Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,889

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    I'm not claiming he will be great and never get hurt again. I'm just saying, he has already shown he can pitch well without his highest velocity. (Plus, I'm not so sure he can't regain most of his velocity.)
  2. moonslav59
    Money has to be the number one factor- by far. If two offers are very close, then other factors play a role. There are exceptions to this, of course, but it's about the money.
  3. moonslav59
    Had the Sox used up most of their winter spending budget on DJ, it would not have been "genius." We need pitching, pitching, pitching. Your needs are different. Your rotation is golden & rock solid.
  4. moonslav59
    Sale has already shown he can pitch very well without top velocity.
  5. moonslav59
    He can be great without throwing 96 mph.
  6. moonslav59
    I had Chatham high on my "next to be DFA'd" list, so maybe we get something good from Philly later on.
  7. moonslav59
    Sale put up some of his best numbers after returning from an injury and had diminished velocity. I'm not saying he is a lock to have a 7 WAR again, but he can get above 4 or 5. I guess this must also mean Severino is toast, too, right? Let's hear your projections for ... Montgomery German Garcia Severino King Be just as critical. Try it.
  8. moonslav59
    Agreed. If we sign Odorizzi to 3 years, it would be a better signing than Kluber. I'm also glad we did not outbid the Yanks for DJ.
  9. moonslav59
    I'm not arguing against this. The talk was about the rotation. I didn't change the subject: you did. (It's okay to change the subject, but it doesn't change the truth about our questionable rotations.)
  10. moonslav59
    Yes, you said "team" in response to his point about just the rotation.
  11. moonslav59
    I'm not sure who it will be, but we are going over the tax line, next year. Also, losing Pedey's contract and being 1 year away from losing Eovaldi's & JD should make spending large more manageable.
  12. moonslav59
    I do remember many posters going nutty about us not doing much that winter, too. Now, if winter comes and goes and all we have to show for it is Perez, Renfroe, Andriese and some other 5th starter type, then I'll be joining the choir front & center.
  13. moonslav59
    Looks like Lester to the Nats.
  14. moonslav59
    I think we paid just $21K in 1999. That does not mean we thought we stayed under, but we did cut it pretty close. Had we dumped some of our plaayers a few weeks early, we'd have reset in 1999- not that it would have made a world of difference.
  15. moonslav59
    Are all the valuable FAs and trade bait players taken, already? Can we at least wait until we see what our 2021 team will actually be before ripping Bloom a new one?
  16. moonslav59
    Well said.
  17. moonslav59
    We are gong to spend big, next winter. Book it. If the spending brings us guys like HRam & Pablo,maybe we won't compete in 2022, but it won't be because our rebuild plan is 4-5 years long.
  18. moonslav59
    I remember one year, I think the Sox felt like they got under the limit, but ended up over by a very small amount.
  19. moonslav59
    The rotation? About the same, in terms of question marks and what ifs.
  20. moonslav59
    I think it is including all salaries for the whole year.
  21. moonslav59
    Sad ending to a great career.
  22. moonslav59
    IP 2019-2020: 285 Cole 227 Perez 203 ERod 147 Sale 135 German 109 Pivetta 103 Eovaldi 46 Montgomery 37 Kluber 34 Garcia 12 Severino
  23. moonslav59
    Some prospect updates: http://news.soxprospects.com/2021/01/scouting-report-updates-jay-groome-aldo.html
  24. moonslav59
    In theory, we could sing Tanaka to $15M/1 and Odorizzi to $13M x 3 and still be just barely under the tax line. More likely, we might sign just one and use some budget space on a RP'er, CF'er and 2Bman- saving some for the dealine.
  25. moonslav59
    He is much more likely to pitch 200 good innings than Kluber, and for just $4M more, it seems like a good risk for a 1 year deal.
×
×
  • Create New...