If it's JH's call and "fault," maybe Bloom is precisely they type of GM that fits into these schemes. He does what he's told to do.
There have been some good and great points made about the short-comings of this management team that starts from the top dog (JH) and the next level "dogs."
Some serious mistakes have been made. I don't think anyone disagrees with that, and on this board that is really something.
It seems like a major change in strategy has been underway, and as MVP pointed out, the way our top dogs treat people on the way out or before they chose to leave has been pretty bad, since at least the Tito departure. It's hard to see that changing as long as JH is in charge, but what matters most to me is whether or not the new strategy is a winning one. If they are trying to become like the Astros, and there are some signs they are, then maybe it all works out in the end. We did not have the tank years like the Astros did to really build up the farm, but it looks like building up and keeping the farm strong has become a major priority. That helps for long term consistency and winning, but we have not gotten to that point, yet.
Letting some key players go does not mean the end of winning, if you do it correctly. The Astros just got comp picks for Springer, Cole, Correa and now Verander, but they had ML ready prospects and young players good enough to step in without missing much of a beat. It remains to be seen, if we reach their level, but it seems to me, it has to start with a strong and deep farm. Next comes building up a foundation of young, controllable players that gets you to the point where just 2-3 key FA additions are needed, each year- maybe just 1, some years. The budget needs to be in sync, so re-sets can occur every 2-3 years. It's a tough balancing act, and it takes time to get to that position.
I'm trying to stay optimistic, but we have just $40M left and no ace and a big hole in the middle of our line-up..