Dodgers beat the Red Sox

[Vinny]

yeah' date=' they are sucking something terrible. Well aside from being undefeated, they have looked pitiful.[/quote']

 

I always go with how players play in ST and not overall records per say.

[VA Sox Fan]

I always go with how players play in ST and not overall records per say.

 

That makes sense....per se

[Cityofchampions33]

This is the most idiotic thread I've ever seen started, A thread made by Dodger fans (that haven't posted in awhile) about how they came out victorious by one run in a split squad ST game.

[Vinny]

That makes sense....per se

 

Oh yeah my spelling sucks. I knew it didn't look right.

[Vinny]

This is the most idiotic thread I've ever seen started' date=' A thread made by Dodger fans (that haven't posted in awhile) about how they came out victorious by one run in a split squad ST game.[/quote']

 

It is a bit early, but you know how fanatical Dodger fans are. Just starved for baseball.

[jacksonianmarch]

It is a bit early' date=' but you know how fanatical Dodger fans are. Just starved for cock.[/quote']

 

fixed it for you.

[Vinny]

I'm a fag.

What did you say?

[VA Sox Fan]

It is a bit early' date=' but you know how fanatical Dodger fans are. Just starved for baseball.[/quote']

 

Personally, I don't know much about how Dodger fans "are." My only exposure, unfortunately, has been the trolls out here. That's a damn shame too, I'm sure.

[Rodney Harrison]

Personally' date=' I don't know much about how Dodger fans "are." My only exposure, unfortunately, has been the trolls out here. That's a damn shame too, I'm sure.[/quote']

How was the turnout for the LA/BOS series at Fenway in 2004? That was the first time ever that the Dodgers have played in Fenway.

[seabeachfred]

I'm not touching this thread with a ten foot pole.

[Gammons Red Sox lovefest]

Don't play dense. This has nothing to do with "talking baseball".

 

I absolutely want to talk baseball. You all are so quick to assume the worst.

[jacksonianmarch]

Hmmm, I wonder why? You follow a member over here from your shitbag forum. You berate him and start fights. And you wonder why we assume the worst. I hope you dodger fags catch your balls in a meat grinder.

[BSN07]

I don't think any Dodger fans miss Julio Lugo or JD Drew. Neither of them played particularly well for the Dodgers. Most Dodger fans were jumping for joy when Drew opted out.

 

Ya Lugo sucked, but you guys played him off the bench when he should have been playing everyday.

 

Ya Drew sucked, he only led your club in RBI's. You will miss him when Nomar and Kent go down with there yearly injuries and you have Furcal and Pierre on base and no one of any conswquence to hit them in.

[BSN07]

Well us Dodger fans believe that there are more to just putting up numbers that define if you've been playing well or not. Being a leader' date=' showing by example, playing 100% all the time, staying healthy, being clutch (especially in the playoffs), are all very important to us. It might have been to much to ask for, but he was being payed quite well for it.[/quote']

 

And Drew was the only one who didn't show up when you got swept?

[BSN07]

fixed it for you.

 

 

 

 

hahahahahahaha! I laughed at that for like 5 minutes!

[TheKilo]

How was the turnout for the LA/BOS series at Fenway in 2004? That was the first time ever that the Dodgers have played in Fenway.

 

I'm fairly sure the game was sold out...but that was in the middle of the consecutive sellout streaks for Boston I think.

 

Who is more responsible for the sellout then?

[a700hitter]

No one east of the Mississipi has cared about the Dodgers since 1957 when they left Brooklyn.

[jacksonianmarch]

No one east of the Mississipi has cared about the Dodgers since 1957 when they left Brooklyn.

 

Amen. Dodgers suck.

[SuperManny]

Amen. Dodgers suck.

 

What's sad about the Dodgers is that they are basically Red Sox West. They think that because they play in the NL that they can win some games by taking the cast offs from the 2004 Sox championship. Granted they can win with those cast offs because the NL is terrible. Good luck with Grady "Don't call me Forrest" Little at the helm. I see you guys going places

[Mr Crunchy]

grady little is the voice of slingblade

[chinese torture]

What's sad about the Dodgers is that they are basically Red Sox West. They think that because they play in the NL that they can win some games by taking the cast offs from the 2004 Sox championship. Granted they can win with those cast offs because the NL is terrible. Good luck with Grady "Don't call me Forrest" Little at the helm. I see you guys going places

 

How many Dodger cast-offs do the Sox have now. Start counting.

 

Red Sox west..........that's a laugher. How 'bout you win more than one WS in a billion years. Then we can talk about who's who.

 

The AL East consists of two teams who spend money and three laughable excuses for teams. Ya'll share a love-den with ESPN.

[Metropolitan Cowboy]

The AL East consists of two teams who spend money and three laughable excuses for teams. Ya'll share a love-den with ESPN.

 

 

All that spending and the Blue Jays still had a better year.

[CrespoBlows]

All that spending and the Blue Jays still had a better year.

 

Yeah, because the Blue Jays didn't make four major upgrades in 2006, costing about $150 million dollars. If the Red Sox didn't have an second half resembling "ER" then I guess the statement would have some validity.

[Mr Crunchy]

l.a is nice

the way the barbed wire glistens in compton reminds me of the sunrise

 

the dodgers have a nice team in the nl west

they would struggle to win 70 games in the al east however

 

are you douchebags serious??

[riverside sluggers]

How many Dodger cast-offs do the Sox have now. Start counting.

 

Red Sox west..........that's a laugher. How 'bout you win more than one WS in a billion years. Then we can talk about who's who.

 

Well the Sox have won 6 in 104 years

[Metropolitan Cowboy]

If the Red Sox didn't have an second half resembling "ER" then I guess the statement would have some validity.

 

 

 

And if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle. If Wilson would have just struck out you would have won it all in 86.

 

Granted the last Dodgers ring was in 88, and they did beat a very poor A's team that could have been rolled by any NL team that is over .500, but to say the Dodgers would only win 70 game in a division with Tampa Bay and Baltimore is a joke. btw, do any of you guys remember who the A's beat to get into the world series in 88? The team keeps slipping my mind.

[VA Sox Fan]

Granted the last Dodgers ring was in 88' date=' and they did beat a very poor A's team that could have been rolled by any NL team that is over .500, but to say the Dodgers would only win 70 game in a division with Tampa Bay and Baltimore is a joke. btw, do any of you guys remember who the A's beat to get into the world series in 88? The team keeps slipping my mind.[/quote']

 

1988? How timely!

[Metropolitan Cowboy]

Well the Sox have won 6 in 104 years

 

How many rings have the Sox won since women were given the right to vote?

[CrespoBlows]

And if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle. If Wilson would have just struck out you would have won it all in 86.

 

You're comparing the Red Sox to the Blue Jays. The Red Sox at the peak we're among the best teams in baseball, if not the best. All that spending, and they won 13 games in a row. If that team was playing it's best nine every night, you honestly believe the Blue Jays would perform better?

 

 

 

Granted the last Dodgers ring was in 88, and they did beat a very poor A's team that could have been rolled by any NL team that is over .500, but to say the Dodgers would only win 70 game in a division with Tampa Bay and Baltimore is a joke. btw, do any of you guys remember who the A's beat to get into the world series in 88? The team keeps slipping my mind.

 

To base someone's statement as everyone's is wrong. I don't believe the Dodgers would finish in fifth. Probably third. 86 wins.

[CrespoBlows]

How many rings have the Sox won since women were given the right to vote?

 

That's relevant, how?