moonslav59

Many felt the years and dollars were lower than expected to begin with, so I doubt a ho-hum 18 game start to 2019 cuts his value by 67%.

Hell, put Chavis out there when Moreland comes back. Even letting Nunez stand out there like a statue would be worth adding Syndegaard.

Our pen has trickled down!

Weber 7 IP 1 ER 1 H 3 BB 3 K Lakins 0 IP 3 ER Kelley 2 IP 1 ER (BS) Castillo 2-4 w 9th HR (.738 OPS) Travis 2-4 w 6th HR Duran & Chatham 0-4 Dalbec 1-2 BB Kent 7 IP 1 ER Brannen 2-5 Casas 1-4 w 3 rbi Granberg 2-5 Machamer 4 IP 0 ER Haworth 4 IP 1 ER

0-4 with a K. Hopefully, he gets into April form soon.

Exactly. There may only be a handful of teams that might trade for Porcello, assuming he regains form in his next 2-3 starts.

YES! And, people point to game times this year as not being higher than last year's, but we haven't hit September, yet, and this year's average will spike above last year's.

It's obvious, but that doesn't take away from the fact that our expensive and highly regarded starters have under performed, so far. I expect the starters will be fine going forward, even without Eovaldi joining the rotation. Our pen needs the most help, and Eovaldi is not going to be enough, even if he does great.

Yes, and our SP'ing has way under performed.

It does happen, but I agree, we won't get much of anything for Porcello, even if he has 3 good games before the deadline.

While the 4 guys I mentioned are getting paid more than Chapman, Miller, Beltran, McCann & Nova were, I think you are undervaluing their stock.

You really think Sale's stock has slipped that much? Have you seen what some pitchers with bigger health issues and spottier skill sets have been getting? You think Sale would only get $9M a year as a FA, right now? I'm hoping that was just hyperbole.

I'm not for a fire sale, at least right now, but in theory, we could trade JD, Sale, JBJ and Betts, if we know we are not going to outbid everyone for him after 2020. We could get a lot for that 2 or 3 from that group and still have a pretty decent core of players- some young and cheap to build around and try to get back to competitiveness after one reset year and maybe even a year where we get a top 10 draft pick by sucking in 2020.

Many seasons can be viewed in hindsight like you are looking now. Heck, some fans thought we had little chance last year, even after our great start and record breaking win season. I think this team is too good pack it all in, and trading everyone would not get us under the tax for this year, so you're talking about at least 1.5 years of giving up. To me, we could trade Porcello and Moreland and barely notice. We won't get squat for them, so I'm not sure how that helps us going forward. I guess we might get lucky with a prospect we get back, but I wouldn't count on it. If we look lethargic in late July, I'd think about trading JD, JBJ and maybe Sale, but I seriously doubt we look crappy in 3 weeks.

If we are going to have a fire sale, it would be with 2021 and beyond in mind. It would be to allow us to reset the tax this winter and the 2020 season and try to be back in the ring hunt mode by 2021. Why would we trade ERod, who is making half our bid 3 starters' salaries? He's under team control through 2021. We would trade all the free-agents-to be for nothing, if we could save money or get a single A prospect. That's Porcello, Moreland, Pearce, Nunez, and Holt. (Some are untradable.) The next guys we look at would be the ones that are FAs after 2020: JBJ, Wright & Workman... Betts (doubt we trade Mookie). Next, we may look to trade JD, Price or Sale, if we need to deal one to reset the tax, but all 3 could be hear until 2022 (Sale 2023), so they might be ones we keep for the next push. We'd keep Beni, Devers, Vaz and Chavis as long term, lower cost players for 2021 and beyond. I doubt we'd even consider trading ERod or Beni. I'm not on board with the fire sale idea, but that could change in a couple weeks. I think this team is too good to punt mid season. We've already spent way over the tax limit and have a team very close to the 2018 one that blew our minds. It's too good a team to blow up right now. It is showing signs of decline, but I'd wait to this winter or the next trade deadline to seriously consider a blow-up plan. This team is NOT the 2019 Celtics. We have no Kyries on this team. Back-to-back, BABY!

They are pretending. By the end of July, they will be selling. If they do buy, it won't be for an expensive rental.

All true, but it's not the only way to be competitive more years than not. The system has made it much harder for big spenders that win more than the lose every year, but spending large will always keep you contending or at least convincing your fans you can win each year. Having at least one "cliff year" is probably the best way to rebuild. Match that year up with a controlled firesale and budget reset, and I think we can get back to or near the top in 1-2 years. The issue, now is that we have a damn good roster right now, and it's hard to choose this summer as the year to sell and next winter as the reset time. My guess is we wait until 2020 and reset for the 2021 season. The next 3 weeks might change my mind to move things up a year. Trading big contracts this summer and winter, resetting in 2020 and then extending Betts for 2021 and beyond might work better.

