Jump to content
The MLB Draft starts on Saturday at 1pm Eastern. Check out our mock draft board in the lead-up to the picks! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    105,265

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    134

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    The best pop time in ML history won't matter much, if the runners are already on 2nd base when the throw is half way to 2nd.
  2. moonslav59
    It was just a hypothetical. It's not like management can choose an option and build teams accordingly to guarantee a ring every 3-5 year, 8-12 or 13-20. It's impossible, but my choices were from the fan's perspective, what would you prefer. There are certain management strategies that can involve "tanking" a year or two, here and there, and focusing on timing upswings that maximize the recourses for shorter windows and, in theory, increases the odds for more ring years, at the expense of more down years, but that is a slippery slope. I like the strategy we have applied. Some of our "down years" were not really planned, and 2013 was not really an "all-in" ring year, either, but 4 rings is heaven, to me. The last place seasons sucked, but I'd much rather have that than what we had pre-Henry.
  3. moonslav59
    Nobody ever does these types of trades, as they are struggling to cram their best players into 40 slots. They have to really like our players to take 2 for 1, since they must then chop one more guy off their list. BTW, what teams have the weakest 37-40th slots on this winter's roster? (One might place the Sox in the top 10 for slots 39-40.)
  4. moonslav59
    In theory, Beni > Arroyo, but had we played Kike at 2B FT, our OF D would have been much worse. I don't think we really missed Beni, but one can pull up Cordero, Santana and Marwin's numbers and argue otherwise. The money saved was also part of the trade, and we did get 5 guys for him. The jury is still out on them.
  5. moonslav59
    There may be a bidding war based on how valuable you say he is.
  6. moonslav59
    Framing may not matter anymore with robo umps. Pop time matters very little when your staff doesn't care to hold runners or pitch from the stretch.
  7. moonslav59
    When did I say $1.6M was a "steal?" I said it would be great to replace him with someone better. ' Catchers are not easy to find, especially good ones, but sure, let's upgrade.
  8. moonslav59
    I'd love that, especially if he is cheaper and a better defender and pitcher handler. I'd also like to have a better starting catcher.
  9. moonslav59
    I hear you, and s***** seasons suck, but as a fan that went through 3 plus decades of coming up short, I'd choose A from below: A) A ring every 3-5 years, some good years in between and maybe a last place or two every 4-6 years. A ring every 8-12 years, but good teams just about every year in between and maybe 1-2 last placed every 20 years. C) A ring every 13-20 years, competitive teams almost every year and no last place finishes in 20 years.
  10. moonslav59
    I know other teams have roster crunches coming up around rule 5 protection day, and every year I suggest we make a 2 for 1 deal or a protected player for a far away prospects not up for rule 5, this year, to create another slot, but it never happens. In theory, we trade 2 from Potts, Rosario and Jimenez for one "better" prospects. Other options might be to trade someone like JD and Rosario for a high-priced pitcher that offsets the financial balance, then sign Schwarber.
  11. moonslav59
    He's so far away from the bigs, he'd be a total stash on a 26 man roster and probably get very little playing and development time. I guess he could be one of those "hope he flies under the radar type players on rule 5 draft day. That would free up one slot more. Is it worth keeping Potts or Rosario vs maybe losing Jimenez?
  12. moonslav59
    Indeed, but we did pay Leon $1.3, $1.95 and $2.48M his last 3 years. Plawecki made $1.6M, this year.
  13. moonslav59
    We're at 86 wins with 11 to go. Chances are, we win 90-94 games! Only 2 posters projected that. (I projected "86 wins before any free agents are signed.")
  14. moonslav59
    I have never said Plawecki should play more than Vaz or even more than he plays now. I'm just pointing out the added value Plawecki brings as a back-up. CERA type value is not maddening. It makes perfect sense that some pitchers do better with one catcher over another. They even say it. Some have years and years of data to show their preferences. Some do about the same with anybody behind the plate. If you don't like CERA, how about COPS Against? LOL. Of the 9 pitchers with 50+ PAs with Vaz and Plawecki, 6 have a better OPS Against with Plawecki: Plawecki- Vaz Pitcher .651- .732 Eovaldi .660-.777 Pivetta .679-.607 Houck .674-.847 Richards 1.163-.781 Perez .640-.679 Taylor .765-.599 Ottavino .478-.745 DHern .596-.632 Valdez
  15. moonslav59
    He's 1/6 the cost of Vaz, has more years of team control and gets better results from the staff- pitcher by pitcher- than Vaz. So, you want us to pick up another back-up catcher with a better fWAR/gm than Vaz?
  16. moonslav59
    How many years in a row have they "underachieved?" I'm not saying they haven't, but there comes a point where you have to start thinking maybe the expectations were too high to begin with. Maybe they are who they are. I happen to think a better manager could get more from the same guys, but I also think Cashman has some serious roster construction ability flaws.
  17. moonslav59
    Why the need to replace Plawecki, who looks good on D, gets good results from the staff and can actually hit okay for a catcher? He's pretty cheap, too.
  18. moonslav59
    fWAR 11. Bogey 5.1 18. Devers 4.5 31. Moncada 4.0 35. Betts 3.9 48. Kike 3.5 68. JD 2.6 74. Verdugo 2.5 97. Renfroe 1.8 98. Beni 1.8 120. Iggy 0.9 3. Eovaldi 5.5 20. Montas 3.8 31. ERod 3.2 39. Miley 2.9 64. Kimbrel 2.2 77. Houck 1.9 83. Pivetta 1.7 92. R Hill 1.6 101. Whitlock 1.5 110. Barnes 1.4 122. Kopech 1.3 140. Richards 1.1 143. Ottavino 1.1 165. Taylor 1.0 182. Price 0.8 218. Perez 0.6 226. Kelly 0.6
  19. moonslav59
    93-58 TBR 89-61 HOU 86-65 BOS WC1 85-65 CWS 84-66 TOR WC2 (-1.5 WC1) 84-67 NYY -0.5 WC2 82-68 OAK -2.0 81-69 SEA -3.0 SEA 0r OAK needs to basically sweep the other to have a chance. The Yanks have a very tough last 9 games. TOR has a tougher schedule than BOS. One game at a time, Boys. Beat the Mets, tonight.
  20. moonslav59
    I kinda like Plawecki, but with Vaz a free agent after 2022, maybe they keep 4 catchers on the 40 (Vaz, Plawecki, Wong & R Hernandez.) Maybe they identify the one they want the least and deal him. Hard to know. With Dalbec playing so well, maybe Casas gets a full year at AAA, and his clock is delayed. Winckowski seems like he'll get a shot, but who knows what kind of starter depth Bloom will add, this winter. Seabold is ahead, and maybe Bello gets a shot before JW.
  21. moonslav59
    We passed the CWS to become the 3rd best team, by record, in the AL, and 3 down from HOU.
  22. moonslav59
    Whitlock & Winckowski, too.
  23. moonslav59
    Taking 2 from the Mets, while our contenders bash each other up really would position us nicely going into the series of the season v the Yanks.
  24. moonslav59
    Just a few... Luis Patino (for Snell) Nick Anderson & Trevor Richards (for Stanek & Sanchez) Baz, Glasnow & Meadows (for Chris Archer)
  25. moonslav59
    Most assume they draft great, and they do okay, but yes, many are picked from other farm systems.
×
×
  • Create New...