Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. It's all about results, right? If you think Mayer is all Bloom has done to the farm, you've missed quite a bit. The jury is still out on just how good Bloom's farm is and will be. Many of the incoming prospects were there before he got here. Nobody is saying he has built the farm up to greatness. It's all speculative. On paper, it appears he's done what he was asked to do, and quicker, stronger and faster than I thought possible under the tightened rules that penalize winning teams and big spending teams. BTW, other prospects Bloom has added beyond Mayer: Whitlock- quite an omission and not someone every GM would have taken. (BTW, 3 teams passed on Mayer, so your "anyone" terminology if off a bit.) Bleis- may turn out to be the best since Devers or Betts & Bogey. Yorke Romero & Anthony (with Mayer, that's 5 in the top 10 after just 3 seasons) , Wallace Kelly & German Wong E Valdez & Abreu Jordan Hickey Coffey Kavadas Rodrigues-Cruz Ferguson & Rosier D Hamilton, Binelas, Koss & RHern and a few with fading hopes, if any, like Seabold, Downs & Ort. Sure, many of these will not make it, but you seem like you think only Mayer is worth mentioning. Is that any better than the strawman saying Bloom has done a great job building up the pen?
  2. How else was Bloom supposed to fill 12 urgent slots on the 40 and another 4-6 somewhat urgent slots on $40M? Not taking that into account, along with a farm that produce only Houck since mid 2017, while looking at only the W-L records is somehow viewed as being more "objective." I'm laughing- not "hyperventilating" or getting "very upset." The part that gets me the most is when we point out posters missing the full picture, we are branded as Bloom lovers and supportive of everything he has done. How is that worse than calling someone who said he'd never hire Cora as a "hater" or saying he was "against the Bloom hiring from day one," as a basher any worse? I think I'm closer to the truth than Old Red has been, but I expect he and others to take issue with that. Cue: bringing up all the things I got wrong as somehow proving they were right. Okay, notin and a select few others liked or were okay with the JBJ trade, but that doesn't mean they loved, liked or were even okay with every move Bloom made. I got bashed for "scratching my head" over a few moves but am often lumped in with the "Bloom lovers," whoever they are.
  3. You are on one hell of a roll! Making a strong push for Poster of the Year, IMO- a fully objective opinion, I might add! Lol
  4. It’s over the top saying there is a legion of Bloom lovers. Those defending Bloom from the onslaught of uncontextualized bashing is not loving anymore than saying someone who disliked his signing from day one is a hater. We all are somewhat guilty of exaggerating the other sides positions to varying degrees. You say it’s being objective to look at just the results, but that implies those who view the context of dumpster diving and non signings is being subjective or overly defensive of our current GM. Context is objective, too. Some might argue it is being more objective.
  5. I’m really excited about so many ML or near ML ready prospects but also some highly promising prospects not due for 2, 3 or more years from now. We seem to finally be set up for a constant flow of young talent- a far cry from the 5 year window from Devers to Bello/Casas.
  6. Like you know what objective means. Nobody here likes last places finishes or dumpster diving, but the budget forced the diving. That’s as objective as can be.
  7. Great strawman you built here. You are very good at it.
  8. Well said. It’s largely about context, but results do carry some weight, even if it comes after the GM leaves.
  9. Swanson might be less, but we may just decide to spend elsewhere and wait for Mayer. Maybe find a 1-2 year bridge SS.
  10. Indeed. I should have mentioned him but was thinking only of ML ready prospects.
  11. He did have similar circumstances in terms of no large and long contracts given, but he was handed a solid 40 man roster and farm. He improved the team in his 2-3 years, there. It's interesting to try and figure out which GM improved their whole team (40 man and farm + budget) by more: Bloom or Click. The starting points were vastly different.
  12. It's really Correa & Taillon plus 2 comp picks vs Bogey & Nate.
  13. Good points, as always.
  14. You keep saying 5 out of 7. For one thing, it's misleading and wrong to cut our 2015-2019, and for another, our outlook to start each year was not "last place" for any of those 5 years, except 2020. Fans had enough to look forward to those other 4 years to have hopes of making the playoffs. Sure, the discouragement of those seasons led to lost future ticket sales and NESN subscriptions, and that is likely why we ended up going over the tax line, this year, but personally, I see a lot to be optimistic about looking at 2023. I'm pumped up to watch Bello, Casas, Kelly and to some extent German, Crawford, Mata, EValdez and maybe Walter, Murphy, Crawford, Wink and our catching tandem of Wong & McGuire. I'm certain some will be disappointing, but I'm excited to see some I know will end up being plusses. I'm also near certain Bloom is going to spend more, this winter than ever before, and likely more than 2020 and 2021 combined. That's reason for excitement and optimism. It seems weird that some who chastised us for being all doom & gloom back in 2019, while b eing all rosy and cheerful about our future are now the ones seemingly all doom and gloomish.
  15. Rafaela and Abreu are about it for the OF, unless Duran makes a comeback (lol). With Kike's time up after 2023, that is certainly an area we could add a longterm solution to.