Who have we signed, and who is the best guy still unsigned?

I actually said, "if he can stay healthy," and he was healthy enough last October.

Plus, dealing the only cost-controlled SP'er we have makes no sense.

I think Eovaldi has a good chance of being a top closer, if he can stay healthy. Being able to go 2 innings could be huge, too. I'd like to see us trade for a closer and use Eovaldi as Andrew Miller used to be used, but I'm fine with trying Eovaldi first and getting a 5th starter.

I don't disagree with anything here, perhaps a first! We need pen help. We have to ride our big 3-4 starters to the end. I will say, our record in Sale's starts should be 9-9 or 10-8 not 6-12. Like it or not, many of our losses have been Sale, ERod and even Price's fault. Here's a look starter by starter: Sale: 6-12 in his starts Runs allowed in 12 losses: 7, 1, 5 (4IP), 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4, 1, 5, 5 If you give him a win in the 1, 1 and 2 games we go 9-9 (Note: we also won one game he let up 4 runs in 5 IP). ERod: 13-5 in his starts: Runs allowed in losses: 6, 6, 6, 5, 2. Maybe we could be 14-4, but here are some run numbers in his wins: 4 in 4.2 IP, 5 in 6 IP and 5 in 6.1 IP, so maybe 12-6 is more likely. Price: 9-7 in his starts: Runs allowed in losses: 4, 4, 2, 3, 0 in 0.2 IP, 0, 1. We won the game he let up 6 ER in 1.1 IP. It's easy to see his record as maybe rightfully being 12-4 in his starts. With the "big 3" starting, we are 28-24 but could be maybe 33-19. Porcello has been a major problem, but he did have a nice 12 game run between his horrible start and horrible recent few starts. Porcello: 10-8 in his starts. Runs allowed in losses: 9, 7, 3 in 4 IP, 2, 5, 4, 5, 6 Maybe we could be 11-7 in his starts, but we also have wins with this: 5 in 6.2 IP and 6 in 5.2. More reasonably, we should be 9-9 in his starts. 38-32 with the BIG FOUR 5th Starter: 11-9 is shocking. While Porcello and our 5th starters are clearly weaknesses, right now, it's hard to blame our record on them. Going 21-17 with your 4-5 slot pitchers is every team's dream. Past performances are not predictors of future output, and I agree our pen and 5 slot starter are our top trade priority, but they are not the only reason we are so far behind the Yanks and on the outside looking in on the WC race right now. Our big 3 starters should have more wins- some because of blown saves, but also some because they have had sucky games too often.

Thanks. I thought Eovaldi was going to be ready sooner than the end of July. Johnson could be near ready, but I haven't seen him in any rehab games.

Yes, I agree, we need our big 4 starters to do well, or we have little chance of making a strong run at a ring this year. I'm not an expert on other teams' talent, but there are probably 28 teams with a better closer than us, and half will be sellers. We don't need a great closer. If we can improve our save% from 50% to 75% we'd be much better off. Plus, getting a closer would move our best RP'ers down a notch and remove the worst from the roster. If we can add Eovaldi to the mix in an Andrew Miller type role, we'd move the others down another notch and rop another one off the 25 man roster. We may even be able to go with a 7 man pen for a while. Chances are, we don't get a closer. We seemed locked in on the Eovaldi as closer idea and will probably find a 5th starter and move Velazquez or Johnson into the long relief role.

Updated Game by Game Pen vs Starter Numbers: Game 83: L 17-13 NYY: Porcello 6/0.1- Pen 11/8.2 (SP loss and -2/ Pen -2) Game 84: L 12-8 NYY: ERod 2/5.1- Pen 9/3.2 (RP loss and +2 SP/ Pen-2) Game 85: W 10-6 TOR: Price 2/6.0- Pen 4/3 (SP win and +2/ Pen -2) Game 86: L 6-3 TOR: Sale 5/5.2- Pen 1/2.1 (SP loss and -2/ Pen 0) Game 87: W 8-7 TOR: Velaz 3/2.1- Pen 4/6.2 (Pen win and -2/ SP -1) Game 88: W 9-6 DET: ERod 1/5.0- Pen 3/4 (SP win and +2/ Pen -2) Game 89: W 10-6 DET: Porce 6/5.2- Pen 0/3.1 (RP win and +2/SP -2) Game 90: W 6-3 DET: Price 1/5.0- Pen 2/4 (SP win and +2/Pen 0) By Wins and Losses Responsibility Game by Game (who did better in wins or worse in losses): Starters 19-24 (-5) Relievers 30-17 (+13) Scoring System (+2, +1, 0, -1, -2) SP +21 RP +38