ballparks, within reason.

 

I.E. There should be a standard. Having the green monster is a huge advantage for the Red Sox, and a pretty big disadvantage for the opposing team.

 

Manny Ramirez was a great left fielder at Fenway, that should be proof enough.

[Emmz]

Your missing the point... I agree that dimensions should be the same for all ballparks, within reason.

 

I.E. There should be a standard. Having the green monster is a huge advantage for the Red Sox, and a pretty big disadvantage for the opposing team.

 

Manny Ramirez was a great left fielder at Fenway, that should be proof enough.

 

No, that's totally not the point. All parks being the same sounds boring as f***. There's no matchup strategy in that. I like seeing pitchers parks where a guy can pitch no-hitters, and hitters parks wgere you can see 10 homers or more. Who wants to see a bunch of relatively similar games being played? No more Coors effect, no more green monsters, just a bunch of similar looking stadiums that are temperature controlled in every sport.

 

No more snow at Lambeau Field and Soldier Field.

 

Where it doesn't apply is that the rim height change would f*** with a players mechanics when they shoot or dunk and would be generally undesireable result for fans as well, because it f***s with rhythm. A rational comparison is with the pitchers mound. Its an absolute must to have them all the same length, or it f***s with a hitters timing.

 

You missed the point on this one, not me.

[Emmz]

Before I nearly got banned they did.

 

But I guess some of us are more capable of learning than others.

 

No point discussing this with you, really. Not really any point discussing anything with you. You're really the only person aside from ibot who seems to take issue with me. I'm going to make a rare exception and put you and ibot on the ignore list. You're in company with Gom and Reck, fellas. Grats.

[Emmz]

Agreed. Obvious, Troll is obvious.

 

I have seen 12 year old kids on BF3 forum who are better trolls than this guy, and he's a try-hard troll at that. Leave the trolling to someone who knows how to do it, JE.

 

Here's a lesson on trolling....

 

Eat f***. :harhar:

 

Favorite new member.

[ibot2much]

You follow me around the forums and snipe. Thats the epitome of bitter behavior. I'm going to go off of that and conclude you're a 47 year old virgin who lives in his own filth, sitting in a lazyboy that is now formed to your ass, naked eating cheetos and hasn't washed his scrote out since he had a date with that one chick who broke his heart 300 pounds ago.

 

Rational then? You keep picturing me as a hag, I really could care less what a shallow loser who sucks so hard that he needs to make conclusions about others in order to slap his pud.

This says so much about you...your imagery is so sharp and detailed, one has to wonder why.:harhar: