Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 265
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Huge break for the Angels! Sheff and Crosby collide in the OF, really no one's fault there probably pretty hard to hear each other calling one another off because of the crowd noise, as already mentioned. But nevertheless, a big break, Angels now lead 3-2!! NOW ADD ONTO THE LEAD AND HOLD IT! GO ANGELS!
Posted
Yankees now proceed to have brutal AB's against a pitcher that was battling some wildness(Some due to the horrible HP UMP Joe West)

 

yeah sure blame it on the f***ing ump

Posted
yeah sure blame it on the f***ing ump

What the hell are you talking about? I just made a note that the HP UMP Joe West has been all over the place. I didnt say the Yankees were losing the game because of him. They are losing because they can play any defense.

Posted
Well, you made it sound like you were blaming him for some of the faults. He's been wild for the Angels batters too, one of the strike 3 calls to Garrett Anderson was ********, but I'm pretty sure you implied that into your original statement.
Posted
I actually think he has been fairly consistent. He's generous on the corners and low but isn't calling the highish strike.
Posted
Well, you made it sound like you were blaming him for some of the faults. He's been wild for the Angels batters too, one of the strike 3 calls to Garrett Anderson was ********, but I'm pretty sure you implied that into your original statement.

WOW READ WHAT I f***ING SAID!!: "Yankees now proceed to have brutal AB's against a pitcher that was battling some wildness(Some due to the horrible HP UMP Joe West)"

 

I said the some of the wildness on Santana's part was due to the umpire so I was blaming some Santana's trouble on the ump. It had nothing to due with the Yankees. Some of you guys cant read.

Posted
I actually think he has been fairly consistent. He's generous on the corners and low but isn't calling the highish strike.

Hes been generous but not consistant. If your consistant then I have no problem with the plate but hes been giving the corner then taking it away for both teams.

Posted
WOW READ WHAT I f***ING SAID!!: "Yankees now proceed to have brutal AB's against a pitcher that was battling some wildness(Some due to the horrible HP UMP Joe West)"

 

I said the some of the wildness on Santana's part was due to the umpire so I was blaming some Santana's trouble on the ump. It had nothing to due with the Yankees. Some of you guys cant read.

 

 

Oh, excuse me for connecting the wrong piece of the sentence with another piece. By the way, your sentence can also be interpreted as: some of your brutal AB's being blamed on Joe West. I can read perfectly, the wording was fine, but the sentence had two meanings. How am I giving an English lesson on Talksox. Gah.

Posted
Oh, excuse me for connecting the wrong piece of the sentence with another piece. By the way, your sentence can also be interpreted as: some of your brutal AB's being blamed on Joe West. I can read perfectly, the wording was fine, but the sentence had two meanings. How am I giving an English lesson on Talksox. Gah.

Excuse me for defending myself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...