Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

?  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yankees
      4
    • Marlins
      0
    • Rangers
      6
    • Blue Jays
      5
    • Cubs
      1
    • Mariners
      2
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
The winning bid for Japanese pitcher Yu Darvish will top the $51.1 million the Red Sox paid for the right to speak to Daisuke Matsuzaka, SI.com reported Saturday.

 

The amount is not known, nor the winning bidder.

 

Darvish's team, the Hokkaido Nippon Ham Fighters do not have to announce the winning bid until Tuesday at 5 p.m. EST.

 

Teams reported to have bid are the Yankees, Blue Jays, Cubs and Rangers, although SI.com says six teams have placed bids on the 25-year-old right-hander.

 

Reports have pegged the Blue Jays as the top bidder, but there has been no confirmation of bids or bidders for that matter.

Posted
I have a hard time seeing them making a deal here. Why pay more on Darvish than Cj Wilson and Cliff Lee were both worth? That would just plain moronic.
Posted
You have to figure if the Rangers were willing to post a 50 million + fee, they've got another 80 million or so behind it for his contract. Crazy money, for sure.
Posted
I have a hard time seeing them making a deal here. Why pay more on Darvish than Cj Wilson and Cliff Lee were both worth? That would just plain moronic.

 

First off, that's not how it would work.

 

He will not be worth (posting + contract) as much as Cliff Lee, but he will be worth more than CJ Wilson, and with good reason.

 

Even if he turns out to be a bust, he would seem to have several advantages over Wilson, including age, durability (has never had arm trouble), and due to those things, projectability.

 

Remember that only the actual contract without the posting fee counts against the luxury tax. If Darvish works out, and everyone seems to think he will, then they get an ace-caliber pitcher with minimal impact to the luxury tax.

 

Obviously, it could fail, but it actually seems like a wiser investment than a 33-year-old Wilson with a history of elbow problems who has only spent two years as a starter.

Posted
I have a hard time seeing them making a deal here. Why pay more on Darvish than Cj Wilson and Cliff Lee were both worth? That would just plain moronic.
It makes no sense to me either.
Posted
First off, that's not how it would work.

 

He will not be worth (posting + contract) as much as Cliff Lee, but he will be worth more than CJ Wilson, and with good reason.

 

Even if he turns out to be a bust, he would seem to have several advantages over Wilson, including age, durability (has never had arm trouble), and due to those things, projectability.

 

Remember that only the actual contract without the posting fee counts against the luxury tax. If Darvish works out, and everyone seems to think he will, then they get an ace-caliber pitcher with minimal impact to the luxury tax.

 

Obviously, it could fail, but it actually seems like a wiser investment than a 33-year-old Wilson with a history of elbow problems who has only spent two years as a starter.

 

The Rangers are currently spending about 60% of the luxury tax. I doubt they're particularly concerned with that. $120 million is a lot of money for a proven major league ace, nevermind a guy who has never pitched past AAAA.

 

Think for a second... which major league pitchers have actually gotten contracts that big? Sabathia, Santana, Lee, Zito. That's it.

Posted
I have a hard time seeing them making a deal here. Why pay more on Darvish than Cj Wilson and Cliff Lee were both worth? That would just plain moronic.

 

If I recall , the Rangers did offer Cliff Lee a lot of money, he just chose to sign in Philly.

I'm not sold on CJ wilson

Posted
The Rangers are currently spending about 60% of the luxury tax. I doubt they're particularly concerned with that. $120 million is a lot of money for a proven major league ace, nevermind a guy who has never pitched past AAAA.

 

Think for a second... which major league pitchers have actually gotten contracts that big? Sabathia, Santana, Lee, Zito. That's it.

 

Come back with the cap argument next year, after they lock up Napoli and Kinsler, have to deal with a Hamilton extension, and arbitration raises. That 5-7.5 cap relief will look golden.

 

Also, there's this: According to scouts (and they could be wrong) Darvish was the best available pitcher this year, as in, better than Wilson. What if the scouts are right and Darvish is the real deal? The Rangers certainly think he is, and they're a model organization. So we, as fans, shouldn't rush to judgement on the investment until we see what happens. Next thing you know, he's an excellent pitcher, and the doubters look like fools.

 

That said, i'm glad the Sox passed on him. There's no middle ground here: Ace or bust.

Posted
Come back with the cap argument next year, after they lock up Napoli and Kinsler, have to deal with a Hamilton extension, and arbitration raises. That 5-7.5 cap relief will look golden.

