Old Red
-
Posts
17,641 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Old Red
-
And calling someone weird, and immature isn’t middle school?
-
Did he break a HR record?
-
Did he play for the Red Sox?
-
Yeah, the main point is I don’t call people names for having a different opinion, and not everyone on here can say that. Yes I’m guilty for stirring things up sometimes, but it doesn’t start out that way, but some go way overboard sometimes to try, and defend their opinion that it’s so easy to do. It’s good to have a balance, and not have everyone thinks the same way, because like I’ve said before this is such a small sample on here of what the Red Sox nation actually think, although not necessarily on the Ortiz subject.
-
What did he test positive for?
-
Try as long, and as hard as you want, but my opinion is not going to change much to the dismay of many on here.
-
That’s a head scratcher.
-
Of people on here, or are you sticking up for POP PEE. I don’t call someone names for having a different opinion.
-
You don’t think the users were ahead of the testers? I agree you have to assume everyone was doing it, and the only reason Ortiz name came up, because of just being voted in to the HOF. Like I said earlier I would rail on any Boston sports icon if I suspected they were juicing up.
-
Like I have said nothing has changed, and no opinions have been changed, and I’ll still stick with Shaugnessy on this name calling, or not.
-
Probably, because users in my opinion were way ahead of the testers, so if you are implying that anyone who didn’t test positive means they weren’t doing anything dirty would not mean that to be true to a certainly.Do you know different to a certainly?
-
That question has already been asked, and answered, and doesn’t change a thing.
-
That’s the point that NO ONE here knows what MLB tested for, and yet everyone has an opinion. Lots of comments have been made on here, but nothing has changed. Opinions haven’t been changed, and that’s the way it will be. I don’t try to change anyones opinion, and no one will change mine like it, or not.
-
You aren’t the judge, and jury on that, and neither am I. So what?
-
Concerning what aspect?
-
You didn’t answer the question about Ortiz being clean. That is the major question.
-
You honestly believe with roids running rampart through baseball at the time that Ortiz was 100% clean? I don’t think it would matter to you anyway, because Ortiz was such a big part of those championships. Would you defend him so much if he had done that in a Yankee uniform?
-
Neither do you, and I don’t think it would matter to everyone on here anyway. That is where I differ. Just an opinion.
-
Now the name calling. Standard procedure on here, and if my opinion doesn’t bother so much why keep commenting. Either way it doesn’t change my opinion, or anything else.
-
I’m just doing that for your eyes on here just to see the reaction. Do you think it worked? Hilarious. Once again just for a different opinion.
-
List them all.
-
Who said it was an unknown substance? The just didn’t say what it was. As for Ortiz you are jumping to conclusions that I don’t like him. Just because I don’t like what I suspect that he did does not mean I don’t like him. I would say the same thing if it was Brady, Orr, Bird, Bill Russell, Yaz, or Joe s*** The Rag Man. Regardless.
-
You guys are melting down, because you don’t like opinions that are different from yours. In your eyes POP PEE couldn’t possibly be like so many others at the time was on roids, and setting HR records in the process. Reminds me of little kids can’t believe the possibility that there is no Santa Claus. Hilarious. All over an opinion.
-
Did they say what he tested positive for? No they didn’t, so, because they didn’t you hang your hat on that. Good for you.
-
The point is there are NO facts.