I had a discussion or argument with a trusted baseball expert (works in MLB). I said why is there such a wide divide between how a SP is used and how relievers are abused in opposite. I said you got guys who are on limited pitch counts, pitch once every 5 or 6 days, and are paid high millions and long-term contracts. Then you have relievers who are routinely being used 4x in a week, maybe even warm up and don't come into a game another time and it's perfectly okay to do that and they are getting paid at best low millions, short-term contracts. He said, it's all about the investment. You pour money into the SP, you take care of his arm. As for the relievers, who cares if they get hurt or they get tired arms because they are replaceable. Well, I disagree. You have to start pushing SPs to go longer pitch counts--EROD had only gone past 115 pitches once in his career prior to London. He was rolling and in my opinion should have been allowed to finish the 6th inning. He faced one predictable lefty batter and was pulled. ********. Even if he reached 130 pitches to finish the inning it would have been 2 less outs for the over-taxed relief staff. This is the real problem with the Pen. Over-work. It's not that they are bad pitchers--Brasier, Walden, Barnes, Workman are actually pretty good (3 postseason experienced) and have been at times outstanding. They don't have a designated closer, or setup guys and too many are throwing a lot because we can't get SPs to go past 115 pitches--forget the pitches--go with innings. The innings work is what is important. Pedro throws 150 pitches in 03 playoff or whatever it was and then it's like some sort of "oh, well, see he was never going to be effective past 125 and that's why he should have been pulled" to "oh my, no way are we ever going to allow a guy to pitch past 100-115 pitches. Get the pen ready at 95." Whatever.