Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
No' date=' but you do meet the standards of RtT, adam123, castigs, and TW101. Right up their alley.[/quote']

 

And you DO realize, I do not care what you think about who I relate to on the forum. I'll speak my mind about what I think, and if you don't like it or don't agree with it, tough s***. Unless you actually want to speak about it, rather than just bitch at me because you can't satisfy your woman, then maybe you outta save your fingers from the keyboard.

Posted
And you DO realize' date=' I do not care what you think about who I relate to on the forum. I'll speak my mind about what I think, and if you don't like it or don't agree with it, tough s***. Unless you actually want to speak about it, rather than just bitch at me because you can't satisfy your woman, then maybe you outta save your fingers from the keyboard.[/quote']

 

I'll let this comment speak for itself.

 

BTW, do you think the Nationals will be calling up any additional pitchers from AAA?

Posted
I'll let this comment speak for itself.

Or in other words you mean you're just at lost for words because I pretty much summed up your life. You can't satisfy a woman so you come here and take out your disappointment on other people and the little things.

 

BTW, do you think the Nationals will be calling up any additional pitchers from AAA?

 

Wouldn't know, don't follow the Nats farm system.

Verified Member
Posted

Crespo, thats all I wanted man, I was wrong to compare those two. As I just looked at that I kinda startled myself in what I wrote.

 

I did already say that I was never a Cabrera guy, and you proved it there......I was wrong in comparing the two and kudos to you for pointing it out.

 

The reason I keep bringing up Renteria is because he was the one guy I actually wanted, REGARDLESS of his struggles in his only season here. May have I been wrong in hindsight, yes, most likely, but being a fan, especially of a team so popular....doesnt that just make for good conversation and debating?....isnt that the whole part of being a fan and talking to fellow fans about a team that you really enjoy watching?

 

Besides that posting of the BR numbers, I still maintain i have been pretty consistent.

Posted
Or in other words you mean you're just at lost for words because I pretty much summed up your life. You can't satisfy a woman so you come here and take out your disappointment on other people and the little things.

 

Yeah, that's it. Square peg, round hole. Why is surprising you think the two fit?

 

You fail at insults, almost as much as you fail at your attempts to speak intelligently. I mean, I know I've never lied on a forum to people I don't know.....

 

Wouldn't know, don't follow the Nats farm system.

 

Didn't you play AAA ball before?

Posted

 

You fail at insults, almost as much as you fail at your attempts to speak intelligently. I mean, I know I've never lied on a forum to people I don't know.....

 

Pot meets kettle I guess.

 

 

 

Didn't you play AAA ball before?

 

Nope, but don't you beat a dead horse a lot?

Posted
Pot meets kettle I guess.

 

Ran out of things to say? I GUESS ITZ BECUZ U DONT SATISFY UR WOMEN LOL

 

YOU MUST FEL REL BRAVE TALKIN SHITE BEHIND A MONOTER NO LIFE LOL

 

Nope, but don't you beat a dead horse a lot?

 

When it's needed. Liar.

 

http://media.tumblr.com/zcTqHiK8c8m7c7z9ppEfrRUz_400.jpg

Posted
Ran out of things to say? I GUESS ITZ BECUZ U DONT SATISFY UR WOMEN LOL

 

YOU MUST FEL REL BRAVE TALKIN SHITE BEHIND A MONOTER NO LIFE LOL

 

 

 

When it's needed. Liar.

 

http://media.tumblr.com/zcTqHiK8c8m7c7z9ppEfrRUz_400.jpg

 

I haven't lied about a damn thing. I never once said I played Triple-A ball.

 

Now I tell ya what, while you go run to the search button and try to prove me wrong over a fruitless internet arguement, I'm gonna go to bed, because to be honest you're really just not as cool as you'd like to think, and I don't care about what you have to say, considering it's the same thing time after time.

 

Good night.

Posted
I haven't lied about a damn thing. I never once said I played Triple-A ball.

 

Now I tell ya what, while you go run to the search button and try to prove me wrong over a fruitless internet arguement, I'm gonna go to bed, because to be honest you're really just not as cool as you'd like to think, and I don't care about what you have to say, considering it's the same thing time after time.

 

Good night.

 

OK, I will.

 

http://www.talksox.com/forum/introduce-yourself/8182-nola-believes.html

 

Liar.

Posted

 

I know I sorta become a hypocrite what with replying after stating I was leaving, but yeah, I know about that thread, never said I played. Said I was going to.

 

And, thanks for making my day by actually going back to that thread. And you can stop saying "Liar" that word doesn't hurt as much as you may think.

 

Now, I really need some sleep, big day tomorrow (OHHH TRIPLE-AAAAAAAA!!!)

