Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,743

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    Yanks tied it on 3 walks and a WP.
  2. moonslav59
    Indeed. I’d rather have Schwarber than JD, but JD is no slouch. The big improvement by Dalbec as well as Verdugo looking more solid and Renfroe putting together a few solid months, does make keeping JD and Schwarber a bit redundant while taking funds away from improving the staff.
  3. moonslav59
    I trust B-R.
  4. moonslav59
    I checked the 2018 baseball reference page.
  5. moonslav59
    We did it in April of 2018.
  6. moonslav59
    BTW, the 3 guys Dalbec could have started instead of- Renfroe, JD or Schwarber are 4 for 4 with 2 HRs, a 2B and 5 RBI. Yes, Cora sucks! Lol
  7. moonslav59
    Schwarber was 3 for 8 with 3 HRs vs this starter. He deserved to start over Renfroe not Dalbec, IMO. Renfroe and Schwarber have both played well since the deadline, but I do not believe recent performance projects future performance. If we went by that theory, Dalbec would never have gotten a chance to get hot.
  8. moonslav59
    Here is Sale’s velo charts. You can change the years, if you wish... https://www.fangraphs.com/players/chris-sale/10603/graphs?pitchgraphs=true&statArr=&legend=1&split=base&time=daily&start=2018&end=2021&rtype=mult&gt1=15&dStatArray=FA&ymin=&ymax=
  9. moonslav59
    Again, I wanted Dalbec starting. Schwarber, too. You lost me at “Cora sucks.”
  10. moonslav59
    Yes, and he actually threw with higher velocity in 2018 than any other year. He hit high 90’s a lot that year but still averaged around 96-97.
  11. moonslav59
    It was more like 95-96. I think he’ll get back to that on a consistent basis by next year.
  12. moonslav59
    I think you missed the part where I said I’d play Dalbec- just not instead of JD. I’d have sat Renfroe vs this righty. JD is one of the best hitters in MLB. He can hit sliders. He’ll work through this mini slump. No way I bench JD. Dalbec should play everyday.
  13. moonslav59
    Wrong. I said I’d keep him for 2022, if he made $2M. The CERA is just one factor out of many, including his decline in offense, that makes him not worth $7M.
  14. moonslav59
    That’s a funny one!
  15. moonslav59
    I’m not sitting JD. I’d make it Dalbec v Renfroe v RHPs. We can now see why Schwarber is playing.
  16. moonslav59
    Sucks? Really? I'd have started Dalbec over Renfroe and had Verdugo in RF and Schwarber in LF, but it's not a no-brainer choice. BTW, Schwarber is 3 for 8 vs Walker with 3 HRs! (Renfroe 0-5 and Dalbec 0-2)
  17. moonslav59
    second half numbers: 2.40 C Sale 6 GS 30 IP 3.42 Houck 10 GS/50IP (2 as RP) 3.45 Eovaldi 12 GS/70 IP 3.76 Richards 4GS/ 41 IP (14 as RP) 4.11 E Rod 12 GS/57 IP 5.29 Pivetta 10 GS/ 48 IP 7.40 M Perez 4 GS/ 24 IP (11 as RP) ERod over last 15 GS: 3.87 and last 14 GS: 3.97
  18. moonslav59
    Huh? https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=ss&stats=fld&lg=all&qual=y&type=1&season=2021&month=0&season1=2015&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=&enddate= 20 qualifying SSs: Lindor is second. Bogey is 10th. UZR/150 Lindor 2nd Bogey 11th DRS Lindor 6th Bogey Last (20th out of 20) Expand the list to 2500+ Innings since 2015: (34 qualify) UZR/150 2. Lindor 19. Bogey DRS: 8. Lindor 34. Bogey (last) Want more recent? 2019-2021 (100+ innings and 35 qualified) UZR/150 4. lindor 17. Bogey DRS 8. Lindor 31. Bogey (5th from worst- BTW, right ahead of Iggy) In 2021, alone, Bogey is ahead 2.1 to 2.0 in UZR/150 but is 9 runs behind in DRS.
  19. moonslav59
    Nobody is arguing CERA is more than 50% of the reason to start one catcher over another. I'm the main guy arguing its value, and I have never said Plawecki should start or even play more than he is, now. You guys keep acting like I am arguing for Vaz to be benched over CERA.
  20. moonslav59
    I've posted the data several times. It's up to you to determine where the sample size minimum needs to be to make the comp have merit. Over the years, I have posted, pitcher by pitcher, year by year and also career numbers pitcher by pitcher. The evidence is not only clear, it is overwhelmingly clear. The disparities are consistent and significant in most cases. We can argue about randomness and other variables being in play, but the facts are clear: most pitchers with large sample sizes with 2 or more Sox catcher do way better with the catcher not names Vaz.
  21. moonslav59
    It's how people get signed. It's based on what you did and what you are expected to do. True, you don't technically "earn" it until you start playing under the new deal and show whether you earned it or not. Also, since many of these high-price players were technically underpaid before they get the new deal, one can argue they earned some of it.
  22. moonslav59
    I didn't count 2021, because he signed the deal before that. I didn't count 2020 because it was 2020. I can see thinking those numbers should count, though- proportionally.
  23. moonslav59
    It's the just one year part that makes it a possibility. I doubt any Sox fan would be fore a $19M x 5 year deal.
  24. moonslav59
    The differences are consistent. year to year. pitcher by pitcher. 75-80% of pitchers do better with the other catcher. You can choose to not believe it, but I have provided all the data. It takes two to argue, so as soon as you stop saying it makes zero difference, the debate ends.
  25. moonslav59
    I know I do, but it's funny how he calls people who respond "nutjobs," when he leads the league doing that, okay maybe he's second to me, is a bit ironic.
×
×
  • Create New...