 

Also, there's this: According to scouts (and they could be wrong) Darvish was the best available pitcher this year, as in, better than Wilson. What if the scouts are right and Darvish is the real deal? The Rangers certainly think he is, and they're a model organization. So we, as fans, shouldn't rush to judgement on the investment until we see what happens. Next thing you know, he's an excellent pitcher, and the doubters look like fools.

 

That said, i'm glad the Sox passed on him. There's no middle ground here: Ace or bust.

 

I lived through the Dice-k fiasco, I think that is argument enough that this was a huge risk, even if Darvish is significantly more talented.

Posted
I lived through the Dice-k fiasco' date=' I think that is argument enough that this was a huge risk, even if Darvish is significantly more talented.[/quote']

 

Oh i know what you mean. However, think about it this way: Dice-K's failures in the US were more a combination of his own idiocy and the team's coaching futility than his stuff or talent.

 

By all accounts, Darvish is not only more talented, but more coachable and durable.

 

That's what the Rangers are banking on, and if they're right, they've hit the jackpot.

Posted
Oh i know what you mean. However, think about it this way: Dice-K's failures in the US were more a combination of his own idiocy and the team's coaching futility than his stuff or talent.

 

By all accounts, Darvish is not only more talented, but more coachable and durable.

 

That's what the Rangers are banking on, and if they're right, they've hit the jackpot.

 

The rumor I heard was 5/70, so we're talking about a 5 year 120 million dollar contract, meaning he'll make 24 million a year. At that price, even if he pitches like Roy Halladay, there isn't much wiggle room for him to be worth MORE than his contract. His first year is probably going to be okay--not great-- because he'll be adjusting to the significantly better hitters, the wear and tear, traveling, and 100 degree summer days, not to mention pitching an extra game every month. Atleast Dice-k's contract had the 6th year.

Posted
The rumor I heard was 5/70' date=' so we're talking about a 5 year 120 million dollar contract, meaning he'll make 24 million a year. At that price, even if he pitches like Roy Halladay, there isn't much wiggle room for him to be worth MORE than his contract. His first year is probably going to be okay--not great-- because he'll be adjusting to the significantly better hitters, the wear and tear, traveling, and 100 degree summer days. Atleast Dice-k's contract had the 6th year.[/quote']

 

It's just a rumor though. Let's wait until the contract is finalized before we pass judgement.

Posted
He's going to be stuck in the same situation as DiceK. He's not going to be welcomed back when the Fighters can get $51.7 million for letting him walk. And his dream is to go to the MLB. So effectively, he either takes a reduced deal or he returns to Japan in shame. Shame will drive this, and I think a 6yr $60 mil deal would be done. It's more than DiceK, but not by much.
Posted
The rumor I heard was 5/70' date=' so we're talking about a 5 year 120 million dollar contract, meaning he'll make 24 million a year. At that price, even if he pitches like Roy Halladay, there isn't much wiggle room for him to be worth MORE than his contract. His first year is probably going to be okay--not great-- because he'll be adjusting to the significantly better hitters, the wear and tear, traveling, and 100 degree summer days, not to mention pitching an extra game every month. Atleast Dice-k's contract had the 6th year.[/quote']

 

Well, the Rangers will pay $24mm/year. But he'll only make $14mm/year.

Posted

Apparently this guy has a 7 pitch repertoire, that's incredible. I wonder how good they all are.

 

This guy, well the Rangers really, f***ed the AL East -- now the #2 team [probably] is not guaranteed a wild card playoff berth like they've been used too for quite a while now.

 

I sure hope Bard turns out as a tremendous SP for our sake.

Posted
Apparently this guy has a 7 pitch repertoire, that's incredible. I wonder how good they all are.

 

This guy, well the Rangers really, f***ed the AL East -- now the #2 team [probably] is not guaranteed a wild card playoff berth like they've been used too for quite a while now.

 

I sure hope Bard turns out as a tremendous SP for our sake.

 

There will be a second wildcard next year.

Posted

Yeah, for a one game playoff.

 

The AL will be a beast of a league next year and moving forward. It will be fun to watch how Darvish matches up against ML hitters. Nolan Ryan puts a premium on velocity and durability, so there must be something of his valuation in the signing.

Posted
Yeah' date=' for a one game playoff.[/quote']

 

Sure, but how does having two powerhouse West teams affect the Red Sox's shot at the playoffs? I'd rather give Lester the ball against Weaver or Darvish than face either of those team's top three.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...