I'm not sure the lead off slot is less important than the #3 or 6 slots. It has to help having a .370 to .380 guy up first over a .320 to .330 guy like Kike. That being said, over 600 PAs, .325 vs .375 is just 30 less times on base.
It's actually the 3 slot that has been over-rated by "traditionalists" not the #1 slot.
My point was that maybe the 2, 4, 5 and 6 slots should be filled by our top 4 hitters, and we only really have 4 clearly better hitters: Bogey, Devers, JD and Verdugo.
personally, and I think the metrics back me up, the 1 slot is more valuable than the 3 and 6 slots, so the best 4 hitters should be slotted somewhere in the 1, 2, 4 and 5 slots.
1. Verdugo
2. Bogey
3. ______ (Vaz?)
4. JD
5. Devers
6. _____ (Vaz?)
I'm not complaining about Cora's line-up, however. Putting Kike or Arroyo first, in a sense, lengthens the lineup by putting a top 4 hitter up 3rd or 6th not 1st. There is an advantage to that, despite the metrics showing the disadvantage outweighs the advantage.
I'm a huge Cora fan. I have some different opinions, but I don't see that as being critical of Cora. He knows what he's doing, and it's working.
I have complete confidence in our management team, and if things start going bad, I'm sure Cora will make adjustments, as needed.
Here's an example: maybe looking at Arroyo and his numbers, one could argue- "lead him off!" However, maybe Arroyo is doing so well, because Cora put him in a situation (lower slot) that did not have as much pressure on him, and allowed him to be so successful. Who are we to know better?
Now, if Kike keeps getting on base at .280-.333, and Arroyo gets on base at .350+, maybe we ease him into that slot. (He has batted there the two times Kike did not start and has a .300 OBP in those 10 PAs/ .250 career in 12 PAs.)