I know it's a tiny sample size, but if our first 9 games don't prove that Fldg% is as near as useless as a stat can be, then nothing will convince those who believe it's better than any defensive metric.
And, if "it's what I observed is all that matters" argument is pulled out, I will ask, what have you all observed over these 9 games?
Great D?
Good D?
Decent D?
Bad D?
Horrible D?
If anyone chooses one of the first 2, I'm going to suggest an eye exam.
If anyone chooses "decent", I'm going to disagree.
Can we all agree to just throw fldg% into the trash, once and for all?
(I expect it's impossible to get 100% consensus on anything, but WTH!)