Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I know objectivity isn't exactly a FOX trademark, but could these two be any farther up the yankees' butts?

I disagree, they have made many remarks about the Yankee payroll. The one thing that pissed me off was when McCarver made refrence to the minor leagues and how the Mets "Have better depth". Just because you have Lastings Millidge it doesnt mean you have better depth. Baseball America ranks the Mets 28th while the Yankees are ranked 17th. Who has better depth?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I disagree, they have made many remarks about the Yankee payroll. The one thing that pissed me off was when McCarver made refrence to the minor leagues and how the Mets "Have better depth" Just because you have Lastings Millidge it doesnt mean you have better depth. Baseball America ranks the Mets 28th while the Yankees are ranked 17th. Who has better depth?

Depends on context. If he's talking about better depth to cover problems this year, then he's right since their top talent is at a higher level. None of the Yankees top-10 have played above single A before this season.

Posted
Depends on context. If he's talking about better depth to cover problems this year, then he's right since their top talent is at a higher level. None of the Yankees top-10 have played above single A before this season.

 

Duncan did...

Posted
Depends on context. If he's talking about better depth to cover problems this year, then he's right since their top talent is at a higher level. None of the Yankees top-10 have played above single A before this season.

Well the Mets only have 2 prospects really. Its Millidge and Pelfrey. Pelfrey is in double A just like Philip Hughes. So really hes only basing the Mets having better depth on Millidge.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Well the Mets only have 2 prospects really. Its Millidge and Pelfrey. Pelfrey is in double A just like Philip Hughes. So really hes only basing the Mets having better depth based on Millidge.

I'm not trying to defend him because I think he's an idiot tool, but in that context he would be right. There was speculation that Pelfrey could be ready to come up if needed by this Sept. Milledge is better than Melky, Reese, Thompson, et al.

Posted
I'm not trying to defend him because I think he's an idiot tool, but in that context he would be right. There was speculation that Pelfrey could be ready to come up if needed by this Sept. Milledge is better than Melky, Reese, Thompson, et al.

If the Yankees wanted to they could bring up Hughes by SEPT. Hes a very polished RH and if you read many of the chats that BA has most of those guys feel Hughes is better then Pelfrey. If his point was that the Mets could get someone like Willis with Millidge and Pelfrey yes its true but he said that then took it to another level and said the Mets have better depth then the Yankess. I understand what your saying...that the points are linked. I viewed it as two seperate points with the depth point taking a shot at the Yankee farm system. When you look at it I would take about 4 yankees prospects over the next prospect after Pelfrey.

Posted
McCarver: What do you do with Rivera? Do you leave him in there or put in proctor?

 

Did they change the rules today, now pitchers who have been taken out can come back in?

f***ing Dumbass

Lmao I was thinking the same thing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...