 

Good night to you.

Posted

I just had a vision....It's a Saturday Night Live skit with the character Thumper being played by John Lovitz.

 

And there's "Thumper" saying:

 

"I'm gonna play in the....uhhh...the PCL, yeah the PCL....that's the ticket."

 

"uhhh, I didn't play in the PCL....cuz I ummmm....uhhhh..had a sprained ankle....and uhhhh....I have to get another physical.....so, hmmmm....I'm going to play for the Zephyrs...yeah the Zephyrs....that's the ticket"

Posted
I just had a vision....It's a Saturday Night Live skit with the character Thumper being played by John Lovitz.

 

And there's "Thumper" saying:

 

"I'm gonna play in the....uhhh...the PCL, yeah the PCL....that's the ticket."

 

"uhhh, I didn't play in the PCL....cuz I ummmm....uhhhh..had a sprained ankle....and uhhhh....I have to get another physical.....so, hmmmm....I'm going to play for the Zephyrs...yeah the Zephyrs....that's the ticket"

 

and he'll bring his wife....Morgan Fairchild...who he's seen naked

Posted
Said I was going to.

 

lie

verb, lied, ly·ing.

–noun

1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

3. an inaccurate or false statement.

4. the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers.

–verb (used without object)

5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.

6. to express what is false; convey a false impression.

–verb (used with object)

7. to bring about or affect by lying (often used reflexively): to lie oneself out of a difficulty; accustomed to lying his way out of difficulties.

 

Soooo...yeah.

Posted
I just think this is a classic example of wrong guy wrong team. Lets look at this logically. What was Theo thinking? Its easy to second guess now......but I mean, Cabrera was far superior offensively and defensively. As much as Renterria gets killed for his lone year here, he was a much better offensive player.....and at this point Lugo is on pace to shatter those 30 errors (10 in 33 games!). Alot of us did not like the move when he made it, but we thought maybe Theo knew something we didnt......but he didnt, and almost everyone knew this was a bad move from the get go.

 

I would much rather see a struggling Lowrie than Lugo, because I think Lowrie gives more defensively, and if he develops at all offensively, he has a chance to at least give what Lugo gave last year (.237, .294, .643), and that worked out well for us.

 

The player Lugo is today isn't the player who played for Tampa Bay. IOW, he's not the player that Theo thought he was getting. He's something like half the size for whatever reason. Gammons pointed out that because Lugo's legs aren't strong anymore he plays SS like "the guy who walks accross the ice in shoes before a hockey game". Hence all of the errors.

 

Gammons suggested that Lowrie might not be ready to handle SS on an every day basis in the big leagues yet either. The guy he suggested as a short-term replacement was Omar Vizquel. If Vizquel can't handle the job full-time, they could have him share it with Lowrie.

 

Though I am a patient guy and generally want veteran players to be fair given chances, I think its pretty clear that something needs to be done to bring another SS in and send Lugo packing. The Red Sox have a good team and with Vernon Wells out for an extended period, and the Yankees relying on a rotation of Pettite and Wang and prey for rain, the Sox will likely win the division.

 

But if you loose a game in the postseason because your SS didn't make a routine play you may not have a chance to recover. I would hate to see Lugo cost the Sox at a chance of back to back.

 

To me this is the biggest priority that needs to be addressed this summer. Bigger than getting a right handed relief pitcher or getting another starter.

Posted
Lowrie can handle the routine plays. His range is subpar for SS in the major leagues. But when your incumbent has good range, but flubs throws and routine plays on a regular basis, the net gain of starting Lowrie becomes apparent. If Lugo played to his last season's defensive standards, which were rather poor to begin with, then you might have a case to stick with him simply because he made most of the routine plays and a good amount of spectacular ones simply because of his range. But this yr, since he is on pace for 50+ errors, it might be a better defensive move to have Lowrie start. Not to mention the fact that Lowrie centers the ball more on a regular basis. I honestly think Lowrie ends up as a 3b or a 2b at the MLB level, and this debut only furthers his trade value. We'll see. With Pedroia locked in at 2b and Lowell locked in at 3rd, Lowrie may end up locking himself into SS by default, even though he really isnt a true SS.
Posted
Lowrie can handle the routine plays. His range is subpar for SS in the major leagues.

 

As I posted yesterday, Lowrie's range (RZR) in his short time at SS in 2008 would be AL-leading were he a regular.

