You think he likes playing sub .200 hitters?
It's all he has!
Renfroe was once a sub .200 hitter, but the only was we found out he wasn't was by playing him despite his hitting .200. (He was at .191 on May 2nd, and after his big game on May 3rd, he hit .143 the next 3 games, before finally getting on track.)
It's easy to look back and say, "Why did he play this guy," or "Why is he still playing this guy?"
The answer is that small sample sizes are not a reason to bench someone.
That being said, I'm glad Cora is sitting Dalbec more vs tough righties.
I'd like to see Arroyo play more than Marwin, but he just came off the IL, so maybe there is a health concern, there.
I don't like Kike leading off, either but moving Verdugo to the 1 slot just opens up the 2 slot- a slot the studies show is the most important slot. What do we do? Put Bogey, Renfroe or Devers there? That would "shorten" the line-up.
The big 4:
.316 JD (.955 OPS)
.314 Bogey (.919)
.292 Verdugo (.813)
.274 Devers (.927)
The meh's:
.258 Renfroe (.755)
.273 Arroyo (.702)
.234 Kike (.683)
.252 Vaz (.657)
The wtf's:
.174 Santana (.791)
.207 Dalbec (.646)
.190 Marwin (.554)
.179 Cardero (.501)
Without Dalbec playing, it's literally impossible to have a line-up without a sub .200 batter. If Arroyo can't play everyday, it has to be 2 batters.
We have to hope 1-2 of these weak hitters pull a Renfroe on us, but by then, maybe Renfroe is back in a slump.
Newsflash: other teams have much worse or plentiful blackholes in their line-ups, too. Even teams with better records than ours.