Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I have high hopes for Seabold, Potts & Rosario, but my breakout candidate is Brayan Bello.
  2. They could shorten the season, again. No, I'm not talking lock out, but I suppose that could happen. Did the players gain anything in 2020? Did they lose anything? Did they have much say in what was lost in 2020? Can they learn from 2020 and try to mitigate further losses? Maybe not. How can it hurt to try?
  3. You are misunderstanding my point. The owners can decide to just shut down the season- like 2020. (I am not on the owners side, at all. Never have been.) The union should try to get whatever they can. Of course, I am not advocating they negotiate loses, but they are going to "lose" again in 2021, so why not try to get something good? If they can't, nothing is lost that they weren't going to lose anyway.
  4. An MLB article today says NY improved their rotation, but all I see is a "favorite" who replaced their #s 2, 3 and 4 starters with injured guys and hopefuls. Nothing guaranteed, there, either. When looking at who were the Yank's innings eaters and best SP'er over the last 2 seasons, Tanaka, Paxton and Happ are easily in the top 4 in both areas. IP 2019-2020 230 Tanaka 211 Happ 171 Paxton 143 German 107 CC Sabathia 103 Cessa fWAR 4.1 Tanaka 3.8 Paxton 2.0 German 1.9 Happ 1.5 Cole 0.4 CC You are right, nothing is guaranteed. Their rotation could get worse, especially if Sevvy does not return to form after returning mid season.
  5. They did seem to signal the specific things they did not like about the owner's proposal. To me, that shows they may be okay with some of what was put on the table. I'm not saying they will open it all up, but if indeed there were only a couple things they did not like- maybe it was more- then maybe some changes could be made that are needed to address this unique situation we are all in. I would not bet on it happening, but the players will end up losing again, this season- not that the wonder made out last year.
  6. If he were on the Yanks, you'd be singing an entirely different tune.
  7. Agreeing to negotiate some new terms does not mean the current deal is null and void. If no agreement is reached, things remain status quo. The problem is, status quo in a pandemic is nearly impossible. Some changes are real- like 2020. Do the players want management to decide everything on their own and then try to litigate it after the fact? I'm just saying the union should be proactive and not just let the owners decide on a lot of issues. If they see they are getting nowhere, then stop "negotiating" until next year. There are clearly some things the owners cannot do unilaterally, but some things could be traded off that help both sides and the game of baseball in trying times.
  8. I have to think there will be a few "bargain deals" out there in the next 2 weeks. Bloom is known for finding these types of players and deals. I agree, Bell, we are not done. We may not do anything major, but there is still room for that, but we could also do several modest moves that beef up our roster depth- both 26 and 40 man.
  9. Where did I say make concessions? I said make a counter offer. If MLB says no, then wait to the next negotiations. The world has changed, bigly. They better be ready for some big whining shows put on by the owners.
  10. Just 2 would be shocking, even if you added Schoop to the list.
  11. .687 in 1639 PAs from 2012-2016 .907 in 515 PAs in 2017 (The Cheat Year) .713 in 1214 PAs from 2018-2020 Reminds me of Marisnick... .607 from 2013-2016 (1038 PAs) .815 in 2017 (259)- The Chear Year .689 from 2018-2020 (553)
  12. I wonder how many meaningful FAs might end up having to sign for $1-2M for a 1 year deal at the last minute. We might possibly get someone like Moreland or Marisnick that way. It's hard to guess who gets left behind as table scraps, and if any gems will be hidden there.
  13. 10 x 15=150. I'll take the under on 7/day.
  14. Agreed. I think Rosario is pretty safe for another year, at least. I think Whitlock is someone to hold onto- big upside. That still leaves 8-12 players that could easily be replaced by an inexpensive last minute FA signing.
  15. No counter offer. You'd think they'd at least try.
  16. Utilityman Marwin Gonzalez is garnering interest from at least six teams, according to MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand (Twitter link). The Red Sox have been linked to Gonzalez in recent weeks and continue to be involved in his market, Feinsand writes, while NBC Sports Philadelphia’s Jim Salisbury (via Twitter) reports that the Phillies are also interested in Gonzalez’s services. -MLBTR
  17. Potts is not high on my list of replaceable players, but I could see there being 4-6 players available near the end that are all better than these 6-8 Sox players: Brice (out of options) Springs Payamps Wilson Walden Brewer Valdez Mazza We could maybe even improve on these players at a low cost: Brasier Andriese Chavis Arauz Whitlock (rule 5) Potts Rosario
  18. It looks like it would be a pretty good team and not all that costly beyond Bauer. Bauer Odorizzi Paxton T Walker Porcello Colome Rosenthal Greene Workman McHugh Kela Romo/Peacock Flowers/Mathis?Chirinos Moreland/T Frazier K Wong/Schoop J Turner A Russell Ozuna JBJ/ J Jay Pillar/Reddick
  19. On pins and needles about who goes to make room for Richards. (Not!)
  20. Some will end up signing minor league deals. Maybe a few get no deals or retire.
  21. I have to wonder what sort of great deals (for the teams) are going to be done, last minute. Maybe that is what Bloom is doing... waiting it out.
  22. Wow! That's like 2 weeks!
  23. It did seem like the accepted role for EHern was 2B with maybe a little time in CF, but the more I look at the defensive skillset of EHern and how having him play CF also improves the defense in LF and CF and maybe 2B, depending on who plays there, it makes sense to add a 2Bman not a CF'er. I'm not sure if Schoop will be cheaper than Pillar, but if they are close to equal, I'd take Schoop, easily.
  24. Well, EHern is better in CF than 2B and is a plus defender in CF.
  25. I don't think many Sox fans would tolerate his sub .675 OPS.
×
×
  • Create New...