Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

JoeBrady

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by JoeBrady

  1. might've ranked #12 in our system,... Priester was unlikely to have ever been given a shot. Hmmm, that does sound familiar.
  2. Sure, they are no sure things, but that's how you get players like that. Vientos had a 134 OPS+ in 2024, higher than Alonso. Tong was ranked #75, and had 162 Ks in 102 IPs in AA before getting promoted to AAA and then the pros. IMO, that would be a pure theft, lack of certainty not withstanding.
  3. It almost doesn't matter. We gave up someone that we had given up on, for a semi-failed prospect. Then traded that prospect, who might've ranked #12 in our system, for other prospects. Priester was unlikely to have ever been given a shot.
  4. I still agree 100%. We got Priester for Yorke, and after 48 IPs, traded him for a nice return. That's a slam dunk.
  5. I think that's the RS taking advantage of a strange set of circumstances. Booser cost us nothing, had a few good months, and we traded him for a decent prospect. Then traded Fajardo for a decent pro.
  6. The addition of Contreras makes the addition of Vientos less favorable, but that would still be a good trade for us. Just using Duran 2025, he is worth 10.7. Vientos projects as 1.9 fWAR * 4 is 7.6. Tong is maybe 2.5*6 is 15.
  7. I don't disagree. But there are some GMs that'll make bad deals knowing they won't be there at the end of the contract. Same as in real life, there is no reason to outbid those people.
  8. But that has nothing to do with reality. I raised the question about a week+ back about a $260M payroll. No one commented.
  9. 1-Absolutely positive that JH is not cheap. 2-Absolutely positive that JH knows, to the penny, the marginal revenue, marginal expense. He will weigh the chances of us making the playoffs, the WS, etc.,
  10. Some of these GMs are desperate and will overpay for anyone.
  11. It's not, and there is -0- doubt about it. Money counts. It's like someone's house. If you have unlimited income, then it makes no difference. If you have a cap, sometimes you have to maker a choice. -0- doubt about it.
  12. It's good for him. I'm not sure he'd even be getting many ST starts. He actually has a shot at the rotation now.
  13. The trade suggests that Casas is gone. My guess is that he'll need rehab in AAA. Once healthy, he should have trade value, and probably has trade value even with the injury.
  14. I understand that. You only look at BB card numbers, and only at two of the numbers on the back of the card. Some people think there is more to BB.
  15. I heard someone on MLB-R phrase it similarly. It's cherry-picking the numbers, but Alonso and Contreras have about the same fWAR over the past two seasons. You'll be slightly happier with Alonso over the next two seasons, but much happier with Contreras over the following 3 seasons. IMHO.
  16. I agree with the spending thing. It is his #2 superpower. That said, the marginal revenue/expense works differently. Philly added a million additional ticket sales. That extra $100M in revenue fuels the extra $100M in payroll. At Fenway, maybe you sell another $25M in tickets. IRT to the pitching, Mr. Walker says hello.
  17. They are well-run. But could've easily have lost to the Phillies, and probably should've lost to the Jays.
  18. Assuming the Phillies re-sign Realmuto, they will be in the $320-325M range. That extra $100M would sure come in handy.
  19. Busts = 11 Negatives = 4 Positives = 8 Too early or too close for the rest.
  20. Not all of those are "real" FAs by some RSN standards. Certainly Papi, Millar, Mueller, and Napoli were probably considered dumpster diving by some fans.
  21. And they averaged 88 wins between them.
  22. Seeing this from the WS perspective, they won't likely be competitive for two years. If the dude can't catch up with a FB, then they out from under the contract in two years, when their window opens. If he is the real deal, then they have him under arbitration for 4 more years. Unlike most FAs, where poor teams get ruined by bad signings, I think this is just the opposite. A playoff contender can't risk a starting spot, even if they can risk the money. A bad team can.
  23. But the point being is that insurance companies don't cover accidents (injuries in this case) that have already happened. It's possible that the RS have coverage for 2026, but they certainly couldn't get coverage for 2025.
  24. I'm surprised Cherington is still there. Skenes was an automatic 1/1, so they get no credit there. And their other drafts were weak.
×
×
  • Create New...