Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    105,550

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    Yes, and he's gone next year, so we'll have more money freed up to make a solid run for Betts.
  2. moonslav59
    That's how I view it. I'd hate to see Myers in our OF. LF might be tolerable, but then moving Beni to CF would be cringeworthy. Imagine an OF or Myers, Beni and JBJ in RF.
  3. moonslav59
    Very encouraging after several down years in an area we used to excel at. 3 in the top 50 is very nice.
  4. moonslav59
    I'm surprised more than half the votes are for $350/10 or $375/12 or more. So far.
  5. moonslav59
    5.0 Sale seems encouraging, but the article says "I'd take the under." 3.3 ERod 3.0 Price (WOW!)
  6. moonslav59
    Price pretty much cancels out Betts, so unless we take back salary (Pollock & Kelly have negative value- Pederson has 1 year at plus value), I wouldn't expect much in return.
  7. moonslav59
    Sorta true, but I'd trade Price for Myers straight up. I'd probably trade Eovaldi for Pollock, too, assuming Betts or JBJ are traded. They are both owed about the same, but Pollock's AVV is $12M to Eovaldi's $17M.
  8. moonslav59
    With no Betts (and or JBJ), I'd rather have Pollock and his contract than Eovaldi and his contract. If we bring Betts back, Pollock plays CF.
  9. moonslav59
    Workman is a FA after 2020, and trading Betts is further punting the season away for the future. I'm just adding to the futute. Barnes has 2 years left and his stock dropped. Adding him was questionable but not illogical.
  10. moonslav59
    Betts, Eovaldi, Barnes, Workman' for Myers, Patino, Lucchesi, Weathers, Margot
  11. moonslav59
    Betts, Eovaldi, Barnes & Workman for Pollock, Kelly, May, Gonsolin & Cartaya
  12. moonslav59
    Yes, but why would we ask/demand he be part of the deal, especially if we have POllock as part of the deal. Adding Joc makes us nit get under the lux tax.
  13. moonslav59
    I'd rather hire him as our manager.
  14. moonslav59
    Joc is a glorified platoon player with one year of team control. If we ask for more, why a 1 year and done guy? This trade gives up on 2020, so Joc is useless.
  15. moonslav59
    Of course, they don't, but taking Eovaldi lessens what they have to give back, and Betts gives them like 6 OF'ers, so the contract swap of Eovaldi for Pollock makes sense to both teams.
  16. moonslav59
    Pollock has negative value.
  17. moonslav59
    Not saying I like this deal, but the site accepted this one, too: Betts, Barnes, Workman & Duran for May, Gonsolin & Cartaya
  18. moonslav59
    To me, this deal makes sense: Betts, Eovaldi & Workman for Pollock, Gonsolin, Stripling & Cartaya In reality, we may get this, at best: Betts for Gonsolin, Stripling & Cartaya (The trade simulator accepted both deals.)
  19. moonslav59
    Is there any evidence on twitch reflexes and age?
  20. moonslav59
    Choose $300M/12 or less as your vote.
  21. moonslav59
    Cast your vote.
  22. moonslav59
    I'd go $400M/12 to,lower the AVV.
  23. moonslav59
    Now that some numbers have been rumored, how much is the most you'd pay Mookie?
  24. moonslav59
    I've always thought we overpaid for this platoon 1Bman, but this seems about right. No need for Myers, now.
  25. moonslav59
    It's like Yogi said, "Nobody goes there anymore- it's too crowded."
×
×
  • Create New...