 

Something interesting--if one looks at Lowrie's FRAA at SS, the best MiLB fielding stat I can access, it shows a big jump for Lowrie at Pawtucket:

 

[table] Level | Games | FRAA

A- | 40 | -3

A+ | 88 | -10

AA | 84 | -7

AAA | 31 | 8[/table]

 

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/LOWRIE19840417A.php

 

In A and AA, Lowrie cost his team a run every 10-11 games at shortstop. In AAA, he's saved his team a run every four games or so. That's a big difference.

 

Maybe that superb RZR isn't just a small-sample fluke. Maybe Lowrie's finally caught on to playing shortstop...after all, he played mostly second base for Stanford.

 

http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/stan/sports/m-basebl/auto_headshot/57319.jpeg

 

FWIW, he actually pitched some in high school. His pro career was his first time playing SS regularly.

 

But when your incumbent has good range, but flubs throws and routine plays on a regular basis, the net gain of starting Lowrie becomes apparent. If Lugo played to his last season's defensive standards, which were rather poor to begin with, then you might have a case to stick with him simply because he made most of the routine plays and a good amount of spectacular ones simply because of his range. But this yr, since he is on pace for 50+ errors, it might be a better defensive move to have Lowrie start. Not to mention the fact that Lowrie centers the ball more on a regular basis. I honestly think Lowrie ends up as a 3b or a 2b at the MLB level, and this debut only furthers his trade value. We'll see. With Pedroia locked in at 2b and Lowell locked in at 3rd, Lowrie may end up locking himself into SS by default, even though he really isnt a true SS.

 

Cal Ripken Jr. wasn't a "true shortstop" either, but he did excel at SS given a chance. I see Lowrie as potentially being a more-than-adequate defensive shortstop, and right now Lugo isn't.

Posted
As I posted yesterday, Lowrie's range (RZR) in his short time at SS in 2008 would be AL-leading were he a regular.

 

Something interesting--if one looks at Lowrie's FRAA at SS, the best MiLB fielding stat I can access, it shows a big jump for Lowrie at Pawtucket:

 

[table] Level | Games | FRAA

A- | 40 | -3

A+ | 88 | -10

AA | 84 | -7

AAA | 31 | 8[/table]

 

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/LOWRIE19840417A.php

 

In A and AA, Lowrie cost his team a run every 10-11 games at shortstop. In AAA, he's saved his team a run every four games or so. That's a big difference.

 

Maybe that superb RZR isn't just a small-sample fluke. Maybe Lowrie's finally caught on to playing shortstop...after all, he played mostly second base for Stanford.

 

http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/stan/sports/m-basebl/auto_headshot/57319.jpeg

 

FWIW, he actually pitched some in high school. His pro career was his first time playing SS regularly.

 

 

 

Cal Ripken Jr. wasn't a "true shortstop" either, but he did excel at SS given a chance. I see Lowrie as potentially being a more-than-adequate defensive shortstop, and right now Lugo isn't.

 

I'm not a big fan of BPs and other defensive stats the readings just don't seem to be as accuare as MGL. I often wonder how Dustin Pedroia can be ranked the best in the league when his range is pretty average.

 

I am a fan of MGLs UZR stuff. A lot of the guys that rank well with that are guys that when you see play actually look like good fielders when you see them play. In fact many of the defensive statistics that major league teams use are based off of MGL or use similar methodology.

 

The big difference between Lowrie and Ripken as far as I can see is that Ripken was big guy with a big arm. He could play deeper and increase his range. I'm not sure Lowrie can do that. There ARE certainly scouts that believe that Lowrie can play SS in the majors. Personally, I'd rather see his bat and glove get more work in Pawtuckett for the time being and bring in a veteran SS for 08 at least.

Posted
I am a fan of MGLs UZR stuff.

 

Great! It has its merits, IMO, same as RZR, PMR, SFR, or the DFTS from which we get FRAA. For Jed Lowrie I have FRAA, and I posted it.

 

But you prefer the results of UZR...So what's Lowrie's minor league UZR at each level? :)

 

I often wonder how Dustin Pedroia can be ranked the best in the league when his range is pretty average.

 

Who rated him best in the AL? BP had Aaron Hill higher, as one counterexample.

Posted
Interesting that Cora was activated and Lowrie was sent down. I'd assume the sox are trying to create a market for either Lugo or Cora. With the way that Lowell, Lugo and Cora have been banged up thus far, it is pretty easy to assume that the utility guy will be getting a significant amount of playing time. We'll see where they go.
Posted
Interesting that Cora was activated and Lowrie was sent down. I'd assume the sox are trying to create a market for either Lugo or Cora. With the way that Lowell' date=' Lugo and Cora have been banged up thus far, it is pretty easy to assume that the utility guy will be getting a significant amount of playing time. We'll see where they go.[/quote']

 

Or maybe they want Lowrie playing every day?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...