Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    129

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. In my opinion, many GMs would love to have JBJ on their team, even at $6.1M, and would give up something significant to get him... despite all his slumps.
  2. I know I've said it before, but do you really think a GM who has liked JBJ for years will no longer want him based on 1 month of poor hitting of which only 6 games are at the ML level?
  3. Every winter, reports are published reporting interest in JBJ. Here's a couple links... (The first one speaks of 6 GMs asking about JBJ) http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/clubhouse_insider/2016/07/scott_boras_i_had_6_different_gms_calling_me_about_jackie http://www.masslive.com/redsox/index.ssf/2018/02/boston_red_sox_trade_rumors_ja_4.html
  4. I don't think JBJ's 2019 contract will be higher than his value to the team. To me, the choice will likely be between Pom and Kimbrel. Who stays- who goes?
  5. No doubt, but GMs keep calling DD and asking about JBJ, so they must like the net value.
  6. My point was that he had not earned a FT role before the season started. He's doing a good job earning it in this small sample size start of the season.
  7. Devers and Beni can and IMO will become potent middle order bats. HRam will be batting 5th or 6th by September.
  8. Thanks, kimmi. Good stuff!
  9. Now, if we can just win in men's football and basketball, I'd be thrilled!
  10. Yes, and when the team won with "Morgan magic," which was actually based on hocus pocus, fans loved the guy. That turned on a dime, when things went badly.
  11. One reason why it's hard to automatically discount our success, when we don't really know for sure how good or bad the FLA teams really are.
  12. There's probably not any step raise percentages in writing, but I think the arb costs are predictable. I'm pretty sure a 2nd year arb with a 4 year arb player is generally less cost than a 2nd year with a 3 year arb player- right or wrong. The 4th year arb player might make more in his 4th year than an equal player in the 3rd year of a 3 year arb situation. We may trade or release some of our players up for arbs over the next few years, but we are going to be swamped with arb raises starting next winter. 208-2019 Winter (Current cost) 2 of 3 Betts ($10.5M) 3 of 3 Bogey ($7.1M) 3 of 4 JBJ ($6.1M) 2 of 3 ERod ($2.4M) 2 of 3 Wright ($1.1M) 2 of 3 Smith ($850K) 1 of 3 Barnes ($605K) 1 of 3 Hembree ($582K) 1 of 4 Swihart ($564K) 2 of 3 Workman ($min) Bubble: 3 of 3 Holt ($2.2M) 3 of 4 Leon ($2M) 1 0f 3 Elias ($min) It's kind of a messed up system, but it does allow players to make more before they reach free agency.
  13. Yes and Lakins, too.
  14. We really need fresh infusions like Poyner's. It's nice being 6-1, especially when you consider our full team is still not assembled on the active 25 man roster right now. Yes, we'll be facing tougher competition, but we'll have some vets joining us over the next few days, weeks and months... ERod & Pom Wright, Maddox & Thornburg Pedey & Hernandez AAA depth of Workman, Scott, Elias, Haley, Travis, Lin & others
  15. Last year we started off 3-3 with 2 games vs Pitt and 4 vs DET. We won the division. In 2016, we started off 3-4 (2 vs CLE, 3 vs TOR and 2 vs BAL). We won the division. In our championship 2013 season, we started 5-4 (NYY, TOR, BAL) Our 2007 championship season started out at 2-3 and 4-4 (KC & TEX) 2004 started out with a 2 and 3 start (BAL & TOR) and 6-5. I like being 6-1 with a bunch of tougher teams coming up at some point than being 3-4 with easier teams to play going forwatd.
  16. Arb contracts also have a lot to do with what arb year it is. It's hard to compare the Betts arb with JBJ, because Betts' $10.5M was year one of 3 arbs. JBJ's $6.1M was in year 2 of 4 arbs. I hope we can keep both of these guys. Having great defense in CF and RF in Fenways is a huge plus. I do get the point about redundancy and the idea of trying to keep JMart happy by getting him more OF time, so I could see us trading JBJ to either save $8-10M next year or find a SP'er to take Pom's place or closer to take Kimbrel's place.
  17. Those are usually the ones that beat us!
  18. So, what's it going to say about Yankee pitching when we bust out on you guys?
  19. Suppose someone like Swihart becomes the fourth outfielder with JD starting in left. Johnson takes over the fifth rotation spot. If we trade JBJ for pitching or prospects, I think Nunez plays LF more than Swihart.
  20. I could see us trading JBJ next winter, and maybe he'd be part of a package for a better starter than a number 4 type. I may be biased, but I think he's worth a solid #3 straight up. It always seems like GMs ask about JBJ. Maybe they just figure we're not dealing Betts or Beni. I do think GMs value JBJ's defense more than some here might think.
  21. I seriously doubt any GM adds or subtracts value from any player based on a 7 game sample size.
  22. The rays almost always do better than most expect.
  23. I'm not "celebrating." but I'm glad we're off to a good start and out pitchers look very good. An 0.86 ERA in 7 games is pretty good no matter who you're facing. Sure, I'm not expecting 0.86 vs the Yanks and Astros, but I doubt their starters go 0.86 vs the Rays and Marlins..
  24. Sox OPS .989 Bogey .952 Betts .816 HRam .757 Devers .666 Nunez .656 JMart .650 Swihart .541 Beni .534 Vaz .467 JBJ .400 Leon .375 Holt .100 Moreland
  25. Starter Numbers: 0 ER 14 IP 7 H 3 BB Price (0.00 ERA/ 0.714 WHIP) 1 ER 11 IP 6 H 3 BB Sale (0.82 ERA/0.818 WHIP) 1 ER 6.0IP 6 H 1 BB Johnson (1.50/ 1.333) 1 ER 5.2IP 5 H 1 BB Velazquez (1.59/ 1.059) 1 ER 5.1IP 6 H 1 BB Porcello (1.69/ 1.313) Not one starter with an ERA over 1.70! (Yes, small sample size but still meaningful.) Team starter ERA 0.86 WHIP 0.929
×
×
  • Create New...