Jump to content
Can the Red Sox offense take advantage of a struggling Luzardo and Phillies team? Join our game thread! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,678

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    But you were critical we went with him for more than one inning, yesterday.
  2. moonslav59
    Still, 5 IP+ and 1 ER beats the hell out of 5 IP and 3 ERs.
  3. moonslav59
    Our pen was supposed to suck, last year, too, and we used 33 pitchers. This year, we have more "long guys," so I'm sticking with the under. This 28 man roster may create more chances in April, though.
  4. moonslav59
    Yes, and how many runs would Eovaldi have given up had he started every inning with a man on 2nd?
  5. moonslav59
    Santana was not paid much. Marwin just 3 yrs/1. Those deals don't baffle me as much as 2 x $4M. On Marwin, what baffled me was how long Cora stuck with him. There was a time in May or June where he was still something like 7th or 8th in PAs on the team!
  6. moonslav59
    I'll take the under on 35- not counting everyday players doing mop-up duty here and there.
  7. moonslav59
    Not really. Nate gave up 2 HRs and did worse than the pen. Not by much, but he did.
  8. moonslav59
    No doubt, but if blame has to be given- not that it has to be given- to one aspect of our pitching in game 1: starter vs pen, it was more Eovaldi's fault we lost.
  9. moonslav59
    Nick the Stopper.
  10. moonslav59
    That's more than Sawamura and others. It's a better deal than Hill got. It's total more money than Wacha. Until the Story deal, it was the biggest 2 year deal after Kike.
  11. moonslav59
    I was baffled on day one. There is nothing spectacular about him or even really anything clearly positive about his career, except a decent year here and there- mostly long ago.
  12. moonslav59
    Okay, but you wrote he got "mauled" after letting up one run in a shaky 1+ innings.
  13. moonslav59
    Portland won 11-5. Hamilton 4 for 5 with 7 RBI from the lead-off slot. (2 HRs and a triple) Maybe Bloom was right! JBJ who? Koss, Reed and Cottam with 2 hits, each. Potts with 2 BB and 2 runs scored Murphy 4 IP, 1 ER (2H, 3 BB, 7K)
  14. moonslav59
    Portland won 11-5. Hamilton 4 for 5 with 7 RBI from the lead-off slot. (2 HRs and a triple) Koss, Reed and Cottam with 2 hits, each. Potts with 2 BB and 2 runs scored Murphy 4 IP, 1 ER (2H, 3 BB, 7K)
  15. moonslav59
    Mauled? 4 IP 3 H 1 BB 1 ER 3 Ks Franchy has a granny, and Casas is now 2 for 2
  16. moonslav59
    The damn man on second to start the inning rule makes it very hard to judge the effectiveness of an extra inning RP'er's outing. They don't count it as an earned run, but it kinda feels like one. Officially, today our starter and pen did this: SP: 5 IP 3 ER 5 Hits & 1 BB & 1 HBP & 2 HR RP: 6 IP 1 ER (plus the 2 " non earned" runs allowed in extras.) 5 hits & 3 BB & 1 HBP & 1 HR Just looking at the numbers, the pen did slightly better than Eovaldi.
  17. moonslav59
    When we signed him, I was wondering why this guy got the 2 year deal- something quite rare with Bloom.
  18. moonslav59
    Oh, well. The day started out nicely.
  19. moonslav59
    Should we call him Geekman, Meekman, Pokemon or Tweekman?
  20. moonslav59
    and maybe a DP opportunity with Higgy up.
  21. moonslav59
    Brasier to the rescue!
  22. moonslav59
    man on first is meaningless as a run scorer. Now, there is a force at home.
  23. moonslav59
    Scary time
  24. moonslav59
    No faith in Barnes, I guess.
  25. moonslav59
    JD swinging at obvious balls.
×
×
  • Create New...