  16. Indeed, and to think DD would have done better within the same constraints is pure speculation and wishful thinking. Maybe he'd do better than Richards, Perez, Ottavino, Marwin, Andriese and Paxton, but there would have been no large and long deals and maybe no Whitlock, Schreiber, Refsnyder, Kike '21, Kelly, German, Wacha, Strahm, Hill, McGuire and this heep of new prospects added via trades. This is Bloom's legacy moment. The whole 3 years was designed to make 2023 the beginning or the next "window." On paper, things look optimistic, but we need to start seeing results.
  17. He's not poor or pitiful, and yes, he knew what he was hired to do, and at least on paper, he has fulfilled his number one priority: build up the farm and 40 man roster foundation to the point where we needed fewer slots to fill while setting up the budget to now have the funds to do it. I'm sure he's not happy about 2 last place finishes and felt the 2022 team was strong enough to make the playoffs and not finish last, but the team failed, this year. Blame injuries. Blame non moves. Blame the budget. Blame Bloom, but when I look at the totality of moves he made since the end of 2021, it looks like a net plus, but the wins did not indicate those improvements.
  18. He was handed a vastly different circumstances. Does that not matter, at all?
  19. Do you really think, if DD was handed the budget and demands of trading Betts & price, we'd have a better team and results, right now? I'll answer, I'm not sure, but I do think Bloom is more of the type of GM needed to rebuild and find gems in the rough than DD, but that's just my opinion. I have no way of knowing.
  20. Well, there was the Betts contract we had to tarde away. There was the Price contract we ended up paying half of. There was the Porcello contract we were not allowed to replace. There was a near empty ML ready farm that produced just Houck dince mid 2017. We brought all this up, so it's not like mentioning Sale means that is all we are focused on. The whole picture was bleak after 2019. Personally, I don't even think that is up for debate, but I don't want to sound authoritative.
  21. Um, the 2020 team did not "just go the World Series." The 2019 team was 84-78 and finished the season going 25-31. Then, the new GM was forced to trade the cornerstone of the team and Price while also losing Porcello. For someone who values the pen, this was the 2019 pen listed by most IP from the pen: Walden Workman Barnes Brasier Brewer Taylor Hembree Velazquez Weber DHern Josh Smith Cashner Shawaryn You can talk 3 years all you want, and it's a valid point, but context matters, and the team Bloom was handed was not close to the 2018 team. (Kimbrel & Kelly and others were gone before 2019, too.)
  22. To me, it's all about the winter spending budget vs how much came off the books each winter. It's not so much about the $230M budget, which by the way, included player pension money and dead money. Bloom has increased his percent of the total budget with his signings, but has anyone noticed how much of Bloom's money goes beyond 2022 or 2023? 2023: Story, Barnes, Whitlock & Kike 2024: Story & Whitlock When is the last time we saw that? To just point at the $230 number and imply Bloom is spending as much as past GMs is misleading.
  23. And, although many of the highly ranked prospects he traded away did not amount to much, he had the ability to trade many of them, keeping Devers, and acquire guys like Sale, Kimbrell, PomPom, Nate, Pearce and Nunez, among others. I counted 20 prospects that were at one time or another a top 20 prospect on soxprospects,com he traded away. Granted, some were no longer top 20, but he also traded away Shaw and a few others. (I'm not complaining, but just pointing out the stack he was handed that enabled him to acquire a guy like Sale and to a lesser extend Kimbrell. Bloom did not have that choice, even if they let him trade top prospects away.
  24. Yes, of course. It's not just the DD carry-over that is significant. Every GM is handed a set of cards to deal with, which includes the 40 man roster foundation, the budget and the farm. Our whole point about Bloom is that he was handed a set of cards that was among the worst, budget wise and farm wise, and when you factor in the mandate to trade Betts, price and probably Beni, the foundation was crumbling. Theo was handed a strong foundation but not great farm. He was allowed to spend, but not much at first. (He already had Manny & Pedro.) Ben was handed a decent foundation and okay farm, but it seemed like he was handed a top priority of rebuilding the farm. He ended up trading away most of the foundation and built up a near top farm for the next guy... DD was handed enough top farm hands to trade away and build an amazing 40 man roster foundation. He was also allowed to spend hugely (Price and Sale extension.) The foundation he was handed was not great, but he did have a solid core of Betts, Bogey, Beni and was smart enough to not trade away Devers. Bloom was handed the worst farm of the 4. None of the 4 were forced to cut the budget so radically in year one, and barely stay even for the next 2 seasons. That's two of the 3 major tenants of being a GM that were severely lacking. The foundation quality is debatable, because it included Betts, Beni, and at the time a somewhat decent Price and freakin Chris Sale not Chris freakin Sale, but when you take Betts, Price and Beni away and look at the expected decline of aging guys like JD, who actually did okay for his age, one can argue the foundation was not as good as the hopes of the remnants of 2018 promised .
×
×
  • Create New...