8/14 @ M's

[boston22407]

WIN!

Go Redsox!

[rlchange]

Won't be here for todays game . Can I get everyones approval of making tomorrows?

[SoxFanForsyth]

since we are going to win, no.

[rlchange]

since we are going to win' date=' no.[/quote']

 

[SoxFanForsyth]

f*** off

 

that makes sense. you do realize that when we win, the same person keeps making the gamethreads, right?

 

We need a rules thread badly.

[rlchange]

that makes sense. you do realize that when we win, the same person keeps making the gamethreads, right?

 

We need a rules thread badly.

 

Ok. Yes you should make one. :harhar:

 

Anyways Good luck redsox!

[RedSoxfanforlife305]

that makes sense. you do realize that when we win, the same person keeps making the gamethreads, right?

 

We need a rules thread badly.

 

YOTN a while back said something about why it wouldn't be a good idea. I don't remember what he said but I agree rules need to be made.

[SoxFanForsyth]

YOTN a while back said something about why it wouldn't be a good idea. I don't remember what he said but I agree rules need to be made.

 

I think he said that people wouldn't read it, which is fair enough, they probably wouldn't, but at least if this happened we could say "Go read the rules thread"

[BeepBeepYoureDumb]

http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/53/5391/1QVJG00Z/posters/dore-gustave-the-mariner-gazes-on-his-dead-companions-and-laments-the-curse-of-his-survival.jpg

 

win plz

[Emmz]

I think he said that people wouldn't read it' date=' which is fair enough, they probably wouldn't, but at least if this happened we could say "Go read the rules thread"[/quote']

 

Or you could just explain it, being that it takes less time, if anything, to explain this rule than to go get the link to the rules thread.

[SoxFanForsyth]

Or you could just explain it' date=' being that it takes less time, if anything, to explain this rule than to go get the link to the rules thread.[/quote']

 

Maybe for one time. But when it happens multiple times a week, it would be faster to just have a rules thread.

[example1]

There are rules here?

 

I know about the gamethread one and that we shouldn't become barbarians with no sense of common decency, but otherwise it seems pretty free for all. 6 years in and I haven't needed a rules thread. I agree with Emmz.

[Emmz]

@SFF

 

Not really, what other rules are there for game threads?

 

You just explain the one rule, and someone understands. If no one's reading it, and they probably won't, then there's not really a point when it takes less time to explain the single rule than to go to the rules thread, and either copypaste the URL or the rule. The only reason it would be a good idea is so you could say that there's no excuse for not knowing the rule or whatever, but that hardly makes sense because it doesn't really seem like something worth punishing, it's more like a mistake.

[AtWork]

http://prohibitionsend.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/beer_barbarian.jpg

[redsoxbeatz]

has a red sox player ever had a 30/30 season? Jacoby could do it.

[iortiz]

Well, I just waked up... damn! Sleep is a good thing, hehehe!, anyway....and for God's sake, Give Wake his damn 200th-W for once and for all, please....

[RedSoxfanforlife305]

Number 200 has been on hold for a while. Could of had it 3 starts ago.

[AtWork]

I think when people sign up for Talk Sox, they should be required to scroll through a terms of service and click a button saying that they agree. Then we could all be made into human centipads.

[BeepBeepYoureDumb]

WHY WON'T IT READ!!?!

[VA Sox Fan]

RED SOX (73-45)

Ellsbury CF

Pedroia, 2B

Gonzalez 1B

Youkilis 3B

Ortiz DH

Lowrie SS

Crawford LF

Saltalamacchia C

McDonald RF

 

Pitching: Tim Wakefield RHP (6-4, 4.92)

[VA Sox Fan]

MARINERS (51-67)

Suzuki RF

Gutierrez CF

Ackley 2B

Carp 1B

Pena DH,

Olivo C

Wells LF

WIlson SS

Seager 3B,

 

Pitching: LHP Charlie Furbush (2-4, 4.46)

[AtWork]

It's frustrating when you go through your rotation and you lose both games that your aces start. I'm not looking forward to watching Wakefield pitch again.

[iortiz]

I think when people sign up for Talk Sox' date=' they should be required to scroll through a terms of service and click a button saying that they agree. Then we could all be made into human centipads.[/quote']

 

Well, when you sign "standard" contracts/terms like a debit card, cable company, software license or any sort of agreement/program, they usually comes with 5 to 10 pages with extremely smalls letters and a lot legal terms that a common person doesn't even understand... I don't know you guys, but in my case I always sign those without read them, in the end, if a contract is leonine, at least here in Mexico, the Mexican laws always will protect you anyway, but my point is that those terms are never read or only by very few people IMO, and in the end the owners of this site have the right to warn or ban anyone they want if they are pleased to do it, so...IMO no terms are needed, hehehe:lol:

 

BTW.. there's a rules section here, fair enough for me...perhaps they might include the new-GT "terms" there, hehehe ... But there's not big deal at all, trust me!, so... just get fun guys!

[AtWork]

Well, when you sign "standard" contracts/terms like a debit card, cable company, software license or any sort of agreement/program, they usually comes with 5 to 10 pages with extremely smalls letters and a lot legal terms that a common person doesn't even understand... I don't know you guys, but in my case I always sign those without read them, in the end, if a contract is leonine, at least here in Mexico, the Mexican laws always will protect you anyway, but my point is that those terms are never read or only by very few people IMO, and in the end the owners of this site have the right to warn or ban anyone they want if they are pleased to do it, so...IMO no terms are needed, hehehe:lol:

 

BTW.. there's a rules section here, fair enough for me...perhaps they might include the new-GT "terms" there, hehehe ... But there's not big deal at all, trust me!, so... just get fun guys!

 

There's a rules section?

[RedSoxfanforlife305]

Well' date=' when you sign "standard" contracts/terms like a debit card, cable company, [b']software license or any sort of agreement/program, they usually comes with 5 to 10 pages with extremely smalls letters and a lot legal terms that a common person[/b] doesn't even understand... I don't know you guys, but in my case I always sign those without read them, in the end, if a contract is leonine, at least here in Mexico, the Mexican laws always will protect you anyway, but my point is that those terms are never read or only by very few people IMO, and in the end the owners of this site have the right to warn or ban anyone they want if they are pleased to do it, so...IMO no terms are needed, hehehe:lol:

 

BTW.. there's a rules section here, fair enough for me...perhaps they might include the new-GT "terms" there, hehehe ... But there's not big deal at all, trust me!, so... just get fun guys!

 

When I went to get my debit card they gave me like 10 pages worth of things to read. Good thing he gave me a brief overview of each page cause I was not going to read all of that LOL.

[boston22407]

WAKE FOR 200 LEGGOOOo!

[BeepBeepYoureDumb]

Some guy on NESN just asked Cafardo whether or not Wake was a HOFer if he hit 200 Wins. Said "200 is the mark of a HOF career to me" Cafardo shut it down and then said Wakes career would still live in "red sox infamy"

 

....

 

what a mess that network is.

[AtWork]

Some guy on NESN just asked Cafardo whether or not Wake was a HOFer if he hit 200 Wins. Said "200 is the mark of a HOF career to me" Cafardo shut it down and then said Wakes career would still live in "red sox infamy"

 

....

 

what a mess that network is.

 

 

Sometimes they're worse than YES.

[iortiz]

There's a rules section?

 

My bad, it is more like a guideline.

[RedSoxfanforlife305]

http://www.talksox.com/forum/rules.php